Tag Archives: 2001

2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac 4X4 (333)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the Ford Explorer Sport Trac 4X4. This is essentially an Explorer with a pickup bed rather than its SUV cousin with the cargo area inside. Size wise I see it a lot like the Ford F150 Super Crew. This Sport Trac however, has a shorter wheelbase by 13-inchs. I didn’t measure the bed of the truck but the inside legroom is almost identical between the two, so my sense is that the bed is about a foot shorter too.

The extender device used with the tailgate down gives additional length, but if your cargo is small it could be a problem because things could slip through the back that is not solidly enclosed. That of course is the limitation of its use. This Explorer will have lots of application for those who prefer a smaller pickup but also want to transport more people.

Handling & Performance:

The small size makes this a delight to run around in and also is quite responsive with the 205 horsepower V6.

Styling:

The styling is “Today” and I believe it will appeal to those active outdoors people who might be looking at the Xterra, for example. I question the addition of the rail type running board step on both of these vehicles that seem to be more of a styling statement than a useful feature of a real running board.

Fit and Finish:

For a pickup truck, likely to see extra dirty duty, this Explorer is more like a passenger car in its detailing. I have to point out that American manufacturers are simply getting better in this area. They must be acutely aware of how the Japanese have kicked our butts for years in workmanship and attention to detail. Their workers have a work ethic that is still unspoiled by success. This Ford shows that disparity between workers has changed now and we’re in another fight for our economic lives and we’ve proved that war unites us and “we’re back”. We can thank the Japanese for that wakeup call.

Conveniences:

You get all the comforts of home and this Ford left me wanting for nothing. I got a lot of use from the rear power window with three positions and it’s amazing how the little things count in making the driving experience more enjoyable.

Cost:

Sticker shock hit me right off the bat. I like to have the four doors, but I don’t want to pay for them. Does that sound familiar?

Consumer Recommendation:

I liked all the competition in this class and they are competitively priced, even if all a little too much. You should drive all three, as I did and you’ll find the one that feels best to you. It would be tough for me to choose. Brother John and I owned an auto repair shop for years and for the tough jobs around his ranch, he feels Dodge is the way to go. All things being equal, I’d have to buy American too.

The Competition:

Dodge Dakota 13,910-22,370, Nissan Frontier $11,699-24,399.

Good News:

Good size option, plenty of power, utility pickup bed for a thousand and one uses.

Bad News:

None with the exception of the poor gas consumption. I heard it said that if we got just one mpg better on our cars we wouldn’t need to use the oil reserve in Alaska. Can that be true? If you know, email me and I’ll share your comments with other readers. It’s about time we demanded better from a product that has become a necessity to us all.

Standard Equipment:

4.0 liter V6 engine, 5-speed auto trans, remote power mirrors, rear split folding bench seat, air conditioning, power windows and door locks, power rear window, stereo with cassette and CD, front disc and rear drum antilock brakes, locking tailgate.

Gas Stats:

15 City and 19 Highway MPG.

Pricing

MSRP $24,435

2001 Nissan Xterra (372)

Overview:

This week I revisited the Nissan Xterra that I tested two years ago when it had just hit the market. Well back then the 3.3 liter V6 was a 170 hp engine and to make things worse I tested it in mile high Denver, Colorado and 8,000 foot Evergreen. My racing buddy Price Cobb joined me on a jaunt to the high plains of Nebraska. He made the observation that I passed on to Nissan for their consideration. “Why didn’t they put the Maxima engine in the Xterra so it wouldn’t be such a dog”?  Price didn’t say dog… that was my interpretation.

Well, perhaps they listened because this version comes with a turbocharger that generates 210 horsepower out of the same 3.3 liters, which makes a world of difference. Granted, I didn’t drive this years model at 5-8,000 feet, but the extra 40 horses eliminates the sluggish performance.

I can’t imagine any class vehicle that has been so popular over the years. We Americans are a rugged people descended from pioneers who carved a life out of a very hostile country only a hundred years ago. It’s in our genes to be on the move and to get off the beaten path on occasion. The SUV satisfies our wanderlust nature.

Handling & Performance:

Generally consistent with other SUV’s in its class. I, like most of the car buying public, enjoy driving a 4X4 partly because it gives the impression of “Go anywhere, do anything” kind of driving ability and fun. On a recent Elk hunting trip I tested the Jeep Liberty and was very impressed. These two, in fact all the competition listed here are very similar in statistics. All others do better in gas mileage and power when Xterra is not turbocharged. Although it sits higher than all others, it has the best ground clearance and I didn’t feel it was more top heavy.

Styling:

They all look great and it’s easy to see why so many people buy them. Xterra sits higher than others and has more ground clearance and has that more rugged “Outback” look. I like its unique styling.

Fit and Finish:

Better than the roll out version because it has sales appeal and thus the newer models get more attention to detail.

Conveniences:

There are a lot of gadgets and goodies on the one I tested and the price acknowledges them with a hefty price tag of nearly $29,000.

Cost:

More pricey than when it was introduced and that is the case with the Jeep Liberty new for 2002.

Recommendation:

Look at all the competition. There isn’t a lot in the class and my guess is you’ll be as impressed with the new kid on the block – Jeep Liberty. It’s priced the best right now and I’d snap one up before any price increases sure to happen just like this popular Xterra in just two short years.

The competition:

Ford Escape $18-24,000, Isuzu Rodeo $18-32,000, Jeep Liberty $16-23,000, Land Rover Freelander $25-32,000, Mazda Tribute $18-24,000.

Good News:

Much improved power with turbo, better finish work, unique styling.

Bad News:

 More pricey than original offering, poorer mileage and smaller interior space than competition.

Standard Equipment:

3.3 liter supercharged V6 210 horsepower engine, auto trans, power 4-wheel ABS front disc and rear drum braking system, 2 speed 4X4 transfer case, engine and fuel tank skid plates, power steering, double wishbone front suspension with stabilizer bars front and rear, 5,000 lb towing capacity, 19.4 gal fuel tank, tubular roof rack with gear basket, 17” wheels, fog lights, tow hook, radio with in-dash 6 CD player, tilt leather wrapped steering wheel with audio controls, air conditioning, first aid kit, power windows, door locks and mirrors, auxiliary 12 volt outlets, tie-down hooks, cruise control, center console, rear defrost and wiper, dual air bags, security system, remote keyless entry, child safety locks.

Gas Stats:

15 City and 18 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $28,675.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is movello@earthlink.net.

2001 Ford Mustang GT (370)

Overview:
This week I had a chance to drive the regular every day version of the Ford Mustang GT. They continue in the tradition of the Mustang that entered the scene in the mid 1960’s. They have always been sporty albeit basic transportation cars.

But the price is more than basic. Basic today isn’t even VW that was a cheap car when Mustang was born. Cheap is reserved for the Kia, Saturn, Hyundai, Toyota Corolla and Echo and the like. But for a good old-fashioned muscle car the price is competitive. It really continues to compete with the Camaro and Firebird. Macho guys have to love this kind of car because it is truly the last of a dying breed of car to those of us who learned to drive and fell in love with the automobile in the middle years of this past century. 

Some feel that car prices have gone through the ceiling but they haven’t, even though they are as high as house prices 25 to 30 yrs ago. That is especially appalling when you consider that houses still appreciate in value while cars will always be depreciating assets. Does that mean a car is a bad investment. Yep. But then we buy cars for “convenient” transportation that gives us the freedom to move around easily and provide that sense of adventure.

Handling & Performance:

Raw power linked to a 5-speed manual trans on the console and a heavy foot combines for driving excitement. You sit low and the car sits lower for great cornering. The great exhaust sound is reminiscent of the muscle cars so popular 40 to 50 years ago, and the low roar brings out that machismo in men. The exhaust also helps to drown out the road noise that should have been better insulated at the factory. The scoop on hood gives that racy supercharged look and that identifies the driver as twenty something. Shifting was smooth but I felt the reach was more than it needed to be. It should have been back a bit

Styling:

Youthful as always and that racy look gives a carefree image. They are timeless and always in style.

Fit and Finish:

There was a bit of a vibration under dash that turned out to be the clutch rattling under the floorboard. Closing the doors is tinnier sounding than I expected from a Mustang. The back seat is small and not for long trips but ok for short distances or little kids.

Conveniences:

I like the pass through rear seats on both sides that make the trunk much more useful. This is especially needed for cars with small trunks. I also appreciate center consoles that add to storage for cell phones and sunglasses, etc.

Cost:

Not bad Charlie Brown, speaking of relativity, Albert.

Consumer Recommendation:

Buy the house and grow your investment, but if you want to have some driving fun grab hold and hang on when you mash the pedal to the metal. Ok, enough clues, have you guessed my age yet? Ok, one more. I attended Pasadena High School when it was on the same campus with PCC (Pasadena City College) in Pasadena (not Texas), California, USA. Oh, the competition, it’s like the ladies – I love ‘em all. By the way, you may want to look at the Bullitt version for about $3,000 more.

The Competition:

Acura RSX $20-23,000, BMW Z3 $31-38,000, Chevrolet Camaro $18-29,000, Chrysler Sebring $18-29,000, Mitsubishi Eclipse $18-26,000, Pontiac Firebird $20-32,000, Toyota Celica $17-22,000.

Good News:

Priced with the competition, great ageless styling, decent gas mileage for a muscle car, and pass through seats for those ski trips, etc.

Bad News:

Tinny sounding doors, a bit of road noise and you have to reach too far to shift, small back seat for long trips.

Standard Equipment:

4.6 liter V8 engine, 5-speed manual trans on the console, dual air bags, 4-wheel anti locking disc braking system, anti theft system, remote keyless entry, power steering, air conditioning, handling suspension, stainless steel exhaust, fog lamps, rear deck lid spoiler, dual power mirrors, split fold rear seat, cassette radio, power windows and door locks.

Gas Stats:

18 City and 25 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $23,590.

2001 Nissan Pathfinder (368)

Overview:

This week I drove the 2001 Mid-year Nissan Pathfinder 4X4. I hadn’t looked at this car since the 1997 model in August 1996. I’ve always loved to drive these but the fact that they suck up too much gas turns me off. If they can put a man on the moon they can improve gas performance on cars.

I’m sorry guys, but that’s the truth. Unless of course you subscribe to the theory that we never landed on the moon and that was just staged in Hollywierd.

Well, since gas is sure to be given away soon after we take over the oil fields of the Middle-East SUV’s will be even more popular than they are now. My estimates are that 2 out of 10 cars on the road are SUV’s and there is no stopping them – unless they come up with an engine that burns water. Did you ever notice that bottled water is more expensive than gas? That is even more obvious in the Middle East where a liter of water can cost you about $4.00. Is that insane or what.

Handling & Performance:

Don’t let anyone tell you that Premium gas is a must. It simply isn’t so. I’ve driven all cars with unleaded gas and they operate just fine.

Styling:

Not bad but pretty much stamped out from the mold used by most SUV manufacturers.

Fit and Finish:

Real nice. I can’t say enough for the Japanese carmakers when it comes to attention to detail. They take genuine pride in craftsmanship – the lost art in so much of America’s work force.

Conveniences:

Like many cars today, this pathfinder had auto up/down window controls. I’ve got used to most of them but can understand passengers who’ve had problems stopping the window where they wanted to. I also like the rear door handles that are easy to use. Lots of room in the cargo area but the roof rack is great for this class vehicle made for the out of doors.

Cost:

Way too much with all the bells and whistles like Navigation system, leather package and entertainment center you’ll pay a whopping $38 grand. That’s about $7,000 more than the base price noted below for the standard feature package.

Recommendation:

Put a down payment on a house and buy American, let’s say a Saturn for $10 grand. But if you must buy an SUV save some dough and buy this 2001 where the dealers are likely to deal on now that the 2002’s are out.

The Competition:

Acura MDX $34,700-39,300, Chevrolet Trail Blazer $25-34,000, Dodge Durango $25-36,500, Ford Explorer $21-34,000, GMC Envoy $29-34,000, Isuzu Rodeo $18-32,000, Jeep Grand Cherokee $25-37,000, Land Rover Discovery $33-37,000, Mercury Mountaineer $29-31,000, Mitsubishi Montero $32-36,000, Toyota 4Runner $26-26,000.

Good News:

Comfortable, you can have great features like the Navigation and entertainment systems, powerful, roomy, confident rugged feel.

Bad News:

Terrible gas consumption,

Standard Equipment:

3.5 liter V6 240 horsepower engine, 4-speed auto trans, 4-wheel drive system, 4-wheel ABS power brakes, power steering, heavy duty independent front suspension, stabilizer bars, 5,000 lb towing capacity, roof rack, tow hooks, Bose audio system, 6 disc CD changer, power sliding sunroof, steering wheel audio controls, cruise control, climate control, Homelink Transmitter, simulated wood trim, digital compass and temp. measure, power door locks and windows, power mirrors, remote keyless entry, security system, leather wrapped wheel and shift lever, dual air bags, child safety rear locks and theft deterrent system.

Gas Stats:

15 City and 19 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $31,799.

2001 Toyota Highlander 4X4 SUV (362)

Overview:  

This week I had the chance to look at the 2001 Toyota Highlander SUV. It feels more like a mini van without the sliding doors, but Toyota says it’s “for buyers demanding the image and versatility of an SUV but who prioritize a sedan’s ride, handling and comfort.” In any case you don’t really know where to categorize this one. Is it an SUV or a Mini Van or a Sedan? A little bit of all I guess. At the end of the day I wasn’t terribly impressed with the combination in an attempt to give us consumers what we want. This mutant may well fill the need, but only time will tell if the market warms up to a car without a clear definition as to what it is. Will the consumer be confused and go out and buy a real Sedan, SUV or Mini Van with sliding doors?

It may be a futile attempt at being all things to all people. If, however, Toyota’s target is reached (Women drivers) it will have been a brilliant read of that market need.

Handling & Performance:

It rides like a passenger car or station wagon would be a better comparison. With the 4-wheel drive capability and the road clearance to qualify it to be called an SUV. It should indeed appeal more to women drivers particularly those with family needs who like the idea of SUV styling. They probably realize they will never get off-road anyway and some just can’t warm up to Mini Vans that are often viewed as nerdy.

Styling:

It’s a part of the growing trend for SUV’s to become more car like. Not such a new concept but Toyota takes this consumer demand further by blurring the distinction even more. I’ve heard it said Highlander’s styling is “non-descript” which is a pretty good criticism. It’s anything but risky styling. Ho-hum, perhaps.

Fit and Finish:

Toyota can always be counted on for producing a well put together car. They, like most Japanese auto products, simply are among the best.

Conveniences:

You get what you pay for and because of the Toyota nameplate you’ll get fewer features than may come standard on competitors base models.

Cost:

At first blush it looks reasonably priced, but there is no free lunch folks and if you want the goodies you’ll end up out the door with an invoice nearly $10,000 more than the MSRP noted below for the popular name plate of Toyota.

Recommendation:

If you don’t need an off-road vehicle the mini van is the better option. It will get much better gas mileage and for the family, it is easier to enter and exit for the little people. The styling of the Mini Vans has improved greatly over the years. In my view they are still the most practical family car on the market.

The competition (Order of Preference**): 

(1)Mazda Tribute $18-24,000, (2)Ford Escape $18-24,000, (3)Subaru Forester $20-24,000, (4)Pontiac Aztek $21-27,000, (5)Toyota Highlander $23-26,000.

Good News:

Roomy, strong V6, refined quality product.

Bad News:

Common styling, lazy with 4 cylinders, 6-cylinder is adequate but nothing to write home about and poor gas performance.

Standard Equipment:

3.0 liter V6 engine, 4-speed auto trans, full time 4-wheel drive, dual airbags, power windows and door locks, tilt steering wheel, stereo with cassette and CD player, power windows and door locks, antilock braking system, auto halogen headlights, rear intermittent wipers, multi adjust front Capitan’s chairs, 60/40 split folding rear seat with fold flat and recline feature, cruise control,

Gas Stats:

18 City and 22 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $23-26,000.

 ** – Order of Preference is based on a formula of price relationship to dimensions and standard features and the best overall warranty.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is movello@earthlink.net. 
Copyright © 2001 – An Automotive Love Affair

2001 Volvo S60 4-door sedan (360)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the Volvo S 60 4-door sedan. Son Mike says, “This is way cool dad and I would really like to own this car”. Well, with the image of Volvo as being a super safe car and Mike and wife Lindsey have two young children, it’s not surprising they’d love to own the Volvo S60. It is truly a great family car. But if it were me, I’d opt for a minivan for the young family. I think Lindsey agrees.

But, as for me personally, I really liked driving this car and would rank it in the top ten of my wish list of cars to own. Yes, the minivan is more practical for the family, but I don’t need one any longer since I’m not expecting any more children in my life. But at the same time, I like the comfort and size of a sedan and I’m tired of crawling in and out of the smaller cars I’ve owned, including Porsche, Lamborghini, MGB, Volkswagen and T-Bird to name a few. So it always comes down to what you need at whatever stage of life you find yourself. If you’re 40’ish you may be going through a mid-life crisis and practicality goes out the window. If you’re there I suggest you take some of the budget and buy a Harley Davidson motorcycle. That worked for me even if I did need training wheels.

Handling & Performance:

Tops. It’s like driving a Mercedes Benz. Volvo devotees will likely resent that statement, but it’s the truth and a compliment to both Volvo and Mercedes Benz for achieving unsurpassed levels of quality. Let’s face it, Mercedes is the “Cadillac” of cars the world over.

Styling:

Tops in my opinion. Not to big and not too small and nice clean lines.

Fit and Finish:

Tops again. And that hasn’t always been so. Early Volvos were really poorly made and that can be attested to by observing them on the road. Most look pretty ratty. MSRP does not include simulated wood trim, which I think adds a lot to the interior.

Conveniences:

They left out the kitchen sink, and other options not listed include power sunroof, and passenger power seat and CD player that should be standard.

Cost:

Competitive for the quality and performance.

Recommendation:

When test-driving the competition noted below you’ll definitely want to include this model. Of those listed I would include Jaguar, Lexus, BMW, Audi and Mercedes as Volvos nearest competition.

The competition:

Acura TL $28,880-33,230, Audi A4 $24,540-30,990, BMW 3-Series $26,990-42,400, Chrysler 300M $29,640, Infiniti I30 $29,715-31,790, Jaguar X-Type $29,950-35,950, Lexus IS 300 $29,435-30,805, Lincoln LS $32,845-39,195, Mazda Millenia $28,025-31,025, Mercedes Benz C-Class.


Good News:

Wonderful ride, classy styling, great interior look and feel, arguably one of the safest constructed cars on the market, decent fuel economy in spite of the snappy performance.

Bad News:

I can’t think of anything I didn’t like about this car but it could be a little more fuel-efficient.

Standard Equipment:

2.4 liter inline 5-cylinder 197 horsepower variable valve turbocharged engine, front wheel drive, 5-speed auto trans, Unibody construction with integral high strength steel and passenger safety cage, side impact head protection system, dual front and side airbags, 4-wheel ABS power assist disc brakes, power steering, anti-theft immobilizer ignition security system, 3-stage collapsible steering column, child safety locks, power 8-way driver seat with 3 remote memory settings and lumbar support, climate control with rear seat vents, tilt and tele steering wheel, rear armrest pass through to trunk, remote keyless entry, power windows with auto up and down, heated power mirrors, interior dust and pollen filter,  stereo with cassette and steering wheel controls, cruise control and more.

Gas Stats:

21 City and 28 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $29,800.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com

Copyright © 2001 – An Automotive Love Affair

2001 GMC Sonoma Crew Cab 4X4 Pickup (358)

Overview:
I spent the week driving yet another truck. That’s what I came away with after the first day in this 2001 GMC Sonoma Crew Cab pickup truck. But then I had just tested the Ford Ranger, which I thought was nice, but similarly just another truck.

Ford has the distinction of being far and away the leader in this class selling 6-1. Even so, that doesn’t necessarily mean that Ford is better. I believe it’s too close to call and the majority ‘can’ be wrong. Look at some of our political races where the winner is a turkey.

Well, I don’t want to go there, so let’s get back to what the public wants in the cars and trucks. We all like to have our cake and eat it too, and that’s precisely what manufacturers are giving us in vehicles like this pickup truck. We get the utility of a truck plus car-like rides to boot, even if that doesn’t seem possible. In any case it is possible and you can discard the Kidney Belt, because the ride is more for comfort than carrying a load of rock.

Handling & Performance:

This is really good on the highway even with an empty box. You forget you’re in a truck. It really is impressive and it’s hard not to like this truck.

Styling:

I also like the way it looks – for a truck. It doesn’t have that classic styling of the 1946 Chevy half-ton pickup I used to deliver the L.A. Times in South Pasadena, California. Remember the cabs with the curved side windows? Those were exciting days for styling because we weren’t yet jaded by the ho-hum perfection of the cars we’d drive 50 years later. But back then we were more into looking cool and modifying the designs that Detroit gave us. Today, carmakers have wised up and continue to give the consumer more of what they want. Buyers are more demanding and aren’t satisfied simply because the car actually runs. Heck, they don’t even provide hand cranks any longer as a backup in case the starter doesn’t work.

Another thought is that perhaps we’re more practical minded today in even receptive to “Un-cool” 4-doors. Those two door trucks looked cool but they were really a pain in the rear. The “Crew Cab” may look awkward but they are growing in popularity because they are more functional.

The Sonoma is available in 4×2 and 4×4 versions, with regular, extended or this Crew Cab that is new for 2001. You can have long or short beds in three trims: SL, SLS and SLE. A 2.2L Vortec 4-cylinder engine powers the 4×2 models and the 4×4’s are powered by a 4.3L Vortec V6. Five-speed manual transmission is standard and a 4-speed automatic optional. Anti-lock brakes and variable-assist power steering are standard on all models, but 4×4 adds four-wheel disc brakes.

Fit and Finish:

They don’t get any better and you really will forget you’re in a truck, because they are so car like in features and comfort. The 1940’s and 50’s pickup trucks were all metal inside and basic is an understatement. Most trucks didn’t even have carpet – A rubber mat, maybe.

Conveniences:

They can be equipped with virtually everything available on a passenger car.

Cost:

You pay for what you get. There is no free lunch, as they say, so if you want a car like truck, you’ll have to pony up the bucks.

Recommendation:

I think this will appeal to a wide strata of people from the construction supervisor, the surfer dude who wants to carry a surfboard or scuba gear to the beach, and even moms who will tote the kids or pick up garden supplies from the nursery or a load of hay for the horses. Yes, these things are really versatile, but before you buy one, take a look at the Chevy Avalanche. I tested one recently in Portland, Oregon and will give it a more thorough work out in October. I’ll let you know more then.

The Competition:

Chevrolet S10 $12,849-24,909, Dodge Dakota $14,010-22,370, Ford Ranger $11,960-24,335, Isuzu Hombre $11,360-20,100, Mazda B-Series $12,345-22,085, N5ssan Frontier $11,699-24,399, Toyota Tacoma $11,845-21,965.

Good News:

Powerful V6, great ride, good for light use hauling people and materials, adjustable height seat belts, super comfort.

Bad News:

Small cargo area box, poor mileage and too much money for a pickup truck.

Standard Equipment:

4.3 liter V6 engine, 4-speed auto trans, insta-trac 4X4, double wall box with bedliner, cruise control, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, heavy duty suspension, dual air bags, fog lamps, 4-door cab, stereo with CD and cassette, power windows and locks and mirrors, leather wrapped steering wheel, full floor carpeting, sliding rear window and high back bucket seats,

Gas Stats:

15 City and 18 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $25,768.

2001 Ford “Bullitt” Mustang GT Coupe (355)

Overview:
This week’s car is the 2001 Ford Mustang special edition with a Bullitt badge. Ok, if you were going to the movies in the 1960’s and 70’s you’ll likely remember actor Steve McQueen, born 1930 and died 1980.

Some of his world famous movies include The Magnificent Seven (1960), The Great Escape (1963), Nevada Smith (1966), The Thomas Crown Affair (1968), Le Mans (1971), Papillon (1973). Another memorable movie, for me, was “Bullitt” (1968) and the exciting authentic celebrated car chase. McQueen was an expert automobile and motorcycle racer, and did his own stunt driving as he propelled a high-performance Mustang GT around and over San Francisco\’s fabled hills at speeds up to 115 miles an hour. As with so many fans of McQueen, he was a special kind of guy to me in the images he helped to create.

Ford did a good job of recreating the feeling, sights and sounds of those famous performance scenes in Bullitt. This car will grow on you, even if it comes in only one color, Pursuit Green, which is the color of the car in the movie.

Handling & Performance:

Fantastic. This car will take you back in time and the sound of the exhaust is priceless for those who love the era of the big block performance cars of the 1960’s. It is built to turn you every way but lose, and blow you away with impressive power and handling.

Styling:

If you love the Mustang you will quickly warm up to this classic nostalgic version.

Fit and Finish:

For those of you who have driven or ridden in the original 1967 GT you’ll especially appreciate today’s technology that has made this remake a solid and decided improvement over the older version.

Conveniences:

Relative to early Mustangs that were very basic, this model is far and away well equipped.

Cost:

The Bullitt Badge and touches make this model slightly more expensive than other Mustangs.

Consumer Recommendation:

If you are 50 or older and are into classic cars, grab one of these while the price is right. You can park it next to your Prowler and PT Cruiser that you paid twice the window sticker because you waited too long to decide. As a performance car, this Mustang compares closest to the Camaro, but of all the competition listed, I liked the Eclipse equally as much, but for different reasons. The Bullitt is unique and really sets itself apart from all the competition. Nice job Ford. I’m looking forward to reviewing the T-Bird, coming soon.

The Competition:

Acura Integra $19,400-24,450, Chevrolet Camaro $17,305-28,980, Honda Prelude $23,600-26,100, Mitsubishi Eclipse $17,987-25,407, Toyota Celica $16,985-21,455, Volkswagen GTI $19,275-22,900.

Good News:

Something different in today’s world, real fast, sounds hot and gets twice the mileage as the 1967 version.

Bad News:

You’ll catch yourself driving entirely too fast.

Standard Equipment:

4.6 liter V8 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, dual air bags, ABS, antitheft system, remote keyless entry, power rack and pinion steering, air conditioning, dual power mirrors, unique instrument cluster, split folding rear seat, power windows and door locks, tilt steering wheel, leather wrapped wheel.

Gas Stats:

18 City and 25 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $26,230

2001 Ford Focus Wagon (354)

Overview:

This week’s car is the 2001 Ford Focus Wagon. I\’ve want to get into one since they came out, but you can only drive one car at a time. I thought the styling was interestingly different and rather futuristic. And the price was likely to be real af-Ford-able.

I gave it a good test to Tahoe, California for a week. There were just the two of us traveling, but once there we transported the grandkids, car seats and all. Boy, those things are a pain. A bungee cord and some duct tape would be easier to keep the little buggers quiet. Just kidding dear – I love ‘em.

Little 3-year-old Cierra fell down and scraped her knee and like a good boy scout I had a first aid kit in the spacious cargo area. The designers provided more than enough space for all the stuff women find a need to bring along. Not really true. I’m probably the worst offender, but worse yet, out of all the stuff I always forget something I just can\’t live without.

Anyway we got there no worse for wear and all in all it was a great car and I didn’t have to rob a bank to fuel its 130 horsepower 4-cylinder engine. As you’d expect, that 130 horses did strain a little on the mountain climbs, but no big deal. We got there in the same time that you’d make it in a Mercedes Benz or any other car that costs many times the price of this Ford Focus.

Handling & Performance:

Actually it handled pretty well in large part because it’s front wheel drive, but I don’t like to feel every pimple on the road, which you do in the Focus. Others have mentioned tire noise, which is another way of complaining about feeling the road. ”Well, duh Joe”, Ilona said, “this isn’t a luxury car”. I guess I forgot dear. Sorry.

Today’s cars often have long intervals between needed tune-ups, which is true of this Focus as well. But I doubt many people even know what points and condenser’s are. Nor would they ever consider changing spark plug wires. Well you still need to change the oil regularly, but lube joints are as foreign and remote to most drivers as Siberia, Russia.

Styling:

Different and rather unique. You can\’t miss it on the highway and like the old days, you get a car with some differentiation in appearance from other cars. When I first saw the Focus I thought of the radical styling of the Pontiac Aztek that still looks a little ugly to me. But I’m getting used to both of these futuristic body styles. Look for the Chevrolet Avalanche for another adventure in different design.

Fit and Finish:

Good for the money. It seems as though the shake; rattle and roll went out with the cars of the “good old days”. Plastic and other synthetic materials plus the experience of a hundred years of making these things, allow us to expect and receive the most solid, squeak free ride ever in auto history. Of course auto buyers weren’t as picky in the early days and a few squeaks were almost expected. After all, they traded in a horse and buggy or wagon to buy that new fangled contraption with all the horses under the bonnet (hood). Well, they wouldn’t complain back then, but I will in saying the hatches and doors sound a little “tinny”. On the positive side, however, they designed in lots of cubbyholes for storage and I appreciate that everything is laid out well.

Conveniences:

Not a lot, but enough. Reminds be of my favorite quote; “Enough is abundance to the wise”. So I’ll try to be a little wiser about my next car purchase and live with a few less gadgets, and use the money I save for a trip to Hawaii.

Cost:

Not too bad. Overall it is impressive that they can make a car with so much for so little money. Thanks to Ford the average car buyer has been buying affordable cars since the Model T and A at the turn of the 20th Century.

Consumer Recommendation:

Cars of this price range are Economy cars and they have their place in the lineup of what we have to choose from. Like I always say, the car you buy should fit your need. It truly is a good young family car, or those on a strict budget as evidenced by the fact that 50% of Focus sales have been to young drivers (35 and younger). I remember buying a Ford Fiesta back in the late 1970’s and this Focus reminds me of that car, albeit an upscale version. That was a great car and if daughter Jennifer hadn’t rolled it, it would still be running today.

The Competition:

Daewoo Nubira $11,699-15,199,Hyundai Elantra Wagon $12,499, Saturn SW $14,290, Subaru Impreza Wagon $17,495-23,495, Suzuki Esteem Wagon $13699-16,499.

Good News:

Affordable new car pricing, 100,000-mile tune up interval, good gas mileage.

Bad News:

Road noise, tinny sound from doors and especially the rear hatch.

Standard Equipment:

2.0 Liter 4-cylinder engine, auto transaxle front wheel drive, dual air bags, child safety door locks, remote keyless entry, theft system, power rack and pinion steering, power front discs and rear drum ABS braking system, independent suspension, rear window defroster with wiper / washer, luggage rack, dual power mirrors, air conditioning, stereo with CD player and power windows.

Gas Stats:

25 City and 31 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $17,795.

2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Convertible (352)

Overview:

This week we’re visiting friends in the 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Convertible. If you read my reviews often you know that I have a love for speed. Just ask anyone who drives with me.Fortunately each year I get to drive all new cars on a racetrack, so I don’t feel the need to do it on the highways. I try to drive according to the posted speed laws, just like you. Right?

Handling & Performance:

The high-line GT model has a 200-horsepower V6, and that’s the one I tested, with the manual trans. You’ll have to pay an extra $1,000 if you want an automatic. The GT has a stiffer suspension than other models and bigger tires for better handling.

If fuel economy is a consideration for you, the 4-cylinder model with the manual transmission provides a few more miles per gallon at 22 city and 30 highway.

Stopping distances are good in this GT because of 4-wheel disc brakes necessary for performance driving and more demanding braking conditions.

Styling:

They have provided adequate room for two 6-footers, but don’t try to put them in the rear seat. The doors are long and make it awkward to get in and out, especially in tight parking areas. Front seats are comfortable and supportive in the curves.

The trunk spoiler looks cool, but it blocks your rear view with the top up, because the back window is small. But the rear window is glass and I’d rather have it small and glass than large and plastic.

Fit and Finish:

Typical Japanese quality in this area of construction. I’m rarely disappointed in how well them put things together. They’ve learned well from their conquering hero’s, eh.

Conveniences:

You get what you pay for, and this Eclipse is competitive in what they give you.

Cost:

Not bad, unless you opt for the premium package that includes ABS brakes, upgraded Stereo with cassette and 4 disc in-dash CD changer, leather seats, power drivers seat and side air bags where you’ll add $2,370.

Recommendation:

If a sports car fits your need at this time in your life, this is the best of the bunch, in my humble opinion. Plus, it has unique styling that stands out from the crowd in this price range. I’d be interested in your opinion if you test-drive some of the competition.

The Competition:

Acura Integra $19,400-24,450, Audi TT $31,200-38,900, BMW Z3 $31,300-37,900, Chevrolet Camaro $17,305-28,980, Ford Mustang $17,095-32,605, Honda Prelude $23,600-26,100, Mazda MX-5 Miata $21,180-25,715, Mercury Cougar $16,700-22,050, Toyota Celica $16,985-21,455.

Good News:

Fast V6, state of art soft top, great ride and solid feel, handles like a sports car should, distinctive styling

Bad News:

Small trunk and opening, small rear seat.

Standard Equipment:

3.0 liter V6 engine, 5-speed manual trans, dual airbags, anti theft, power rack and pinion steering, 4-wheel sport tuned independent steering, power ventilated disc brakes, power soft top, air conditioning, power windows, locks and side mirrors, Infinity stereo with CD player, 10-way adjustable driver seat, adjusting steering column, keyless entry, cruise control, leather wrapped steering wheel, power antenna.

Gas Stats:

20 City and 27 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $25,407