Tag Archives: 2005

2005 Toyota Tundra Double Cab LTD 4X4 V8. (535)

OK, on to the next in a series on pickup trucks. The 2005 Toyota Tundra Double Cab LTD 4X4 V8 is Japan’s way of going Off Broadway to say “I can do anything you can do, better, I can do anything better than you. Yes I can, yes I can…” Remember the lyrics to Annie Get your Gun?

Well, can they? Chrysler, GM and Ford would take issue with that and America still has the corner on the truck market. Why, because they are better, older or more experienced? Probably a little of each. But Toyota for one Japanese company is putting the pressure on with the likes of Tundra and Tacoma (publication March 12) while Nissan hits hard with the Frontier and Titan.

To see the seriousness of competition in the truck market one only need look at the heavy advertising push of the Japanese to look as tough as the image portrayed by Dodge Ram “Grab life by the horns”, Ford Tough and “Built Like a Rock” Chevy.

Handling & Performance:

This is serious stuff. Trucks are the business end of transportation and we all expect they are the closest thing to indestructible go anywhere vehicles. They must pull a house, carry a ton of rock and sand or lighten the job of hauling a load of bricks. And all the time it has to do zero to 60 in under 7 seconds. We don’t ask much, huh? Well this Tundra helped me do all those things and you gotta believe the Big 3 are on notice that Japan is here to stay in the truck market.  

Styling: 

A truck’s a truck’s a truck… well perhaps unless you forget about the marvelous Retro Chevy SSR we talked about recently, a truck is rather boring and more utilitarian by nature. And in the end all the hoopla about design means little when considering how well do they do all the stuff a truck needs to do for you.

Fit and Finish:

Great. And that’s ok, but not all that necessary. I’d rather have a 110 outlet in the back of the cargo area and tie downs. Hey this is business, and even if you don’t haul a ton of hay home to the range you need practical goodies to entice me to choose between the competition. Are you listening Truck makers?

Cost:

All trucks are over priced.

Conveniences:

I would prefer, as noted above, more truck adornments than all the luxury items that should be optional. A truck should have neat utility ideas put into action. That’s what real men want in their helpmate.

Standard equipment should include a Skill and Chain Saw, Rotating Hammer Drill, hay loader, and power outlets and cargo lights. I’ll bet if manufacturers asked designing engineers to give a little thought to what “Tool Time” things guys like, they would draw a lot of interest to their products by adding such things.

Come-on guys think!

Consumer Recommendation:

As always, review the application you primarily intend for a trucks use in your life and then find the one that fits best. Ok, so I have a keen sense of the obvious, but often we get distracted by how cool they look and then spend years regretting the choice. Kinda like looking for a wife, eh.

The Competition:

Toyota Tundra $16-33,000, Ford F-150 $20-36,000, GMC Sierra 1500 $18-42,000, Chevrolet Silverdo 1500 $18-39,000, Nissan Titan $23-35,000, Dodge Ram 1500 $21,355.

Good News:

Perceived Toyota quality, V-8 power, roomy and comfortable ride.

Bad News:
Poor fuel economy which you’d expect as the flip-side of having V8 power. 

Standard Equipment:

  4.7 liter 282 hp V8 engine, 5-speed automatic trans, touch select 4 WD system, power steering and power vented ABS front disc and rear drum brakes, tire pressure monitor, fog lamps, dbl wall cargo bed with tie down hooks, rail caps and locking tailgate, mudguards, captains chairs center console, 60/40 split rear seat, AC, AM/FM with cassette and CD players and steering wheel controls, power windows, locks and mirrors, anti theft with remote entry, cruise control and tilt steering wheel.

Gas Stats:

15 City and 18 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $33,075.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2005 – An Automotive Love Affair

2005 Toyota Tacoma 4WD Dbl Cab (534)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Toyota Tacoma Double Cab 4X4. I got on a Truck kick to cover as many as possible and as close together to be able to recall and compare. It was a good opportunity to do this because of the drastic weather here in Southern California.

At my ranch in the high desert I experienced the full force of nature with a lot of rain concentrated in a short period of time. As I watched the evening news show surreal events of houses sliding down hillsides and hillsides sliding down onto houses below I could look out my window and watch the real thing happening in living color, helpless to alter the course of the flowing water and mud.

Although a tractor is the real hero in these situations it is the truck that provides the ability to carry the supplies from Home Depot to rebuild and then haul the trash away. So I scheduled a series of trucks to highlight their unique abilities and features. In the trenches of battle against the forces of nature all were capable as trucks go. A base truck is all you generally need in these cases and fancy does little to improve function. However the double cab or crew cab feature provides the best of both worlds. As to the fancy interior, it is a distraction to have to pull your muddy body into an interior more suited for a tuxedo-clad cowboy. Uh huh. I agree it is a contradiction in terms. Not to say the Marlboro man doesn’t clean up real well.

Aside from the fact that all the trucks I tested during this time were too pretty, there were several thoughtful features as well. Great tie down apparatus and even AC outlets in the back of the bed for using power tools out back. Bottom line: as always, the features you’ll need will be dictated by the purpose intended. Both of the above features would surely be important on the ranch in Southern California and even more important on the ranch in Southern Oregon that is far more remote. If you’re on the north forty fixing fence the AC outlet is better than a battery-operated skill saw, for example. And a heavy-duty trailer hitch and 4 wheel drive is a must for hauling a 6 horse trailer and dealing with those muddy roads ahead without paved detours.

Handling & Performance:

A 245 horsepower V6 powered this solid feeling, big, bulky and strongly substantial answer to the rough and tumble lineup of trucks and it competes effectively with those listed below.   

Styling: 

The appearance speaks more to the street scene with a huge air scoop on the hood that is all show and no go. It is window dressing only with no functionality. It just goes to show you we are more into “Form rather than Function”.  As I’ve said before trucks have never looked prettier than they do today.

Fit and Finish:

Consistent with the competition – all of which agree that the consumer demands car like refinement in how a truck is put together. On a working ranch however such attention to detail is wasted.

Cost:

The Tacoma is priced pretty well with lots of basic stuff like air and manual adjusting seats and the upper end of the pricing is for the four-door crew cab configuration well worth the money.

Options can be added for that Rhinestone Cowboy like upgraded audio, side curtain airbags and a TRD Sport package that will quickly bring the price to $31,000.

Conveniences:

The base appointed Tacoma is just fine as a work truck.

Consumer Recommendation:

Determine the application and equipment needs accordingly. You can cut the cost and still get the job done. For the Beverly Hills contractor, you’ll want to add all the fu fu stuff to look cool. Golfing buddy and contractor, Ken, opted for the GMC Canyon. He’s been happy with it but always looking at what he’ll try next. My favorite in this group to win the coin toss would be the Nissan Frontier, but I would be happy with any in this lineup. I own a Dodge Ram 3500 Dualee but I’ll tell you my intention is to replace it with a conventional 4-wheel drive in this price category, even though I like the Cummins Diesel with 250,000 miles. It’s just getting broke in.

The Competition:
Toyota Tacoma $13-25,000, GMC Canyon $15-28,000, Dodge Dakota $20-29,000, Ford Ranger $14-26,000, Chevrolet Colorado $15-29,000, Nissan Frontier $16-27,000.

Good News: 

Solid, nice styling, convenient 4-door, 4WD for the ranch, comfortable seats and Japanese quality.

Bad News:

Fuel economy could be better. 

Standard Equipment:

4.0 liter 245 hp V6 gas engine, 5-speed automatic trans, 4 wheel on demand system with 2-speed transfer case, coil over shock double A arm front suspension, multi leaf rear suspension with staggered outboard mounted shocks and front stabilizer bar, power assist rack and pinion steering, power assisted front disc and rear drum ABS brakes and brake force distribution, dual air bags, composite long bed liner with steel panel rail caps and removable tailgate deck rail system with adjustable tie down cleats, 60/40 rear bench seat, air conditioning, power windows and door locks and mirrors, AM/FM with CD player, tilt and telescoping steering wheel, engine immobilizer and aux power outlet.

Gas Stats:

17 City and 21 Highway MPG.

Pricing: 

MSRP $25,250.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2005 – An Automotive Love Affair

2005 Jaguar XK8 Convertible (531)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Jaguar XK8 Convertible. Ok, so it’s a chick car. You can verify that by looking at the drivers on the road if you don’t believe me. But hey, guys if that’s the case we should be buying a Jag as a good way to attract the ladies. Really! But men are macho and they would opt for a muscle car and the more affordable Corvette is manlier.

I bring up the Vette because I just tested the C6 and loved it. But when it comes to style and class the Jag can’t be ignored. It is far more elegant and refined in looks. Both are effectively 2-seat sport cars even though the Jag has an ultra small back seat. Ok, so I guess in a pinch you can seat children. The fact of the matter is that is exactly what I had to do when daughter Jen and her 7-year-old girl joined me at the Santa Anita racetrack to watch a friends horse run. The horse won and we had our picture taken in the winner’s circle. Quite a thrill. And this Jag is a winner too. It felt good to hear the Valet suggest that on such a beautiful day we should put the top down. Exactly what we did.

Jen had to move really far forward so Cierra’s feet would rest on the floor. Jen is just over 5 feet and with any other combination of passengers it wouldn’t have worked. But with the Vette it would have been totally out of the question anyway.

If I were promoting the Jag I would say the interior is cozy and you can literally reach every nook and cranny front and back from the drivers seat. If I were bad-mouthing the car, the interior would be described as cramped. For sure this is not for large or tall people, but since the average height of a man is 5 foot 9 and a woman at 5 foot 5 there are more than enough buyers.

Handling & Performance:

This Jag ignores a windy road. In fact you tend to look forward to challenging curves – the windier the better. And 294 horsepower gives that confidence on the highway for power when you need it.

Styling: 

Classic Jag.Timeless design. I hope they never change the look. It is distinctive and truly one of a kind.

Fit and Finish:

Very good accented with the luxury feel of real Burl Walnut wood. This is what adds that touch of class and gives it the elegance only the Real Thing provides.

Cost:

A bunch, but relative to other close competitors like the Cadillac XLR without a rear seat, you may find some justification for the price.

Conveniences:

The convertible top is a delight. It is so easy to use and quickly transforms the mood. Drive away door locking is a small but nice touch. Rain sensing windshield wipers are something you won’t miss unless you’ve experienced them.

Consumer Recommendation:

If money is no object and you want a sport car and will have little need for passengers this is a lovely automobile. It is simply as classy and refined as a sport car can get and one you can’t help but be proud to drive.

The Competition:

Jaguar XK8 $70-86,000, Maserati Coupe $81-85,000, Cadillac XLR $76,000, Mercedes Benz SL Class $90-179,000, Lexus SC 430 $63,000, Acura NSX $89,000, Porsche 911 $69-141,000, BMW 6 Series $70-77,000.

Good News: 

Elegant timeless Jaguar styling, great one button convertible top, fun highway handling and important state of the art Stability control feature (all cars should have it).

Bad News:

Annoying door handles, poor foot clearance around the gas and brake pedals, extremely tight rear seating and tough to get in and out of.

Standard Equipment: 

4.2 liter 294 hp V8 engine, 6-speed automatic trans, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, dynamic stability control, speed sensitive steering, anti theft engine immobilizer, front and side airbags, drive away locking, remote entry, security system, memory settings, 320 watt audio system w/ 6 CD changer, burl walnut trim, power top with glass window, rain sensing wipers, reverse parking control.

Gas Stats:

18 City and 26 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $74,830.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com

2005 Acura TL (526)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Acura TL in the Pacific Northwest. Traveling through the Columbia River Gorge National Park for about 150 miles from just East of Portland to Hermiston, OR is a beautiful sight.

The stress of finding my way around was lessened by the fact it was equipped with a NAV system. GPS is wonderful and this feature is a must for those who travel a lot, or their job takes them to new territory much of the time. Daughter Jenny is in sales and decided to include this option on her Acura TL. That was another reason why I was pleased to be able to give the TL a good test. What a lovely car. It is no wonder this is Acura’s top selling sedan.  

Back in the late 80’s I owned a Lincoln Mark IV with a first generation Navigation system called ETAK. It functioned with cassette tapes you’d select from depending on the locale and if your system wasn’t calibrated regularly it wasn’t terribly accurate. It wasn’t GPS back then and was frankly more trouble than it was worth. It was simply an expensive toy. We’ve come a long way baby.

And this one has all the latest features and has made a simple but important change over others I’ve reviewed. You press a button to give voice status rather than being interrupted all too frequently in other systems.

General Info:

Parts – Engine – USA, Trans – Japan. US/Canadian 65%, Japan 20%.

Assembly – Marysville, OH, USA

Class:  – Midsize

Cars:  – MDX, NSX, RL, RSX, TL and TSX.

Handling & Performance:

A pleasure to drive – comfortable seats on long drive, perfect suspension from the 4-wheel double-wishbone design. Although you will likely never sense the stability program feature, this is one of the best innovations to come along in many years. This is where the computer applies power and braking to the wheels that need it to help you control the car in stressful maneuvers. I’ve tested this feature on the track and obstacle courses and it truly works wonderfully.

Styling:

Very much a contender to BMW and Mercedes and Audi.

Fit and Finish:

In the top 10% of cars we have to choose from.

Cost:

Not bad for this kind of quality.

Conveniences:

In addition to sporting many great features, Acura (like Lexus) has a great customer care program. The price includes a 4 year / 50,000 mile warranty, toll free customer assistance and 24 hour roadside assistance service. The very nice XM Satellite radio initial activation is included along with the first 3-months service for free.

Consumer Recommendation:

It would be fun test-driving all of them, but for me it is a relatively easy choice. I would flip a coin between the Cadillac CTS, Volvo S40 and this Acura TL. Yes, I’ve got it down to three but would be willing to leave the final choice to chance because I know I wouldn’t be disappointed with either of the three.

The competition:

Acura TL $33-35,000, BMW 3 Series $28-44,000, Saab 9-3 $26-42,000, Chrysler 300 $23-34,000, Cadillac CTS $30-49,000, Lincoln LS $32-43,000, Mercedes-Benz C-Class $26-54,000, Volvo S40 $23-28,000, Audi A4 $26-44,000, Lexus IS 300 $29-31,000, Infiniti G35 $30-33,000.

Good News:

Loads of great features, great performance and stability program safety, great styling and Japanese quality, even though it is built in the US where employee care is not as good. I’ve watched them work in Japan in similar industries and since I’ve grown up here I see a difference in work ethics – there IS a difference.

Bad News:

Japanese care and quality will cost you a premium. Is it too much for the difference? Only you can decide that.

Standard Equipment:

3.2 liter 270 horsepower V6 engine, 5-speed auto trans with sequential sport shift, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, power steering, 100,000 miles between tune-ups, dual front and side air bags, side curtain airbags, VSA (Variable Stability Assist), remote entry with security system and immobilizer theft deterrent system, Navigation system with voice recognition, leather seats, 8-speaker surround sound system with DVD and 6 CD and cassette players, XM satellite radio, climate control, 8-way driver power seat with lumbar support, 4-way passenger power seat, steering wheel audio and cruise controls, power window and door locks, hands free telephone interface and homelink system, computer information system, power moonroof with tilt and auto open / close feature, Xenon HID headlights and heated power mirrors.

Gas Stats:

20 City and 29 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $34,900.

2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer EXT 4WD (525)

Overview:
This week I tested the 2005 Chevrolet Trail Blazer EXT 4WD Special Purpose SUV. It occurs to me looking at the number of cars and trucks and SUV’s Chevrolet is responsible for on our roads, one must wonder if there are too many of the line. Why do they produce so many cars? Just an observation.

This Trail Blazer is on the cutting edge of technology and I’m thrilled to see GM take the lead in R&D to improve the cars we drive. I was impressed with the Hy-Wire fuel cell vehicle from GM a year or so ago which they feel will be available commercially in 10-20 years. Personal fuel cell vehicles will trail commercial by about 10 years. Well, it’s a long time, but at least they are forging ahead. In the meantime, they are doing the things they can do, with present development of technology, such as this Trail Blazer that is engineered with DOD, for Displacement on Demand.  

During a Press Conference at the LA Auto Show 2005, keynote speaker, Volkswagen AG Chairman Bernd Pischetsrieder made it clear they don’t really share the optimism for Hydrogen powered vehicles like the Hy-Wire I mention here. Basically he says for all around improvement for the environment and better fuel economy, diesel is the best solution. I have written about this issue in the past, and I believe he is right, and I agree that Bio-fuels will play a big roll in that progression away from fossil fuels until other sources, like hydrogen are more practical.

Back to the present…

General Info:

Parts – US

Assembly – Oklahoma City, OK. USA

Class:  – Special Purpose

Cars:  – Astro, Avalanche, Aveo, Blazer, Cavalier, Cobalt, Colorado, Corvette, Equinox,           Express, Express cargo van, Impala, Malibu, Malibu Maxx, Monte Carlo, Silverado           15,25 & 3500, SSR, Suburban, Tahoe, Trail Blazer, Uplander and Venture.

Handling & Performance:

One of the original in this class, Chevrolet remains one of the best performers. Displacement on Demand keeps GM up with current technology. DOD is a Cylinder deactivation technology that is intended to improve fuel economy without sacrificing performance. It does this by using only half the cylinders during low power demand and kicks in all 8 when power is needed. It shuts down every other cylinder in firing order during light load operation. The valves simply stay closed unless they are needed.

Styling:

I like it. Always have.

Fit and Finish:

Very good.

Cost:

All of the competition is similarly priced. Trail Blazer is certainly on the better end of the cost curve.

Conveniences:

Very good compliment for the money.

Consumer Recommendation:

In my opinion this is the best of the bunch. The price is right, the styling is “Today” and it must be in your list of those to test drive. However, that being said, and although they are not in this class for competition, “Crossovers” (cross of SUV and Mini Van) should be considered here. In a review to come I had the pleasure of testing the New Buick Terraza and in my opinion this breed is better than the SUV. It carries all the SUV look, eliminates the 4-wheel drive and thus improves on gas performance and includes sliding doors that are so much more convenient – and all for the same money or less.

The Competition:

Trail Blazer $28-34,000, Mercury Mountaineer $30-39,000, Ford Explorer $27-38,000, GMC Envoy $30-42,000, Dodge Durango $27-36,000, Toyota 4Runner $27-37,000, Honda Pilot $27-34,000, Infiniti FX $35-45,000, Mitsubishi Montero $35,800.

Good News:

Long history in this class.

Bad News:

Fuel economy is not as good as I would hope for.

Standard Equipment:

5.3 liter V8 engine, 4-speed electronic trans, power steering, power heated mirrors, daytime running lights, dual front air bags, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, rear child safety door locks, battery rundown protection, theft deterrent system, remote keyless entry, air conditioning, rear heat and air, stereo with CD player, bucket seats with 8-way driver seat, folding 2nd and 3rd row seats, power rear glass vents and under floor rear storage.

Gas Stats:

14 City and 19 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $34,270.

2005 Pontiac G6 GT Sedan (524)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Pontiac G6, GT Sedan. I remember when mom owned a Pontiac way back when. In those days it was not politically incorrect to talk about Cowboys and Indians or Speedy Gonzalez, or Pepe Le Pew.

Pontiac advertising used American Indians in their ads showing an Indian with hand held to his brow to shade the glare of the sun enunciating clearly but with an Indian accent, “Ugh, Pontiac heap good car”. Of course us kids would shorten it a bit and make fun of the ad, saying “Ugh, Pontiac heap”. Funny how that made a lasting impression on how it can make you feel about the quality of a car like this Pontiac.

I could hardly reach the pedals on mom’s Pontiac so any car would be cool then. Don’t tell the police I was driving without a license. Of course that was pretty common back then and you could even get a learners permit at age 15 and to us that was an obvious validation of our right to drive. Perhaps that’s where I formed the belief it is a God given right to drive on the highways. After all, I help pay for them. Today the government would have you believe it is a “privilege” to drive. Don’t you believe it, or before you know it, they will blackmail you and use that “privilege” and next make it a privilege to breath or exercise other bodily functions. Then you can bet our wise elected officials would tax those functions too. Whoa, better hold it there or I’ll get on my soapbox and tell you what I really think about our “Out-of-Control” government.

General Info:

Parts 

Assembly – Lake Orion, MI, USA

Class:  – Compact

Cars:  – Aztek, Bonneville, G6, Grand AM, Grand Prix, GTO, Montana, Sunfire and Vibe.

Handling & Performance:

This is an all American muscle car. Yes, it is the last of the Mohechans – (gee, I wonder if that is politically correct to use the name of an Indian Tribe in this context?). Muscle cars imply brute force, which has always been a sign of Americana. Kids have tweaked cars to the max and beyond and our pioneer spirit and rebel attitude has, at the end of the day, worked to make cars and other things better. It is the individual that pushes the envelope and given enough time and money they will make a space ship better than NASA. I’d like to think this Pontiac is a reflection of the demands of our youth on performance, which made companies like General Motors do what our youth had wanted all along.

A criticism of American cars is that Detroit has not changed with the times and technology. That they refuse to get rid of the old “Tried and True” pushrod engines, whilst the rest of the world is moving on to better performing engines. Thus you will notice the rough sounding engine noise on this G6 that is so characteristic of American cars, as compared to smooth running (little or no vibration) from engines in all Japanese cars for example with overhead camshafts and 4 valves per cylinder.

Ok, so old dogs can learn new tricks, and next year the G6 will offer a new 2.4-liter, overhead camshaft, 16-valve 4-cylinder engine with 170 horsepower.

Styling:

This is the best Pontiac has produced in too many years. You gotta love the great look even if you’re not a Pontiac fan.

Fit and Finish:

Plastic, like so many new cars today forced to continue cutting costs. But more importantly, it is done with more attention to detail. The air conditioning vents for example feel good to the touch. I like the ratchet solid settings you get which is far better than in the past and better than much of the competition. Nice touch GM, which shows some sensitivity to the criticism of the past.

Cost:

American made cars remain the best buys from a price to value standpoint. There isn’t much question, in my mind, that for the long haul you are better to pay more if you intend to keep your car longer than 4 or 5 years or you put a lot of miles on each year. Me, I don’t keep a car long and in this “Throw away” world it will be cheaper to replace almost anything after a few years than try to fix it. Consider for example any consumer electronics item or appliance. Seldom is it worth saving the receipt or filling out the warranty card. Why? Because it would cost more to return it or send it back for repair than to simply get the latest and greatest and toss the other.

Repairing a vintage television, record player, tape recorder or most anything you can think of is not cost effective, even if you could find a repair technician above grass level. Cars have just about achieved that status these days as well. Hard to believe, but true.

If you want to pump the price up a bit, an option package is available to add Chrome to the wheels, upgrade the stereo with a 6-disc CD player, power panoramic roof, which is an over sized sun roof that opens like an accordion and OnStar system for $3,145 and a leather package including seats, steering wheel, hand brake and shift knob, heated seats and a 6-way power driver seat for $1,365. And you can add side impact airbags and head curtain side bags for $690 and finally a remote starter system costs an additional $150.

Conveniences:

Ho hum – unless, of course, you go for the optional equipment to jazz things up a bit. For example, you can start the car from the warmth and comfort of your house at the push of a button on the remote keyless fob. Don’t laugh, if it’s snowing or frosty out, you can start the car and it will be warm and defrosted when you walk out the front door and step into it.

Consumer Recommendation:

If you are into muscle cars and like the availability of cars like the fabulous GTO of the 1960’s there isn’t much left to choose from. Camaro is gone now and only this and the Mustang remain in my memory. If you are simply into performance from the car you drive, the competition is rich in the area power off the line, without all the noise and fanfare.

The competition:

Pontiac G6 $21-23,000, Dodge Intrepid $21-25,000, Chrysler Concorde $23-29,000, Hyundai Sonata $16-20,000, VW Jetta $17-24,000, Mitsubishi Galant $18-26,000, Kia Amanti $24,995, Nissan Altima $17-29,000, Ford Taurus $21-24,000, Subaru Legacy $21-29,000, Chevrolet Malibu $19-24,000, Toyota Camry $18-25,000, Honda Accord $16-29,000, Mazda 6 $19-26,000.

Good News:

It’s a traditional muscle car, fast, sporty and great styling, fun to drive, roomy interior and a nice roomy trunk and finally you can’t ignore the great pricing.

Bad News:

Plastic, clunky suspension at times and perceived planned obsolescence.

Standard Equipment:

3.5 liter 200 horsepower V6 engine, 4-speed auto trans w/ overdrive and manual shift mode, sport suspension, 17” cast alum wheels, 4-wheel antilock disc brakes with traction control, front airbags, remote keyless entry, theft deterrent system, power mirrors, spoiler, fog lights, air conditioning, stereo with CD player and 8-speakers, tilt and telescopic wheel, power trunk release, power widows and locks and cruise control.

Gas Stats:

21 City and 29 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $23,300.

2005 Toyota Highlander 4-door Limited AWD (523)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Toyota Highlander SUV. “Oooooh, the weather outside is frightful but the fire is so delightful … when the temperature goes way down low, let it snow, let it snow, let it snooow…” Yes, my test took me on a thanksgiving trek to snow country, but this Highlander was right at home. Bun warmer seats and all wheel drive. What more could you ask for on perhaps the best if not the coldest holiday of the year.

Well, the drive to the Pacific Northwest can be rough, but I’ve gotta tell you, this Toyota turned out to be a pleasant surprise. It was up to the trek and really shined in spite of the elements. Rain, snow and sleet bar the way for a lot of vehicles but that explains the extreme popularity of SUV’s. The reasons are logical but the cost is not. The cost to run such gas-guzzlers goes beyond purchase price, all the way to operation and the cost to society and the world is inestimable.

So why does it appeal to you and me so much? I think it’s because we want the choice to live on the edge “in comfort”. And because of that, we’re beginning to see manufacturers respond to the demand and mitigate the fuel cost with Hybrid’s, DOD technology (displacement on demand), fuel cell designs and simply better running and performing traditional internal combustion engines.

Thus consumers have in a sense pushed carmakers to produce more fuel-efficient engines. Nice job guys, because you have helped, in a round about way, to encourage our fight to battle dependence on the Middle East for oil.

Toyota is doing as much as the rest of the automotive industry to create solutions and provide options for consumers to be able to drive more economically. The Prius for example, that I reviewed several weeks ago, can achieve up to 60 mpg of gasoline. This Highlander’s actual performance for me was 21 mpg on the highway. I know it says 24, but the way most of us drive 21 is about the best you’ll get on this one. The real average for the Prius is about 41 mpg, which is about the best of any car in the world.

Handling & Performance:

Outstanding. There is no way you can argue with near perfection. Toyota just continues to do it better. And although you’ll pay more for the experience, there is no denying the Japanese superiority in car making. They obviously try harder to make them better, and that costs a bit more. All wheel drive does wonders for hugging the road and the confidence in cold, rain and snow is worth the added cost.

Styling:   

Very nice. I really like this addition to their fleet.

Fit and Finish:   

Very good.

Cost:

Pricey if you must have the navigation system at about $2,000 and leather seating will set you back another $1,400, and if you crank up the volume by upgrading the stereo system and CD changer and opt for a moon roof you’ll pop for another $1,100. With a few other ups and extras you can quickly be at $38,000.

Conveniences:  

I guess the only one I missed being in the colder climate is the “Remote Start” feature. But it does apply only to the cold places in this great land, and since I don’t live at the North Pole or Detroit, I can do without it.

Customer Recommendation:

Surely you will not have a problem finding competition. There is plenty and they are all good. I suspect purchase price and fuel economy will be the determining factor, and many today are quality conscious. They want their cars to last a long time. That wasn’t always the case when only American cars were on the road. They truly dictated what people would drive. They were powerful when only the “Big 3” was in the drivers seat (so to speak). Today people have more to choose from and they choose well built over break-often American cars of the past. That is not as true today since Ford, Chrysler and GM have new kids on the block who want to punch their lights out.

The Competition:

Highlander $24-31,000, Chrysler Pacifica $29-32,000, Mitsubishi Endeavor $25-33,000, Hyundai Santa Fe $18-25,000, Suzuki Grand Vitara $18-23,000, Jeep Liberty $18-25,000, Kia Sorento $19-25,000, Infiniti FX $35-45,000, Nissan Murano $28-31,000, Ford Escape $19-27,000, Mazda Tribute $20-24,000, Subaru Outback $19-33,000, Saturn Vue $17-24,000, Honda Pilot $27-34,000.  

Good News:   

Toyota quality, nice design, wonderfully comfortable ride – a great highway vehicle. Roomy, responsive and confident.

Bad News:   

Pricey. Not great fuel efficiency.

Standard Equipment:   

3.3 liter V6 engine with VVT (variable valve timing), 5-speed auto trans with snow mode, full time 4-wheel drive and ABS power assist disc brakes with EBD (electronic Brake Distribution), front air bags, power mirrors, privacy glass, fog lights and roof rack, cloth interior with power front captains chairs, fold flat 60/40 split second and fold flat third row seat, JBL sound system with cassette and CD player with 8 speakers and steering wheel controls, leather trim tilt steering wheel and shift lever, climate control, power windows and locks, multi information display, cruise control, auto headlights, keyless entry, anti theft alarm and engine immobilizer and burled maple wood grain style trim.

Gas Stats:

18 City and 24 Highway MPG.

Pricing: 

MSRP $31,380.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2004 – An Automotive Love Affair

2005 Mazda RX 8 (522)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Mazda RX8 dual rotor rotary engine. Ok, so why aren’t all engines rotary? In theory they make the most sense. Or do they?

Technical Guru Merkel Weiss gives us a little insight into why Rotary engines are not used more. Poor fuel economy for a 1.3-liter engine.

Bad emissions – that requires larger and more expensive catalytic converter.

If the engine breaks it can’t be rebuilt and must be replaced.

On the other hand, Rotary engines are smooth, quite and very capable at high RPM. One must wonder why Mazda didn’t make a mid-engine version for better handling characteristics, especially since it is such a quiet engine.

Well, I’m not terribly crazy about red cars because they attract so much attention on the highway. Police. Know what I mean? In spite of that I gotta admit the color combination is very nice and I really liked the black and red interior and all the aluminum accents on the foot rest and pedals, shifter knob etc. Very nicely done.

General Info:

Parts – Japan 85%. Engine and transmission – Japan.

Assembly – Hiroshima, Japan

Class: – Subcompact

Cars: – Mazda 3, 6 and 6 sport wagon, MPV, MX-5 Miata, RX-8, Tribute and truck.

Handling & Performance:

This is one very capable sports car. It is nimble and quick, Jack, and the short travel shifter helps by making shifts up and down quicker. Many sports cars don’t hold a candle to this fun-to-drive car. It is 238 horsepower fast and the rotary engine is smooth and it just keeps pulling, all the way up to 8500-9000 rpm.

Styling:

I rather like the way they provided a back seat that you can actually get into. The suicide doors on each side make rear entry relatively easy. My 86-year-old mother-in-law could never have gotten into the back seat without them. Only one negative I experienced was that I used it a lot to stow my computer bag, etc., and it would be better if the driver seatback were easier to pull forward.

Fit and Finish:

Very good, which is typical and expected of Japanese cars. But technology and time has made huge improvements across the board. American cars are no exception these days and the only exception I would take on this point, where American cars are concerned, is component parts are not engineered as strong as Japanese parts.

Cost:

Affordable for a well put-together sports car. It is near the top of the order in its class. If the standard equipment noted below is not good enough and you wish to upgrade the audio system, add 8-way power driver seat with lumbar support and heated seats, moon roof, heated mirrors and Xenon headlights, stability control and fog lights you can add $4,250 to the price tag.

Conveniences:

Good. Adequate. And that is ok because you are not paying for the fluff that is so often unnecessary anyway.

Consumer Recommendation:

For the money this has to be in the top few contenders noted below. Interesting that only one American car is represented. Boy, have things changed in this country. In fact it is the only macho offering of the bunch. Somehow I just can’t see Steve McQueen driving any of the others to replace the “Bullet”.

The Competition:

Mazda RX8 $25-27,000, Acura RSX $20-24,000, Toyota Celica $18-22,000, Honda S2000 $32,950, Ford Mustang $19-26,000, Scion tC $15,950, VW GTI $19-22,000, Audi TT $33-43,000, Nissan 350Z $26-36,000, BMW Z4 $34-41,000, Hyundai Tiburon $17-20,000, Infiniti G35 $28-33,000.

Good News:

Comparatively decent fuel economy, well priced, four seats you can actually use.

Bad News:

None worth mentioning.

Standard Equipment:

1.3 liter 238 hp Engine, 6-speed manual trans, rear wheel drive, 4-wheel ABS disc brake system, leather wrapped tilt wheel with cruise and audio controls, console, stereo with 6 speakers, power mirrors, remote keyless entry, front and side air bags, outside temp gauge, power windows and door locks, air conditioning, cruise control, tire pressure monitoring system and theft alarm and engine immobilizer.

Gas Stats:

14 City and 24 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $26,875.

2005 Cadillac STS Luxury Sedan (521)

Overview:

This week I tested the 2005 Cadillac STS 4-Door Sedan. If it weren’t for the fierce competition with everyone launching several new and exciting products, Cadillac could be said to be a leader in the market. But it is hard to determine who is leading and who is following. Surely Cadillac is on the cutting edge and as daring as they have ever been.

American carmakers are back. GM and Chrysler in particular seem to have put the past behind them and are moving quickly to capture the hearts and minds of consumers. Ford has been less exciting.

I particularly enjoy driving the CTS from Cadillac, and although this STS is similar in look, the more sporty CTS is my choice, for me. Some feel the sedan is too bland and could easily be mistaken for a Ford or other lesser luxury car. I don’t subscribe to that criticism and feel the overall look and feel, beyond the external view only, is that it is unmistakably a Cadillac.

Friend Merkel feels American cars break when foreign cars like the Toyota and Honda products don’t. Ok, Merkel is not far from the truth, but it is unclear whether the difference is worth the price gap. Merkel’s engineering experience explains the difference as in the overall philosophy of competing carmakers. For example, the Japanese engineer components so that at the point of breaking, they add to its durability and American car makers reduce durability until the component breaks and that’s the finished product. Thus Merkel’s contends that’s why American cars break when Japanese cars do not. Interesting theory Merkel, or is it still true today rather than when he was a design engineer for Chrysler. I’d be happy to hear from American carmakers to refute that claim.

My contention is that American cars are the best buy today when considering “Overall” performance for the money.

General Info:

Parts 

Assembly – Lansing, MI, USA

Class:  – Midsize

Cars:  – CTS, De Ville, Escalade, Seville, SRX, STS and XLR.

Handling & Performance:

Solid feel and this V6 delivered all the power I needed in every situation, but then I didn’t try to climb Pikes Peak. This is a front engine, rear wheel drive train.

Styling:

Cadillac. Futuristic and bold. I like that and apparently lots of others do too.

Fit and Finish:

Very good.

Cost:

Not bad for a Luxury Car.

Conveniences:

Very complete, but if you want to beef up the features the Luxury performance package is optional for about $8,600. It includes multi driver memory settings, power lumbar, heated and vented front seats, heated rear outboard seats, heated wood steering wheel, Eucalyptus wood trim, studio surround sound with 6-in dash CD changer, advanced DVD navigation system, XM satellite radio 120 channels, rain sense wipers, auto dimming rear view mirror, tire pressure monitor, express open/close sunroof, rear spoiler and limited slip differential. All of the preceding is not really essential in my opinion.

Consumer Recommendation:

Well, I gotta tell you, the pick of the litter for me would be Volvo S60, Acura TL and Cadillac STS in that order. And that ain’t scientific, but based on the general feel of driving all of them.

The Competition:

Cadillac STS $40-50,000, BMW 5 Series $40-58,000, Saab 9-5 $35-40,000, Jaguar S-type $44-62,000, Infiniti M45 $43,000, Chrysler 300 $23-34,000, Mercedes Benz E Class $49-74,000, Lincoln LS $32-43,000, Volvo S60 $27-37,000, Lexus GS $39-48,000, Acura TL $33-35,000, Audi A6 $41-51,000.

Good News:

Cadillac world-class image, comfortable cruiser, solid, fast, good fuel economy for a luxury sports sedan.

Bad News:

Arguable higher maintenance cost over Japanese competitors.

Standard Equipment:

3.6 liter 255 horsepower V6 engine, 5-speed auto trans, traction control, 16 inch power assist ABS disc brakes with stability control, 17 inch aluminum wheels, leather, 8-way power seats, aluminum trim, climate control, power tilt and telescopic steering wheel, cruise control, remote start, 8 speaker Bose audio system with CD player, power widows, keyless entry, dual front and side air bags and side curtain air bags, OnsStar system, ultrasonic rear sensors, theft deterrent system, power door locks, auto dim mirrors with compass and fog lights.

Gas Stats:

17 City and 24 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $40,300.

2005 Toyota Prius Sedan (520)

Overview:

This week I reviewed the Prius that I first looked at in 2000. This 2005 version of the Toyota Prius Sedan hasn’t changed a lot but the look is, albeit subtle, nicer looking in my view. Although the 2001 model was at the beginning, this is now becoming serious and in contention because it is getting the eye from consumers in a more serious way. I encourage everyone to go out and test drive one. For starters it is a bargain for the dough. Why, because surely Toyota is NOT selling them for what it would take to make a profit. The R&D (Research and Development) costs must be huge and no sales would be made if the price reflected that cost. And over how many units would they need to amortize those costs to make a profit? I suspect they are subsidizing the real cost a selling price in the twenty grand range.

Well, you know what I mean. And so, it is for the consumer to embrace the concept of an alternative fuel vehicle. Hydrogen is way off and the infrastructure will take 20 years to get into place to service Fuel Cell vehicles anyway, at a minimum. The HiWire (Fuel Cell Technology) prototype from GM is the hot ticket conceptually, in my view. I love that oversized skateboard design. But that design has been in the works for over 50 years and was first seen at the LA Auto Show in the late 1940’s.

Handling & Performance:

As with prior year models the Prius presents a smooth ride and power is provided by a 76 hp gas engine and 67 hp from an electric motor. The smooth transfer of power is the responsibility of the ECVT for Electronic Controlled Variable Transmission. Ok, so you’re not going to experience head snapping acceleration and it will take over 10 seconds to go from 0-60 mph. From there to a seeming top speed of about 95 it is a slower rate yet. Nothing is perfect, however and the other strong points out weighs the relative slowness. I’ll bet, aside from the quite engine / battery combination, you won’t be able to tell the difference from driving most of the gas only options you have. The Prius starts out on battery and switches to the gas engine when you demand more horsepower.

EPA fuel economy is reverse from typical gas engines, and Prius is better in town than on the highway. The reason, of course, is it uses it’s impressive electric motor torque starting out and kicks in the gas engine, as more power is needed. Honda Insight Hybrid starts off on the gas engine and is assisted by the battery when the throttle demands more power.

This technology is so cool. I like the idea of recharging the batteries from the reverse energy of slowing and braking. You can see that on the Energy Monitor LCD screen.

My comment in 2000 was that “I suspect when gas prices go higher American consumers will lose the BMW and Mercedes Benz” and begin looking to realistic economy. Well, here we are 4 years later and gas has gone from under a buck to over two bucks a gallon. The writing is on the wall and even luxury cars like the Lexus RX 400 and the Ford Escape SUV have Hybrid versions.

Styling:   

Futuristic, and rather likeable.

Fit and Finish:  

Pretty basic but better than many in this price vehicle. The general interior finish is unique, because of the display of information and placement of the speedometer relative to more traditional vehicles.

Cost:  

The Prius and the Honda Civic Hybrid are sedans and thus worth the price of admission. But the Insight has always been overpriced, in my opinion, because it is only a two seater.

Conveniences:  

I like the information LCD screen that shows a graphic of how the power plants are functioning, temp, audio, etc. And an option package is available for $5,000 to include a voice activated NAV system, Smart Key system, side and curtain air bags, security alarm, cassette player and upgrade to 8 CD changer, vehicle stability control and fog lights. Standard however is having many of the controls on the steering wheel. Temperature controls, audio, phone and system information conveniently on the wheel is very convenient. All controls are also available “On Screen” with touch screen control. If you opt for the Nav system you’re gonna love the instant GPS address information with the touch of a button.

Consumer Recommendation:

Look at the competition and if you still don’t get all the education you want, go on line to Google, or Ask Jeeves etc. and look for “Hybrid Vehicles” for a host of information on the subject. Discuss the warranty before you buy and be sure it is the latest and greatest coverage. Batteries are expensive and the drive train is not time tested. The platform has only been on the market for 5 years. The first to hit the market was the Insight in 1999.

You will ultimately be the judge, but take my advice and test drive the Prius and Civic Hybrid’s before you can’t even find one for sale. I haven’t driven the Hybrid VW, and so as others also become available I will review them as quickly as possible. Presently, for me, it would be a toss up between the Civic and the Prius.

The Competition:

Toyota Prius $20,875, Honda Insight $19-21,000, Volkswagen Golf $16-19,000, Honda Civic $13-19,000.

Good News:   

It’s a Hybrid with great fuel economy, and the ride is quiet and comfortable with roomy interior and decent size trunk and fold down seats for even more cargo area.

Bad News:

It’s a Hybrid with allthe unknowns of a new product as to reliability and affordable maintenance; batteries can run $1-2,000, for example. Earlier on warranty offered was better than today’s.

Standard Equipment:   

1.5 liter 76 hp 4 cylinder engine, ECVT, power steering, front disc and rear drum ABS brakes with brake force distribution and assist, power heated mirrors, dual airbags, traction control, climate control, audio with CD player, remote keyless entry with engine immobilizer, cruise control, outside temp gauge and digital clock, LCD multi info display screen with energy monitor, fuel consumption, air, outside tem and audio status, tilt steering wheel with temp and audio controls, 60/40 rear split fold seat, front and rear intermittent wipers, power door locks and windows, cloth seats, center console, 2 auxiliary 12 v power outlets.

Gas Stats:

60 City and 51Highway MPG

Pricing:   

MSRP $20,875.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com
Copyright © 2004 – An Automotive Love Affair