Tag Archives: 2011

2011 GMC Terrain AWD SLT-2

2011 GMC Terrain AWD SLT-2

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the 2011 GMC Terrain AWD SLT-2.  GM replaced the Envoy (2002-2009) with the Terrain. And before it was called an Envoy it was called a Jimmy. Owners I talk with consider the GMC line as tough well made no nonsense trucks and SUVs. I’ve always been a Chevy man and although I’ve owned many brands over the years GM cars have been my favorites. After many Cadillac’s in my driveway I fell in love with the newer models and particularly the CTS V lights my fire. It is not only beautifully stylish with sharp character lines, it is fast and wildly fun to drive.

It is time again for Americans to return to cars made in this country. Economic times have shipped steel production and too much oil supply to off shore countries. That was fine when our economy was strong, but that is behind us so going forward consumers should get back on the team and buy “Made in USA” products.

There was a time when Japan knew how important the name USA was and to improve their product sales they named a city in Japan Usa so they could say their products were made there. Now made in Japan carries weight of its own and they don’t need to apologize any longer. China is now accepted by Wal-Mart shoppers but I find more discerning consumers demanding US made quality products when money is not as much a part of the decision making process.

Opinion:

It would appear GM is back. They’ve trimmed down a bit and hopefully they have dumped the losers in product lines to be profitable again. It just goes to show you that big or more is not necessarily better. The temptation to grow larger is natural to men generally. Perhaps it is the need to diversify and be secure in our endeavors. I suspect it is just too much to ask of mortal man to know when enough is enough. Or is it ok to have high and lofty goals like putting a man on the moon.

That reminds me of what a women said she was curious to know why it is that “if they can put a man on the moon, why can’t they put them all there”.

As we have watched the auto industry grow it began with a good idea and one car turned into hundreds today. And just like GM, Chrysler and Ford new car companies have followed the same pattern of a growing number of models. If it didn’t make good business by boosting sales car makers wouldn’t do it. More is good when there is growth in the economy, but that leads to top heavy cost. That growth based expense when faced with a rapidly declining market car companies were all in danger of going under.

Ultimately it is the consumer who decides if GM or any company is worthy. It is interesting to note here that Ford has never done better following the failure of Detroit generally. In my search for answers I found people were praising Ford for not taking bail out money. That was the defining moment that people would remember when it came time to buy a car. They offered a hand to lift Ford up first. And I think the mood of the country is to return to buying American products which will lead to more sales of GM and Chrysler as well.

The real message here, for me, is that down deep inside we all recognize the need to stand for right for the sake of right and we appreciate those who lead us back to moral and ethical values that make society work. That is what will bring us back to full employment. The goal is 4%. Think 4%.

Handling & Performance:

As you likely know, all SUV’s are built on truck platforms. But they don’t handle like trucks and the features and suspension make the ride more and more car like. SUVs are also leaning to even lower profiles to improve handling even more. Therefore they are tagged ‘Crossovers’ more often even though SUV is still the most common designator.

The desire for an off road vehicle is nearly a faint memory now, because only 5% of these highly capable truck adaptations ever get “Off Road” anyway. The closer to the ground stance makes them handle better but of course you give up road clearance that makes it truly equipped for ‘real’ off road-ing use. Consumers know they have other choices if they are a part of the 5% who have a passion for driving roads less travelled.

Styling:

Design is distinctively GMC truck with a more square look. My recent review of the Audi counterpart to this Terrain has more rounded and softer lines. That reminds me of the round look of the late 50s and 60s and how that trend passed away. Square is not as aerodynamic but at freeway speeds approaching 30 mph on an average day, wind resistance is rarely a factor in fuel economy.

Fit and Finish:

Very good.

Cost:

GMC is aggressively priced. I did like the Audi, but I don’t see a $10,000 price spread in quality of the two brands.

Conveniences and comfort:

Outstanding. Very little difference from the more expensive competition.

Consumer Recommendation:

Be sure to include this GMC in your comparison shopping test drives. It will make you think twice before sending your hard earned money to Germany or Japan. Even the Korean entrant makes this GMC look all the better.

Another thing that will work in favor of GMC is that fuel economy is good compared to other AWD competitors.

Recognized Competition (MSRP):

GMC Terrain $24,250, Acura RDX $32,620, Audi Q5 $35,200, BMW X3 $38,850, Cadillac SRX $34,430, Chevrolet Equinox $22,745, Dodge Journey $22,245, Dodge Nitro $22,245, Ford Escape $21,215, Honda Accord Crosstour $29,790, Honda CR-V $21,695, Honda Element $20,825, Hyundai Veracruz $28,345, Infiniti EX $34,550, Land Rover LR2 $35,500, Lexus RX 350 $38,375,  Lincoln MKX $39,375, Mazda CX-7 $21,990, Mercedes-Benz GLK $35,500, Mitsubishi Outlander $21,995, Nissan Murano $28,520, Nissan Rogue $20,830, Suzuki Grand Vitara $19,199, Toyota Highlander $27,540, Toyota RAV4 $22,025, Volvo XC 60 $32,400.

Good News:

Solid ride, well appointed and well equipped and priced right to aggressively go after foreign brand models.

Bad News:

This class vehicle is necessarily thirsty for fuel. The real bad news is that the price is heading north of $5 per gallon in the US.

Standard Equipment:

2.4 liter 182 horsepower 4-cylinder engine, 6-speed auto trans, 4-wheel abs disc brakes, stability control, traction control, tire pressure monitor, front side and side curtain airbags, LATCH system with safety locks, remote keyless entry, auto headlights, remote start, theft deterrent, OnStar with crash response and turn-by-turn navigation, rear parking assist, deep tinted glass, power liftgate, 18” aluminum wheels, fog lights, roof rack side rails, rearview camera, sunroof, leather heated bucket seats, leather wrapped steering wheel with audio controls, 8-way power driver seat with memory on seat and mirrors, 60/40 split reclining rear seat, climate control, tilt & telescopic column, cruise control, power windows & locks, stereo with CD & USB port and pioneer 8 speaker system, XM Satellite radio, compass and Bluetooth.

Gas Stats:

$3.81/ Gal avg. March 5, 2011

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

16 City and 22 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $31,400.

2011 Chevrolet Volt (880)

Overview: 

This week we’re looking at the 2011 Chevrolet Volt from the eyes of one of my publishers, Vincent Bodiford. Together we have owned newspapers in Colorado and Texas and now he publishes several papers in California.

Herewith is Vince’s take on the new Volt.

The 2011 Chevrolet Volt is a true long-range electric car. When Chevrolet was founded 100-years ago, cars were fueled by diesel, gasoline, steam and electric power. Gasoline eventually beat out all other fuels, but today the electric car is making a comeback.

Electricity reappeared at first in our modern hybrids – then pure-electric short-range cars. Chevrolet has bridged the endurance gap with the game-changing Volt, which runs entirely on battery-supplied electricity. When the battery runs down, a small gasoline engine starts and turns a generator, making all the electricity needed to run the motors and the systems. It’s a brilliant automotive execution of a the very same thing that makes railroad locomotives move – diesel engines turn generators to make electricity that turns the electric motors.

Solid as a freight-train and as luxurious as European sedan, the 2011 Chevrolet Volt has establishing an entirely new segment of long-range all-electric cars. The five-door, four-passenger Volt is not a hybrid – it’s a one-of-a-kind, all-electrically driven car with a range of up to 379 miles.

Handling & Performance:

The Chevrolet Volt is powered by the Voltec propulsion system, which is a 16-kWh lithium-ion battery pack and electric drive unit that provide pure electric range between 25 and 50 miles, depending on terrain, driving techniques and temperature. The 1.4L gasoline-powered engine extends the range up to an additional 344 miles on a full tank of fuel. Driving the Volt on our Freeways, we averaged about 40 miles battery range, and well over 100-mpg blended fuel economy (it sipped just 7-gallons of fuel in a week).

Driving the Volt proves electric driving can be spirited. Even though it’s a bit heavy, it easily reaches a top speed of 100-mph. At low speeds, the electric drive unit’s excellent low speed torque of 273 lb.-ft. takes it from zero-to-60 in less than 9-seconds and the quarter mile in less than 17-seconds.

Charging the Volt’s battery is simple, and can be done through 120V conventional household electrical outlet, or through a dedicated 240V charging station. The car is rechargeable in about four hours using a 240V outlet. It’s compatible with Charge-Point, and it can be charged for free at over 75 Chevrolet dealers in California.

Styling:

Futuristic in styling and technology, the Volt is bold and sleek, the performance-oriented stance conveys its electrically driven capabilities, and it looks like an upscale, midsize sport sedan. When you look at this car, it’s very technical and refined in its execution, with lots of interrelating surfaces that bring clean, crisp edges and creases.

Inside, the Volt offers the space, comfort, convenience and safety features that you expect in a premium five-door sedan – including storage compartments and 40/40 rear-folding seats. The Volt seems to express a new era of Chevrolet, with a cabin that is striking and innovative, including a front and rear dual cockpit design.

Fit and Finish:

Cost: 

Pricing starts at $32,780. which takes into account a $7,500. tax credit. Our fully-equipped test car was priced at $43,390., which included $2,390. in options, including premium trim package.

Conveniences and comfort:

There is much more technology inside the Volt than its electric propulsion system. It contains virtually every modern high-tech innovation – including high-res displays, and the ability to monitor and control vehicle functions remotely. It’s packed with GPS Navigation, Bose XM-premium sound, OnStar, Bluetooth and iPod connectivity, and OnStar’s Mylink mobile app, that lets you engage with the Volt functions using a smart phone.

Consumer Recommendation:

Volt’s warranty is comprehensive but not easy to understand – including 3-year/36-K miles bumper-to-bumper, 5-year/100-K miles gasoline powertrain and roadside assistance, 8-years/100-K miles battery warranty, and 6-year corrosion protection.

Recognized Competition:

Chevrolet Volt $40,000, Chevrolet Malibu Hyrbid n/a, Ford Fusion Hybrid $29,000, Honda Civic Hybrid $24,000, Honda Insight $18,000, Infiniti M Hybrid $54,000, Lexus CT 200h $29,000, Nissan Altima Hybrid $27,000, Nissan LEAF $33,000, Toyota Camry Hybrid $27,000.

Good News:

Even though it is technically a hybrid with a gas engine it really is all electric propulsion and fuel economy is about 90 mpg., as opposed to a hybrid that gets more like 40 mpg. However the difference in cost of the Volt will require over 10 years to break even as compared to a Hyrbid that gets about 40 mpg.

Bad News:

There are limited recharging sites but like anything, users will find out where all are. The cost is high, but there is a tax credit available that reduces the differential or added cost of the Hybrid competition.

Standard Equipment:

1.4 liter 149 horsepower 4-cylinder engine, continuously variable transmission, air conditioning, power windows & locks, seating for 4, CD Player, NAV system, front and side airbags, SBS brake system, traction control, stability control.

Gas Stats:

$3.55/ Gal avg. August 18, 2011

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

95 City and 90 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $26,500.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2011 – An Automotive Love Affair

2011 Kia Sportage EX AWD

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the 2011 Kia Sportage EX AWD crossover / SUV. Here is yet another Korean made SUV that has been earning its place in the US market. I recommended a Kia Sorento for my daughter Jen and it has served her well in toting the kids to and fro with school and sports. Price is what moved her to a Korean car and I haven’t been sorry I pushed her in that direction. Simply put she got more for her money. Secondly and equally important the economy has dictated much of what we do to save money.

Guess what… every time you buy a foreign made car or a US car that is made in a foreign country you are “OUTSOURCING”. Dirty word. Not at all. You do it because you must. You support other economies because they don’t have unions. We do in America and they have outlived their usefulness in ‘today’s world’.

As to this Kia – The price is right and the product has stood the test of time now for long enough now to give us confidence that it is here to stay.

Handling & Performance:

These newer SUVs are lower to the ground and although they are not as well suited to off road use they are better on the highways. But this Sportage sports AWD – All Wheel Drive – which gives it sure footing in all road conditions. A short turning radius and smaller size makes it agile and well suited to zipping around town and easier when it comes to parking. The 176 horse engine is perfect for this size car with average to good fuel consumption.

Styling:

The Sportage is new for 2011 with a modern, clean design that features a high beltline, sweeping angles and more pronounced wheel flares than its predecessor. The second-generation Sportage debuted as a 2005 model with a sportier and more elegant design than its more rugged predecessor and more interior room due to a longer wheelbase and wider stance. The Sportage was first introduced in 1995 and in 1997 Sportage adopted the automobile industry’s first knee airbag to augment its high level of standard equipment. For the 1999 model year, Kia added a 2-door Sportage convertible with a removable soft-top over the rear seat area with a fixed hardtop over the front seat area.

Fit and Finish:
Very good.

Cost:
As expected Korea has come to play and are slightly more price competitive. But it is slight and the competition is fierce with only two US products – Chevrolet and Jeep.

Consumer Recommendation:
Unless you intend to do a lot of off roading this Kia fits in well with the competition. Jeep remains the only option here in class for off road use. I had done a lot of off road stuff with Jeep and remain impressed with the performance in that venue. The liberty therefore would have an edge over the rest of the field for me.

Conveniences and comfort:
I like most of us, love gadgets and gizmos. But they are not only fun they are functional and help us to enjoy the driving experience. One such new feature on the scene these days is ‘voice activated’ control. You know how many Nav systems require you are stopped to input a destination? Well enter ‘voice activation’ and wa-la you just tell it where you want to go and it will make that happen at full speed. This is really cool. Then if you want to change the radio station you can do the same thing. You push a button on the steering wheel and the system asks for a command and you tell it what you want to do.

Recognized Competition:
Kia Sportage $18-25,000, Chevrolet Equinox $23-30,000, Ford Escape $21-27,000, Honda CR-V $22-30,000, Hyundai Tucson $19-26,000, Jeep Liberty $23-28,000, Mazda Tribute $20-29,000, Mitsubishi Outlander $21-29,000, Nissan JUKE $19-25,000, Nissan Rogue $21-26,000, Subaru Forester $20-28,000, Suzuki Grand Vitara $19-27,000, Toyota RAV4 $22-28,000.

Good News:
Competitive, great around town car, good fuel economy.

Bad News:
None.

Standard Equipment:
2.4 liter inline 4 cylinder 176 hp engine, 6-speed auto trans, power steering, power 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, all wheel drive, front and side curtain airbags, traction control, stability control, up & downhill brake assist, rollover protection system, tire pressure monitoring, LATCH system (child safety), dual zone climate control, power windows and locks, power mirrors, keyless entry, audio with CD/MP3/ 6 speakers, SIRIUS satellite radio, USB & aux audio inputs, power front seats with lumbar, 60/40 split folding rear seats, cooling glove box, cruise control with trip computer, tilt leather wrapped steering wheel with audio, cruise & Bluetooth controls, roof rails, fog lights, auto headlights and privacy and solar glass.

Gas Stats:
$3.03/ Gal avg. November 2, 2010
www.fueleconomy.gov
for more information.

21 City and 28 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $24,795.

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Sedan (2011)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the 2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Sedan. As you likely know, the makers of the original Saab also built aircraft. The instrument panel on this Saab is reminiscent of the instrumentation you find in an aircraft cockpit as to look and feel. Sweet.

The 2.8-liter V6 is the same engine found in the Cadillac SRX, and comes with the new XWD all-wheel drive that is termed “Cross Wheel Drive” and is capable of sending 100% of the torque to the rear wheels or front wheels, which is a departure from prior AWD applications. The front-wheel-drive only versions are powered by a turbocharged four-cylinder engine and will be available in the fall. The car was developed by General Motors and uses the basics of the chassis found in the Buick Regal and LaCrosse.

Opinion:

HUGE California Traffic Ticket Fines Effective 01/06/2011
California is broke and they want to collect money from you, that is nothing more than taxation. If safety were the reason for the fine increases they would have been set long ago in the interest of safety. This is clearly a move to take money from the people to save government jobs. SO, be careful and don’t give those ^%#*&@&’s the chance to rip you off. While private sector jobs are being lost government jobs are not.

I remind you –

These folks are not your friend. When you get on the highway be wary of this ‘taxation without representation’ move by the Gestapo-like police. Our public servants are beginning to look more like the enemy and we pay them twice what the average worker gets in the private sector.

Herewith, some of the fines to be coldly imposed on you:

VC 22507(B)     $1876       Violation of disabled parking provisions, second offense.
VC 22507(A)       $976       Violation of disabled parking provisions, first offense.
VC 22500            $976       Parking in a bus loading area.
VC 16028(A)     $796         Failure to provide evidence of financial responsibility (insurance)
VC 22454(A)      $616        Passing a school bus with flashing red signals.
VC 21453(A)     $436         Failure to stop at a red signal.
VC 27360            $436        Mandatory use of passenger child restraints.
VC 22350           $328         Unsafe speed, 16 to 25 miles over the limit.
VC 23123(B)      $256        Driving while using a wireless phone not hands free, each subsequent offense. VC 12814.6    $214           Failure to obey license provisions.

If you do get fined, the following information is from a company who claims you can “Beat your California traffic ticket” or your money back. www.ticketbust.com or call 800-850-8038. If you have used them please share your experience – my email joe@atthewheel.com.

More information at http://www.thumpertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=947063

Handling & Performance:

The all wheel drive system has a new twist and thus they term it the XWD system, which is a fully-automatic, on-demand system that is capable of sending up to 100 percent of the engine torque to the front or the rear wheels whenever it is required. Of course it is totally transparent to the driver and no intervention is needed to take advantage of this feature.

Styling:

“Nice looking car”! I hear comments like that on occasion and did with this Saab. I agree. It has the best design lines ever for Saab.

Fit and Finish:
Excellent.

Cost:

The Saab costs much more than the average price of others in the midsize class but is far less than most other luxury cars I see as comparable.

Conveniences and comfort:

The Electronic Parking Brake is the way Saab has chosen to apply the parking brake and it is found on other expensive cars. I can live without that kind of feature. It reminds me of a radio with a button instead of a dial. They both do the same thing but one is simple the other is a malfunction waiting to happen. I fail to see the purpose since I feel if it isn’t broken why fix it?

Leave your key fob in your pocket or purse except to open the doors or trunk. I prefer being able to leave the key in my pocket all the time.

Another handy feature is the parking assist and also a new adaptation that sounds a bell when you drift close to your lane divider lines. Of course you can see where all these features are leading us. It is like we’re given small pieces of the puzzle and one day the cruise sensors will allow the car to drive you down the road all by itself and instead of sounding a bell the computer will simply correct the drift to the side or get too close to the car in front of you. All of this at 70 mph. Great stuff.

However, some will tell you that by the time that happens, someone else will develop a ‘Transporter’ and Scotty will beam you up, and we will no longer need cars, oil drilling or crashes and car insurance.

Consumer Recommendation:

If this group is in your price range Saab is worth including in your search and I think you’ll agree it is really worth your consideration.

Recognized Competition:

Saab 9-5 Aero $39-50,000, Acura TL $35-44,000, Audi A6 $45-59,000, BMW 5-Series $45-62,000, Cadillac CTS $35-62,000, Chrysler 300 $27-45,000, Dodge Charger $25-38,000, Hyundai Genesis $33-43,000, Infiniti M $47-60,000, Jaguar XF Series $53-80,000, Lexus GS $46-55,000, Mercedes Benz E-Class $49-88,000, Volkswagen Passat $27,915, Volvo S60 $37,700, Volvo S80 $37-41,000.

Good News:

Wonderful handling and comfortable ride, fast turbo performance.

Bad News:

Fuel economy is 4 mpg less than the average in midsize class and I was not real happy with the visibility.

Standard Equipment:

2.8 liter V6 300 horsepower turbocharged engine, 6-speed automatic transmission, XWD all wheel drive system, electronic rear limited slip differential, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, electronic parking brake, 18” alloy wheels, electronic stability control, tire pressure monitor, keyless entry with start/stop button, tilt column and leather wrapped steering wheel with shift and audio controls, cooled glove box, 8-way power driver seat, power windows and locks, power heated mirrors, auto-dim rearview mirror, split folding rear seat with pass through to trunk, stereo with CD player and 9 speakers, USB port, satellite radio, headlight washers, Bluetooth for phone, heated front seats, cruise control, fog lights, rain sensing wipers, dual zone climate control, front side and side curtain airbags, rear side airbags, child security door locks and theft deterrent system.

Gas Stats:

$3.29/ Gal avg. Jan 8, 2010
www.fueleconomy.gov
for more information.

16 City and 27 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $47,565.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2011 – An Automotive Love Affair

2011 Fiat 500 Merkel

Overview:

This week we’re visiting with car aficionado Merkel Weiss and his observations of the New 2011 Fiat 500 and a sprinkling of inside information you only hear from auto industry insiders. Frequent readers of this column will recall Professor Weiss taught several of the best auto designers while at Art Center College of Design over the Rose Bowl in Pasadena.

You may know that Fiat is huge in the rest of the world. I bought a shiny new 124 Spider back in 1969 and we loved it. Fiat has always provided efficient transportation across all of Europe. Under Communism and beyond into Capitalism in Poland after 1992 Fiat seemed to me to be over 50% of every car I saw on the roads from north in Gdansk on the Baltic Sea to Krakow and Bytom in the South of the country. Why, because even back then 50 mpg was common and that little car seated 4 adults. Today Poland is a thriving democracy and I suspect they are driving larger cars as well. Herewith some of the New information and expectations for Fiats re-entrance into the US market from Merkel Weiss.

Opinion:

THE FIAT 500 ENTERS THE WORLD STAGE

I attended the Fiat Gala held at a Chrysler dealership on S. Figueroa near the Los Angeles Convention Center. It was packed with the typical Los Angeles socialite crowd that usually makes me want to run away and hide. But this time was different. I visited with a few in the know friends surrounded by new, Mexican built, pre-production Fiat 500s everywhere. There were people there that actually knew about the car.

Friend Rex was able to speak with factory reps who said that, contrary to what we had
been led to understand in the automotive press, there were a few things done to the
European car to “Americanize” it, but the US version is fundamentally unchanged. We got some
new cupholders along with reinforced bumpers that add a little more to the overall length. But the good news is that although it may well sit on softer springs, this car is still very much the car we were all hoping it would be. It’s lovely.

The Fiat 500 is a completely modern little car that is about as charming and Italian as anyone could have hoped for. It was designed by Frank Stephanson (stef-an-sun), the very same guy who designed the Mini Cooper when he was at BMW. He also did some good work at Ferrari as well.

The new Fiat 500 is a nicely constructed car. The paint and panel gaps are all very
respectable and the interior is charming. Seating is good in front but rear seating is another story. Short rides would be ok back there but forget long trips. Rear head room is severely compromised.

There is no word yet on the US introduction of the diesel engine. The turbocharged engine will allegedly make its appearance in the Abarth model. There will also be a roll back roof convertible, and a 4-door wagon type, reminiscent of the old 500 Giardinera.

As I was leaving the event I ran into the head of Fiat, Sergio Marchionne. He was speaking softly to a small crowd of journalists who were taking notes on small tablets. I walked up and stood there silently when someone said: “Mr. Marchionne, what do you think of the new GM IPO?” Everyone looked confused for a second and I instinctively blurted out the price was initially $24 but is now pushing well over $30. Marchionne turned to me and I instinctively reached over to shake his hand and introduced myself. I spent a few minutes of uninterrupted conversation with this very savvy guy.

Marchionne is frank and open with his observations and has been quoted in the Italian press that he says Italian factories are underperforming, especially the Sicilian one, producing only a small fraction of the efficient production of their Polish facility. He said the Italian auto workers union needs to make some serious adjustments to their contract. He has further stated that Fiat would do way better financially without Italian plants. I’m confident he was using the Italian plant closure threat as ammunition to get his stalled labor agenda moving again. Italian politicians, clearly labor supporters, jumped down his throat claiming that he spoke as a Canadian (which he is) as opposed to an Italian.

Meanwhile, back in Germany, Volkswagen led by Engr. Dr. Ferdinand Piech, grandson of the great Dr. Ferdinand Porsche, indicated VW would like to purchase Alfa Romeo, and he would be patient in that quest. Marchionne, however, announced recently that Alfa is not for sale and in fact they will produce a whole new line of Alfas to be sold as Chryslers and some Chryslers will be sold in Europe as Lancias.

Piech’s exploits are nothing short of amazing and his conquest of Porsche was simply epic. They already own Bugatti, Lamborghini, and others, totaling some 13 companies in all. He also said he will pass Toyota in sales and be the #1 car company in the world. And VW has begun to do exactly that.

In further developments, Ferrari will offer an IPO of its own shortly. One can only imagine the feeding frenzy on that one. I don’t want to say, so much for Alfa Romeo not going to Volkswagen, because Ferdinand Piech is about as clever as clever gets. In the past, whatever he has wanted, he has eventually gotten, from small companies like Skoda to large ones like Porsche.

So there we are. Given a background of the free world economy just hanging on
with no real recovery in sight, and the Italian labor situation on the edge of major disaster, up walks a quiet Canadian Marchionne with the Fiat 500 that is met with great reviews and promise of moving Fiat into even more profitable years ahead.

Standard Equipment:

1.4 liter 16v 94 horsepower 4-cylinder engine, 6 speed manual transmission, 15” steel wheels, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes with electronic brake distribution, air conditioning, power windows & locks with keyless entry, audio with CD/MP3, front and side and side curtain airbags, traction control & stability control, 50/50 split folding rear seat, tilt steering column, two 12 v dc power outlets, rear window washer wiper / defroster, cruise control & power heated mirrors.

Gas Stats:

$3.17/ Gal avg. Dec 14, 2010
www.fueleconomy.gov
for more information.

35 City and 45 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $15,500.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2010 – An Automotive Love Affair

2011 Fiat 500 (2011)

Overview:

This week we’re visiting with car aficionado Merkel Weiss and his observations of the New 2011 Fiat 500 and a sprinkling of inside information you only hear from auto industry insiders. Frequent readers of this column will recall Professor Weiss taught several of the best auto designers while at Art Center College of Design over the Rose Bowl in Pasadena.

You may know that Fiat is huge in the rest of the world. I bought a shiny new 124 Spider back in 1969 and we loved it. Fiat has always provided efficient transportation across all of Europe. Under Communism and beyond into Capitalism in Poland after 1992 Fiat seemed to me to be over 50% of every car I saw on the roads from north in Gdansk on the Baltic Sea to Krakow and Bytom in the South of the country. Why, because even back then 50 mpg was common and that little car seated 4 adults. Today Poland is a thriving democracy and I suspect they are driving larger cars as well. Herewith some of the New information and expectations for Fiats re-entrance into the US market from Merkel Weiss.

Opinion:

THE FIAT 500 ENTERS THE WORLD STAGE

I attended the Fiat Gala held at a Chrysler dealership on S. Figueroa near the Los Angeles Convention Center. It was packed with the typical Los Angeles socialite crowd that usually makes me want to run away and hide. But this time was different. I visited with a few in the know friends surrounded by new, Mexican built, pre-production Fiat 500s everywhere. There were people there that actually knew about the car.

Friend Rex was able to speak with factory reps who said that, contrary to what we had
been led to understand in the automotive press, there were a few things done to the
European car to “Americanize” it, but the US version is fundamentally unchanged. We got some
new cupholders along with reinforced bumpers that add a little more to the overall length. But the good news is that although it may well sit on softer springs, this car is still very much the car we were all hoping it would be. It’s lovely.

The Fiat 500 is a completely modern little car that is about as charming and Italian as anyone could have hoped for. It was designed by Frank Stephanson (stef-an-sun), the very same guy who designed the Mini Cooper when he was at BMW. He also did some good work at Ferrari as well.

The new Fiat 500 is a nicely constructed car. The paint and panel gaps are all very
respectable and the interior is charming. Seating is good in front but rear seating is another story. Short rides would be ok back there but forget long trips. Rear head room is severely compromised.

There is no word yet on the US introduction of the diesel engine. The turbocharged engine will allegedly make its appearance in the Abarth model. There will also be a roll back roof convertible, and a 4-door wagon type, reminiscent of the old 500 Giardinera.

As I was leaving the event I ran into the head of Fiat, Sergio Marchionne. He was speaking softly to a small crowd of journalists who were taking notes on small tablets. I walked up and stood there silently when someone said: “Mr. Marchionne, what do you think of the new GM IPO?” Everyone looked confused for a second and I instinctively blurted out the price was initially $24 but is now pushing well over $30. Marchionne turned to me and I instinctively reached over to shake his hand and introduced myself. I spent a few minutes of uninterrupted conversation with this very savvy guy.

Marchionne is frank and open with his observations and has been quoted in the Italian press that he says Italian factories are underperforming, especially the Sicilian one, producing only a small fraction of the efficient production of their Polish facility. He said the Italian auto workers union needs to make some serious adjustments to their contract. He has further stated that Fiat would do way better financially without Italian plants. I’m confident he was using the Italian plant closure threat as ammunition to get his stalled labor agenda moving again. Italian politicians, clearly labor supporters, jumped down his throat claiming that he spoke as a Canadian (which he is) as opposed to an Italian.

Meanwhile, back in Germany, Volkswagen led by Engr. Dr. Ferdinand Piech, grandson of the great Dr. Ferdinand Porsche, indicated VW would like to purchase Alfa Romeo, and he would be patient in that quest. Marchionne, however, announced recently that Alfa is not for sale and in fact they will produce a whole new line of Alfas to be sold as Chryslers and some Chryslers will be sold in Europe as Lancias.

Piech’s exploits are nothing short of amazing and his conquest of Porsche was simply epic. They already own Bugatti, Lamborghini, and others, totaling some 13 companies in all. He also said he will pass Toyota in sales and be the #1 car company in the world. And VW has begun to do exactly that.

In further developments, Ferrari will offer an IPO of its own shortly. One can only imagine the feeding frenzy on that one. I don’t want to say, so much for Alfa Romeo not going to Volkswagen, because Ferdinand Piech is about as clever as clever gets. In the past, whatever he has wanted, he has eventually gotten, from small companies like Skoda to large ones like Porsche.

So there we are. Given a background of the free world economy just hanging on
with no real recovery in sight, and the Italian labor situation on the edge of major disaster, up walks a quiet Canadian Marchionne with the Fiat 500 that is met with great reviews and promise of moving Fiat into even more profitable years ahead.

Standard Equipment:

1.4 liter 16v 94 horsepower 4-cylinder engine, 6 speed manual transmission, 15” steel wheels, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes with electronic brake distribution, air conditioning, power windows & locks with keyless entry, audio with CD/MP3, front and side and side curtain airbags, traction control & stability control, 50/50 split folding rear seat, tilt steering column, two 12 v dc power outlets, rear window washer wiper / defroster, cruise control & power heated mirrors.

Gas Stats:

$3.17/ Gal avg. Dec 14, 2010
www.fueleconomy.gov
for more information.

35 City and 45 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $15,500.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2010 – An Automotive Love Affair

2011 Mitsubishi Lancer ES 4-door sedan

Overview

This week we’re looking at the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer ES 4-door sedan.

Remember when Studebaker was on the scene and people complained that you couldn’t tell whether it was coming or going because the front looked just like the rear end. I remember it mostly because my grandmother, born in Sicily before the turn of the 20th Century, visited us in California and thought we had weird cars here. In those days cars were distinctive for sure, but more important there were fewer brands so you weren’t confused by several hundred models. They were either Ford, GM or Chrysler cars. Today the computer kicks out pretty generic ho-hum similar looking cars. In the case of this Lancer, the grill is nearly the same as the Audi A4 turned upside down. Who did the design first I don’t know, but they are frightfully the same.

Opinion:

More observations about posted speed limits. While driving up State Highway 99 through the central valley of California I was reminded posted speeds are 70 mph in most areas. I have made that trip a lot since I have family and business in Southern Oregon. What I have observed is that traffic moves along at about 75-80 mph. Not much different from average commuter speeds in Southern California where the posted speed limit on the freeway is 65 mph. 

There is a comfort zone in speed that drivers feel in control and the vast majority move along in packs at 75-80 irrespective of the posted limit. The bad guys can choose their prey at will because we’re all exceeding posted speed limits. Do you think there is a method to the madness of the law makers who set those limits?

In response to my belief that limits should be raised encouraged Bill says (summarized):

“I think current speed limits are just fine… (more importantly) Our highways are in great need of repair, and cause much wear on vehicles that drivers are not aware of, steel belts of tires broken from pot holes, wheels out of round, suspension damage, wheel alignment, shock and strut damage…

What about our growing population from south of the border and around the world, what kind of driving skills do they bring?   Yes modern vehicles have many safety features… I argue that if the speed limit was 75 mph, drivers would drive 85/90 mph and while I’m not a Al Gore fan, after 80/85 mph fuel consumption goes sky high… As my wife say’s “If you are in that big of a hurry, leave sooner”. At the end of your article it says, “buckle up and drive safely”. How can driving faster be safer?

My whole point was that the limits are artificially low and serve only to raise money. Moving the limits up to what people persist on driving respects the will of the people, in spite of the obscene fines.

Handling & Performance:

Lancer provides just adequate power at 148 hp mostly because of the manual shifting. The low center of gravity provides excellent cornering.

Styling:

In my opinion Mitsubishi cars are mostly designed for the younger driver which means they just don’t fit the over 40+ group. I wanted to see if was just me or is it a fact. The study noted below seems to support my feeling.

Fit and Finish:

Very good.

Cost:

Well priced compact sedan.

Conveniences and comfort:

Nothing special, but the important features like traction and stability control are included.

Consumer Recommendation:

A new study recently completed by TrueCar.com, showed that Mitsubishi, Mazda and Volkswagen have the highest concentration of younger buyers.  The study was completed in May 2010 and looked at the last full year of available data.

The brands with the highest percentage of buyers 18 to 34, is topped by Mitsubishi (18.3%), with its young skewing list of models that includes the Lancer and the Eclipse. Mazda (18%), with the popular Mazda3 and Mazda6, and Volkswagen (17.6%), which features the list topping GTI and Jetta, were next with Nissan (15.6%) and Mini (15%) rounding out the top 5.

Recognized Competition:

Mitsubishi Lancer $15-27,000, Audi S4 $47-49,000, Chevrolet Cobalt $15-25,000, Ford Focus $17-20,000, Honda Civic $16-25,000, Hyundai Elantra $15-20,000, Kia Forte $15-19,000, Mazda3 $16-23,000, Nissan Sentra $16-20,000, Subaru Impreza $17-20,000, Toyota Corolla $16-18,000, Volkswagen Golf $18-24,000, Volkswagen GTI $24-30,000.

Good News:

Well price, fun to drive, good safety features and very good fuel economy numbers.

Bad News:

A little under powered. You’d need to move to Ralliart for 237 hp with a price of about $27,000.

Standard Equipment:

2.0 liter 148 horsepower inline 4 cylinder engine, 5-speed manual transmission, front Macpherson strut, rear multilink suspension, 4-wheel ABS front disc and rear drum brakes with electronic brake force distribution, front stabilizer bar, front and side curtain airbags with drivers knee airbag, LATCH child seat system, tire pressure monitor, engine immobilizer with anti-theft system, stability and traction control, air conditioning, height adjustable column, power steering with wheel mounted cruise and audio controls, multi information display, audio with CD/MP3 w/ 4-speakers, 6-way adjustable driver seat, 60/40 split fold down rear seatback, power windows, locks and mirrors, 2 12 volt outlets, remote keyless entry and auto headlights.

Gas Stats:

$3.33/ Gal avg. Jan 29, 2011

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

24 City and 33 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $16,395.Overview

This week we’re looking at the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer ES 4-door sedan.

Remember when Studebaker was on the scene and people complained that you couldn’t tell whether it was coming or going because the front looked just like the rear end. I remember it mostly because my grandmother, born in Sicily before the turn of the 20th Century, visited us in California and thought we had weird cars here. In those days cars were distinctive for sure, but more important there were fewer brands so you weren’t confused by several hundred models. They were either Ford, GM or Chrysler cars. Today the computer kicks out pretty generic ho-hum similar looking cars. In the case of this Lancer, the grill is nearly the same as the Audi A4 turned upside down. Who did the design first I don’t know, but they are frightfully the same.

Opinion:

More observations about posted speed limits. While driving up State Highway 99 through the central valley of California I was reminded posted speeds are 70 mph in most areas. I have made that trip a lot since I have family and business in Southern Oregon. What I have observed is that traffic moves along at about 75-80 mph. Not much different from average commuter speeds in Southern California where the posted speed limit on the freeway is 65 mph. 

There is a comfort zone in speed that drivers feel in control and the vast majority move along in packs at 75-80 irrespective of the posted limit. The bad guys can choose their prey at will because we’re all exceeding posted speed limits. Do you think there is a method to the madness of the law makers who set those limits?

In response to my belief that limits should be raised encouraged Bill says (summarized):

“I think current speed limits are just fine… (more importantly) Our highways are in great need of repair, and cause much wear on vehicles that drivers are not aware of, steel belts of tires broken from pot holes, wheels out of round, suspension damage, wheel alignment, shock and strut damage…

What about our growing population from south of the border and around the world, what kind of driving skills do they bring?   Yes modern vehicles have many safety features… I argue that if the speed limit was 75 mph, drivers would drive 85/90 mph and while I’m not a Al Gore fan, after 80/85 mph fuel consumption goes sky high… As my wife say’s “If you are in that big of a hurry, leave sooner”. At the end of your article it says, “buckle up and drive safely”. How can driving faster be safer?

My whole point was that the limits are artificially low and serve only to raise money. Moving the limits up to what people persist on driving respects the will of the people, in spite of the obscene fines.

Handling & Performance:

Lancer provides just adequate power at 148 hp mostly because of the manual shifting. The low center of gravity provides excellent cornering.

Styling:

In my opinion Mitsubishi cars are mostly designed for the younger driver which means they just don’t fit the over 40+ group. I wanted to see if was just me or is it a fact. The study noted below seems to support my feeling.

Fit and Finish:

Very good.

Cost:

Well priced compact sedan.

Conveniences and comfort:

Nothing special, but the important features like traction and stability control are included.

Consumer Recommendation:

A new study recently completed by TrueCar.com, showed that Mitsubishi, Mazda and Volkswagen have the highest concentration of younger buyers.  The study was completed in May 2010 and looked at the last full year of available data.

The brands with the highest percentage of buyers 18 to 34, is topped by Mitsubishi (18.3%), with its young skewing list of models that includes the Lancer and the Eclipse. Mazda (18%), with the popular Mazda3 and Mazda6, and Volkswagen (17.6%), which features the list topping GTI and Jetta, were next with Nissan (15.6%) and Mini (15%) rounding out the top 5.

Recognized Competition:

Mitsubishi Lancer $15-27,000, Audi S4 $47-49,000, Chevrolet Cobalt $15-25,000, Ford Focus $17-20,000, Honda Civic $16-25,000, Hyundai Elantra $15-20,000, Kia Forte $15-19,000, Mazda3 $16-23,000, Nissan Sentra $16-20,000, Subaru Impreza $17-20,000, Toyota Corolla $16-18,000, Volkswagen Golf $18-24,000, Volkswagen GTI $24-30,000.

Good News:

Well price, fun to drive, good safety features and very good fuel economy numbers.

Bad News:

A little under powered. You’d need to move to Ralliart for 237 hp with a price of about $27,000.

Standard Equipment:

2.0 liter 148 horsepower inline 4 cylinder engine, 5-speed manual transmission, front Macpherson strut, rear multilink suspension, 4-wheel ABS front disc and rear drum brakes with electronic brake force distribution, front stabilizer bar, front and side curtain airbags with drivers knee airbag, LATCH child seat system, tire pressure monitor, engine immobilizer with anti-theft system, stability and traction control, air conditioning, height adjustable column, power steering with wheel mounted cruise and audio controls, multi information display, audio with CD/MP3 w/ 4-speakers, 6-way adjustable driver seat, 60/40 split fold down rear seatback, power windows, locks and mirrors, 2 12 volt outlets, remote keyless entry and auto headlights.

Gas Stats:

$3.33/ Gal avg. Jan 29, 2011

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

24 City and 33 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $16,395.

2012 Subaru Impreza 5-Door: Less is More (903)

Overview: 

This week we’re looking at the 2012 Subaru Impreza 5-Door: Less is More – Driven By Jim Powell- Auto Journalist. This guest column is from a colleague of many years and he writes a column for the Mojave Daily News in the Antelope Valley, CA. Herewith is Jim’s review of the Impreza from Subaru.

Everyone seems to know the brand names of WRX or STI but few seem to know what a Subaru Impreza even looks like. Even my family in the Pacific Northwest, where every other car and SUV is a Subaru, did not recognize that Subaru made a compact car and 5-door wagon/hatchback in addition to a Forester and Outback. This might be because the previous Impreza without the performance WRX equipment was more expensive and less fuel efficient than a Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic, or Nissan Sentra. In Europe, the Impreza has been sold as an upscale compact and priced out of the mainstream compact market.

Handling & Performance:

Let us get this straight. The size of the 2012 engine got smaller. Horsepower and torque has been reduced in the non-turbo Impreza engine. And the car got larger? Well, good for Subaru for building a lighter engine, vehicle, and stronger platform using high-strength steel for the same amount of money. $17,495 is the starting MSRP for the 2012 Impreza sedan which matches the outgoing model. Yet the 2012 Impreza gets improvements in mileage with an EPA estimated 27 mpg city and 36 mpg highway.  According to Subaru, these changes make the 2012 Impreza the most fuel efficient all-wheel drive car in America.

Having driven the 5-door Impreza recently, I was impressed with the quiet and smooth operation of the new engine and the total package (CVT sedan starts at $18,495). Acceleration from the 2.0 liter flat Boxer four-cylinder engine with148 horsepower was fairly strong and the mid-range power curve makes the car more drivable on 2-lane highways where many Subaru’s tend to live. Passing trucks in this lighter car feels more comfortable and high winds don’t seem to bother the Impreza’s handling either.

The new 2.0-liter Boxer engine is actually the same size displacement as an earlier Subaru engine but is really a whole new animal. They have lengthened the piston stroke for more mid-range grunt. The new double overhead camshafts have been modified for better engine intake and exhaust breathing at idle and under a load. There is now a Dual Active Valve Control System (DAVCS) for more efficient torque distribution. So the goal is not a dragster engine or a quick torque peak WRX engine but rather a stronger mid-range power curve for everyday driving.

The 5-speed manual transmission in the 2012 Impreza is noticeably smoother and the shifting gates are more aligned and less clunky. The stick shift transmission has been Subaru’s Achilles heel in recent years but this gearbox has been improved for 2012. However, for the higher mileage, consumers should choose the second-generation Constant-Variable Transmission (CVT) that provides infinite gear of ratios.

Having lived with this belt-driven transfer of power in Nissans for years, Subaru has made their CVT quicker to response when starting up from a stop and quicker to adjust when passing power is demanded. Either transmission will do the job but the CVT is less to think about and features a 6-speed manual mode with steering wheel paddle shifters, which allows the driver to control the transmission via six pre-set ratios. A remember, it gets 2-5 mpg better mileage.

There are two different versions of standard Symmetrical AWD and average street driving will not reveal which one is which. The Impreza models with the 5-speed manual transmission feature a “Continuous AWD” with a viscous coupling locking center differential that simply and efficiently splits the power between the front to rear (50:50). The Lineartronic® CVT models use what Subaru calls “Active AWD.” This system electronically manages a continuously variable transfer clutch that splits wheel torque based on a variety of speed and engine demands. During acceleration, deceleration, and wheel slip, the computer determines the power ratio front to rear and back again for the best traction on wet and dry surfaces.

The longer wheelbase(104.1 inches) has given both Impreza models a larger backseat and the 5-door a very usable cargo compartment (Rear seats up/down: 22.5 cu. ft./52.4 cu. ft.). Little things like a hatch that opens high enough to not decapitate tall people, doors the seal well enough to keep out wind noise, and controls that are easy to understand, are what makes a Subaru a Subaru.  Now the windshield is more raked than in the previous Impreza, with the bottom of the A-pillar moved 7.9 inches forward, allowing for a front door opening nearly five inches longer for easier entry/exit.

Styling:

Higher hip points and a lower, flatter instrument panel, along with larger side mirrors, contribute to better visibility all around the driver. The backseat is larger and the headroom is slightly increased but the rear doors could be lengthened to make ingress and egress easier. Like so many other car companies, there is an assumption that more than 2 people will not be coming along for the ride. The rear compartment in the hatchback is symmetrical with good storage on the sides but it is not very well finished.

Cost:

The 2012 Impreza is offered in 2.0i Premium, Sport Premium and Limited models – the Limited a new addition for this year. The 5-door Premium hatchback starts at $19,295 and includes many standard amenities like air conditioning, cruise control, trip computer, and keyless central locks. For the 2.0i Limited, prices start at $21,595 for the 4-door and $22,095 for the 5-door version. Finally, the Impreza 2.0i Sport Premium starts at $20,295 and is only offered in the 5-door body style.

There are also some Legacy/Outback features like the All-Weather Package, body-color rocker panels, fog lights, roof rails, and upgraded fabric upholstery. The Sport Limited and Premium gets the optional navigation system and power moon roof. Even with all the goodies, the Impreza can stay under $25,000 which is less money than a fully loaded Civic or Corolla Matrix. The standard audio system in the Premium models features Bluetooth® hands-free phone connectivity and audio streaming, Radio Data Broadcast System (RDBS), iPod® control capability, USB port, 3.5mm aux. input jack and six speakers.

A short-coming in all Subaru models has been the navigation system. Fortunately, there is a new navigation system which includes a 6.1 inch touch screen LCD display. Even though the buttons are still too small, the voice controls are improved and features like iTunes® tagging, SMS text messaging, and a larger database make this system sing a better tune.

Consumer Recommendation:

While some criticize the lack of “flash” in the new Impreza, I think they have developed a real-world sedan and 5-door hatchback wagon that is perfect for today’s economy. Proven in sales of cars like the new VW Jetta and Hyundai Elantra, people are looking for more substance, more economy and a little less sport. Excellent standard safety features and airbags everywhere protect all 5 passengers. Mileage is up and so is the drivability of this car. In this case, Subaru has proven that less really can be more.

Recognized Competition:

Subaru Impreza 5-door $18,000, Audi S4 $47,000, Chevrolet Cruze $17,000, Chevrolet HHR $19,000, Ford Focus $17,000, Honda Civic $16,000, Honda Fit $15,000, Hyundai Elantra $16,000, Kia Forte $15,000, Mazda 3 $15,000, Mitsubishi Lancer $15,000, Nissan Sentra $16,000, Scion tC $19,000, Toyota Corolla $16,000, Toyota Matrix $19,000, Volkswagen GTI $24,000, Volvo C30 $25,000.

Gas Stats:

$3.54/ Gal avg. January 2, 2012

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

25 City and 34 Highway MPG

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com

Copyright © 2012 – An Automotive Love Affair

2012 Subaru Tribeca Limited AWD (902)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the 2012 Subaru Tribeca Limited AWD Crossover. It is a 7-passenger SUV that continues Premium, Limited and Touring trim lines.

Heated front seats and an auxiliary air conditioning unit with headliner-mounted vents in the second and third row seats is standard. Also standard include a dual-zone automatic climate control, 8-way power driver’s seat; 4-way power passenger seat; leather touches, a 100-watt AM/FM stereo system with CD player and six speakers. All Tribeca models are pre-wired for XM® or SIRIUS® Satellite radio, and all feature a standard console-mounted auxiliary audio jack to connect portable audio players, such as iPods, to play through the vehicle’s audio system.

Don’t you just love all these neat techy stuff. Keeps the kids busy but in some ways it is too much like being in the space shuttle rather than simple transportation.

General Information:

Parts from the US/ Canadian 40%, Japan 35%; Engine & Transmission – Japan. It is assembled in Lafayette, Indiana, USA, Classification is SUV AWD. Cars from Subaru Forester, Impreza, Impreza WRX, Legacy, Outback & Tribeca.

Handling & Performance:

Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC) and a four-wheel traction control system (TCS) and Subaru Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive enhance the driving experience in ways we aren’t really aware of. And you will have to factor that in when it comes to cost.

Styling:

Styling is rather commonplace in today’s world and while simple it has an elegant exterior that gives Tribeca a strong road presence. Electroluminescent dials and subtle ambient interior footwell lighting provide a sophisticated touch. Nice.

Fit and Finish:

Always exceptional.

Cost:

A bit pricey, but as I say you must consider the unseen features that make it more than a pretty face.

Conveniences and comfort:

The second row seat features a tilt-and-slide control on both sides and an assist spring that reduces the effort needed to slide the second row seat. Molded handles ease passenger step-in to the third row, that is a 50/50 split fold-down.

Consumer Recommendation:

If you appreciate Japanese quality and workmanship this Tribeca is in good company and worth your consideration.

Recognized Competition:

Subaru Tribeca $33,000, Acura MDX $43,000, Buick Enclave $43,000, Chevrolet Traverse $31,000, Dodge Journey $32,000, Ford Edge $33,000, Honda Pilot $38,000, Hyundai Santa Fe $31,000, Kia Sorento $27,000, Mazda CX-9 $33,000, Nissan Murano $38,000, Toyota Highlander $37,000.

Good News:

Safety features AWD etc., noted, nice styling, quiet comfort,

Bad News:

Only fair fuel economy.

Standard Equipment:

3.6 liter H6 256 horsepower engine, 5-speed auto transmission, Symmetrical All Wheel Drive, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes with brake assist, electronic brake force distribution, front side and side curtain airbags, LATCH child system, rollover sensor, tire pressure monitor, vehicle dynamic control, 18” aluminum alloy wheels, fog lights, Harman/Kardon 10-speaker audio with 6-CD and XM satellite, Bluetooth, cruise control, tilt steering column, climate control, heated mirrors, wipers with de-icer, Aux audio input, leather wrapped wheel and leather trimmed upholstery, heated front seats, power driver’s seat with memory, 40/20/40 split fold down rear seat and 3rd row 50/50 split fold down.

Gas Stats:

$3.61/ Gal avg. January 20, 2012

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

16 City and 21 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $32,495.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2012 – An Automotive Love Affair

2011 Volkswagen GTI (898)

Overview: 

This week we’re looking at the 2011 Volkswagen GTI 2-Door Sedan. . . meaning you can actually use the rear seat to carry passengers. If this were a Porsche, Mustang or Camaro I’d have to refer to it as a 2-door Coupe because the rear seats can hardly be used to carry passengers. Well, at least you can’t carry passengers with legs and feet, unless they are small kids or midgets.

Don’t get me wrong there isn’t a lot of room in the rear seat, but acceptable space to carry four  passengers, which is typical of the brand to make the most of the space available. By contrast, do you remember cars of the 1960s that looked to be way overweight. Bulky was in for a time in the US, but thankfully that has changed perhaps forever.

General Info:

Parts – US/Canadian 1%,  Germany 75%; Engine – Hungary; Transmission – Germany

Assembly – Wolfsburg, Germany

Class  – Compact

Cars – Beetle, CC, Eos, Golf, GTI, Jetta, Jetta SportWagon, Passat, Passat Wagon, Routan, Tiguan, Touraeg & Touareg Hybrid.

Opinion:

When a driver pulls in between cars way to small to fit safely a few things happen:

1.     It is inconsiderate and ill advised.

2.     It pisses off the driver who is being cut off.

3.     It adds stress to all those around such dangerous drivers.

4.     Worse yet is the “Domino” effect it causes.

The car cut off generally applies the brakes, and each car behind apply their brakes in a delayed fashion so when a driver is distracted somewhere in the chain a CRASH is caused. The culprit of that multi-car crash is that one inconsiderate driver.

Why we get angry at that pushy driver is rooted in our youth and beyond as we wait in lines and someone walks up to the front of the line and cuts in. That’s war. Surely the solution is to make traffic flow more smoothly, but in the meantime it will be necessary to ignore those situations and slow down to the flow of traffic and help to avoid the effects of stupid drivers.

Handling & Performance:

Zippy. Fun to drive. But for greater performance I prefer the TDI engine.

VW says: “The TDI® Clean Diesel engine sips fuel at the wallet-friendly rate of 42 highway mpg. That’s up to 609 miles on just one tank. Impressive. The T in TDI stands for turbocharged, and this engine delivers 140 hp and 236 lbs/ft of torque for exceptional power. It’s a beautiful thing when a love of driving and a love for the environment coexist”.

Styling:

Styling – Not my style, but I am not the last word in style. . . in fact I’ve owned three V-Dubs over the years, two of which were Beetles (bugs). Who would have guessed young people in the 1950s and 1960s would embrace it… but we did. I believe it had more to do with economics for struggling students, mostly, because it was inexpensive to buy and operate.

Wheels – I have a bitch about the wheel design. When did design ignore practicality? Whoever thought up the design of the wheels to stick out beyond the tire should be fired. When you get too close to the curb, (and we all do) the wheel hits the curb instead of the tire. Scrapes will accumulate on the wheel and look terrible very quickly. Someone please tell me why so many car makers have adopted the design. I can’t find anyone who knows, and everyone agrees it is a dumb design.

Fit and Finish:

VW is always good workmanship.

Cost:

It is a little more than I would be willing to pay for a small compact commuter but it is a VW and that means quality to me. As mentioned, I’ve owned several VW’s and they are simply a lot of value for the money.

Conveniences and comfort:

A word about the tire pressure monitor system. I used to think I’d like the feature but over time it has been more of an annoyance than a help. I’ve found too many false readings on virtually all brands tested. My experience is that for no apparent reason the warning light comes on, but I’ve observed that happens especially in the morning after a cold night.

Consumer Recommendation:

My favorite engine is the TDI Turbo Diesel… ‘clean diesel’ and is the direction VW has chosen. That is driven by the high cost of fuel in Europe and now spreading around the globe.

Recognized Competition:

Volkswagen GTI $24,000, Audi A3 $27,000, BMW 1 Series $31,000, Chevrolet Cruze $17,000, Honda Civic $16,000, Mazda 3 $15,000, Mazda Speed3 $24,000, Mazda RX8 $27,000, Mini Clubman $21,000, Mini Cooper $19,000, Mini Coupe $21,000, Mitsubishi Lancer $15,000, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution $34,000, Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback $17,000, Subaru Impreza $17,000, Subaru Impreza WRX $26,000, Volvo C30 $25,000.

Good News:

Very good fuel economy, VW quality, fun to drive with lots of power.

Bad News:

A little pricey, tire pressure system false warnings.

Standard Equipment:

2.0 liter, 200 horsepower 4-cylinder direct injection engine, power steering, stabilization program, electronic differential lock,  anti lock front and rear disc braking system with brake force distribution, 18” alloy wheels, front side and side curtain air bags, LATCH child system, tire pressure monitor, climate control, power heated mirrors, cruise control, trip computer, adjustable height and lumber seats, adjustable steering column, SIRIUS Satellite radio, remote keyless entry system, power windows, anti-theft alarm with immobilizer theft deterrent, fog lights, 60/40 split folding rear seat, heated front seats.

Gas Stats:

$3.49/ Gal avg. December 17, 2011

www.fueleconomy.gov

for more information.

24 City and 33 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $25,749.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2011 – An Automotive Love Affair