About: Autolove

Joe Mavilia is a syndicated columnist with more than 35 years in the automotive industry. He is a member of the Motor Press Guild and Automotive Press Association. His reviews have been published in print media including the Los Angeles Times, The Golden Transcript - Colorado, La Feria News - Texas, The Pasadena Weekly - California, and others around the country, including www.theweekenddrive.com where he is the West Coast Editor. Reviews and Opinion Columns may also be seen in Sunnews.org and The Country Journal every week in the Antelope Valley, CA. I hope they are helpful

Recent Posts by Autolove

2001 Toyota Highlander 4X4 SUV (362)

No comments
2001 Toyota Highlander 4X4 SUV (362)

Overview:  

This week I had the chance to look at the 2001 Toyota Highlander SUV. It feels more like a mini van without the sliding doors, but Toyota says it’s “for buyers demanding the image and versatility of an SUV but who prioritize a sedan’s ride, handling and comfort.” In any case you don’t really know where to categorize this one. Is it an SUV or a Mini Van or a Sedan? A little bit of all I guess. At the end of the day I wasn’t terribly impressed with the combination in an attempt to give us consumers what we want. This mutant may well fill the need, but only time will tell if the market warms up to a car without a clear definition as to what it is. Will the consumer be confused and go out and buy a real Sedan, SUV or Mini Van with sliding doors?

It may be a futile attempt at being all things to all people. If, however, Toyota’s target is reached (Women drivers) it will have been a brilliant read of that market need.

Handling & Performance:

It rides like a passenger car or station wagon would be a better comparison. With the 4-wheel drive capability and the road clearance to qualify it to be called an SUV. It should indeed appeal more to women drivers particularly those with family needs who like the idea of SUV styling. They probably realize they will never get off-road anyway and some just can’t warm up to Mini Vans that are often viewed as nerdy.

Styling:

It’s a part of the growing trend for SUV’s to become more car like. Not such a new concept but Toyota takes this consumer demand further by blurring the distinction even more. I’ve heard it said Highlander’s styling is “non-descript” which is a pretty good criticism. It’s anything but risky styling. Ho-hum, perhaps.

Fit and Finish:

Toyota can always be counted on for producing a well put together car. They, like most Japanese auto products, simply are among the best.

Conveniences:

You get what you pay for and because of the Toyota nameplate you’ll get fewer features than may come standard on competitors base models.

Cost:

At first blush it looks reasonably priced, but there is no free lunch folks and if you want the goodies you’ll end up out the door with an invoice nearly $10,000 more than the MSRP noted below for the popular name plate of Toyota.

Recommendation:

If you don’t need an off-road vehicle the mini van is the better option. It will get much better gas mileage and for the family, it is easier to enter and exit for the little people. The styling of the Mini Vans has improved greatly over the years. In my view they are still the most practical family car on the market.

The competition (Order of Preference**): 

(1)Mazda Tribute $18-24,000, (2)Ford Escape $18-24,000, (3)Subaru Forester $20-24,000, (4)Pontiac Aztek $21-27,000, (5)Toyota Highlander $23-26,000.

Good News:

Roomy, strong V6, refined quality product.

Bad News:

Common styling, lazy with 4 cylinders, 6-cylinder is adequate but nothing to write home about and poor gas performance.

Standard Equipment:

3.0 liter V6 engine, 4-speed auto trans, full time 4-wheel drive, dual airbags, power windows and door locks, tilt steering wheel, stereo with cassette and CD player, power windows and door locks, antilock braking system, auto halogen headlights, rear intermittent wipers, multi adjust front Capitan’s chairs, 60/40 split folding rear seat with fold flat and recline feature, cruise control,

Gas Stats:

18 City and 22 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $23-26,000.

 ** – Order of Preference is based on a formula of price relationship to dimensions and standard features and the best overall warranty.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is movello@earthlink.net. 
Copyright © 2001 – An Automotive Love Affair

2001 Volvo S60 4-door sedan (360)

No comments
2001 Volvo S60 4-door sedan (360)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the Volvo S 60 4-door sedan. Son Mike says, “This is way cool dad and I would really like to own this car”. Well, with the image of Volvo as being a super safe car and Mike and wife Lindsey have two young children, it’s not surprising they’d love to own the Volvo S60. It is truly a great family car. But if it were me, I’d opt for a minivan for the young family. I think Lindsey agrees.

But, as for me personally, I really liked driving this car and would rank it in the top ten of my wish list of cars to own. Yes, the minivan is more practical for the family, but I don’t need one any longer since I’m not expecting any more children in my life. But at the same time, I like the comfort and size of a sedan and I’m tired of crawling in and out of the smaller cars I’ve owned, including Porsche, Lamborghini, MGB, Volkswagen and T-Bird to name a few. So it always comes down to what you need at whatever stage of life you find yourself. If you’re 40’ish you may be going through a mid-life crisis and practicality goes out the window. If you’re there I suggest you take some of the budget and buy a Harley Davidson motorcycle. That worked for me even if I did need training wheels.

Handling & Performance:

Tops. It’s like driving a Mercedes Benz. Volvo devotees will likely resent that statement, but it’s the truth and a compliment to both Volvo and Mercedes Benz for achieving unsurpassed levels of quality. Let’s face it, Mercedes is the “Cadillac” of cars the world over.

Styling:

Tops in my opinion. Not to big and not too small and nice clean lines.

Fit and Finish:

Tops again. And that hasn’t always been so. Early Volvos were really poorly made and that can be attested to by observing them on the road. Most look pretty ratty. MSRP does not include simulated wood trim, which I think adds a lot to the interior.

Conveniences:

They left out the kitchen sink, and other options not listed include power sunroof, and passenger power seat and CD player that should be standard.

Cost:

Competitive for the quality and performance.

Recommendation:

When test-driving the competition noted below you’ll definitely want to include this model. Of those listed I would include Jaguar, Lexus, BMW, Audi and Mercedes as Volvos nearest competition.

The competition:

Acura TL $28,880-33,230, Audi A4 $24,540-30,990, BMW 3-Series $26,990-42,400, Chrysler 300M $29,640, Infiniti I30 $29,715-31,790, Jaguar X-Type $29,950-35,950, Lexus IS 300 $29,435-30,805, Lincoln LS $32,845-39,195, Mazda Millenia $28,025-31,025, Mercedes Benz C-Class.


Good News:

Wonderful ride, classy styling, great interior look and feel, arguably one of the safest constructed cars on the market, decent fuel economy in spite of the snappy performance.

Bad News:

I can’t think of anything I didn’t like about this car but it could be a little more fuel-efficient.

Standard Equipment:

2.4 liter inline 5-cylinder 197 horsepower variable valve turbocharged engine, front wheel drive, 5-speed auto trans, Unibody construction with integral high strength steel and passenger safety cage, side impact head protection system, dual front and side airbags, 4-wheel ABS power assist disc brakes, power steering, anti-theft immobilizer ignition security system, 3-stage collapsible steering column, child safety locks, power 8-way driver seat with 3 remote memory settings and lumbar support, climate control with rear seat vents, tilt and tele steering wheel, rear armrest pass through to trunk, remote keyless entry, power windows with auto up and down, heated power mirrors, interior dust and pollen filter,  stereo with cassette and steering wheel controls, cruise control and more.

Gas Stats:

21 City and 28 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $29,800.

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com

Copyright © 2001 – An Automotive Love Affair

2001 GMC Sonoma Crew Cab 4X4 Pickup (358)

No comments
2001 GMC Sonoma Crew Cab 4X4 Pickup (358)

Overview:
I spent the week driving yet another truck. That’s what I came away with after the first day in this 2001 GMC Sonoma Crew Cab pickup truck. But then I had just tested the Ford Ranger, which I thought was nice, but similarly just another truck.

Ford has the distinction of being far and away the leader in this class selling 6-1. Even so, that doesn’t necessarily mean that Ford is better. I believe it’s too close to call and the majority ‘can’ be wrong. Look at some of our political races where the winner is a turkey.

Well, I don’t want to go there, so let’s get back to what the public wants in the cars and trucks. We all like to have our cake and eat it too, and that’s precisely what manufacturers are giving us in vehicles like this pickup truck. We get the utility of a truck plus car-like rides to boot, even if that doesn’t seem possible. In any case it is possible and you can discard the Kidney Belt, because the ride is more for comfort than carrying a load of rock.

Handling & Performance:

This is really good on the highway even with an empty box. You forget you’re in a truck. It really is impressive and it’s hard not to like this truck.

Styling:

I also like the way it looks – for a truck. It doesn’t have that classic styling of the 1946 Chevy half-ton pickup I used to deliver the L.A. Times in South Pasadena, California. Remember the cabs with the curved side windows? Those were exciting days for styling because we weren’t yet jaded by the ho-hum perfection of the cars we’d drive 50 years later. But back then we were more into looking cool and modifying the designs that Detroit gave us. Today, carmakers have wised up and continue to give the consumer more of what they want. Buyers are more demanding and aren’t satisfied simply because the car actually runs. Heck, they don’t even provide hand cranks any longer as a backup in case the starter doesn’t work.

Another thought is that perhaps we’re more practical minded today in even receptive to “Un-cool” 4-doors. Those two door trucks looked cool but they were really a pain in the rear. The “Crew Cab” may look awkward but they are growing in popularity because they are more functional.

The Sonoma is available in 4×2 and 4×4 versions, with regular, extended or this Crew Cab that is new for 2001. You can have long or short beds in three trims: SL, SLS and SLE. A 2.2L Vortec 4-cylinder engine powers the 4×2 models and the 4×4’s are powered by a 4.3L Vortec V6. Five-speed manual transmission is standard and a 4-speed automatic optional. Anti-lock brakes and variable-assist power steering are standard on all models, but 4×4 adds four-wheel disc brakes.

Fit and Finish:

They don’t get any better and you really will forget you’re in a truck, because they are so car like in features and comfort. The 1940’s and 50’s pickup trucks were all metal inside and basic is an understatement. Most trucks didn’t even have carpet – A rubber mat, maybe.

Conveniences:

They can be equipped with virtually everything available on a passenger car.

Cost:

You pay for what you get. There is no free lunch, as they say, so if you want a car like truck, you’ll have to pony up the bucks.

Recommendation:

I think this will appeal to a wide strata of people from the construction supervisor, the surfer dude who wants to carry a surfboard or scuba gear to the beach, and even moms who will tote the kids or pick up garden supplies from the nursery or a load of hay for the horses. Yes, these things are really versatile, but before you buy one, take a look at the Chevy Avalanche. I tested one recently in Portland, Oregon and will give it a more thorough work out in October. I’ll let you know more then.

The Competition:

Chevrolet S10 $12,849-24,909, Dodge Dakota $14,010-22,370, Ford Ranger $11,960-24,335, Isuzu Hombre $11,360-20,100, Mazda B-Series $12,345-22,085, N5ssan Frontier $11,699-24,399, Toyota Tacoma $11,845-21,965.

Good News:

Powerful V6, great ride, good for light use hauling people and materials, adjustable height seat belts, super comfort.

Bad News:

Small cargo area box, poor mileage and too much money for a pickup truck.

Standard Equipment:

4.3 liter V6 engine, 4-speed auto trans, insta-trac 4X4, double wall box with bedliner, cruise control, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, heavy duty suspension, dual air bags, fog lamps, 4-door cab, stereo with CD and cassette, power windows and locks and mirrors, leather wrapped steering wheel, full floor carpeting, sliding rear window and high back bucket seats,

Gas Stats:

15 City and 18 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $25,768.

2002 Chevrolet Trail Blazer (357)

No comments
2002 Chevrolet Trail Blazer (357)

Overview:
This week we’re looking at the 2002 Chevy Trail Blazer. Can you believe the year is just about gone? In any case, it’s been a while since I drove this model, and when I think of an SUV I always think of the Blazer as a major contender right behind the granddaddy of them all, the Jeep. Also, I owned one back in the 1980’s when there were very few SUV’s being produced and by only a few carmakers.

Today just about every manufacturer has entered the market that is simply too large to ignore even if this huge gas-guzzler is sure to run into trouble when gas prices rise to world levels. I suspect car companies have decided we’ll learn to live with the cost increases and eat less or sleep in the rear of our beloved SUV. I don’t think so, but only time will tell.

Not much has changed in the overall features and functionality of the SUV except the 4X4 is more transparent to the driver. Most are “on-demand” now and of course they are more luxurious as the popularity of this versatile “Car/Truck” spreads to the rich and famous. They now can buy a high end Mercedes, Cadillac, Lexus, BMW, Infiniti, Lincoln and even Hummer at prices ranging from $50-100,000.

Of course when you spend that much for the vehicle, gas prices and poor vehicle gas economy aren’t as important. That’s what I call a regressive tax. Lower income folks pay proportionately more to drive to work if they opt for the safety and convenience of the SUV’s they made popular.

Handling & Performance:

hey all handle pretty much the same unless you believe the poor roll over rating Mitsubishi’s SUV got recently. I drove it and never felt in danger, but then I’ve also driven the Ford SUV’s with Firestone tires and don’t see what all the hoopla is about either. I did however agree with the roll over problems of the Suzuki Samari several years ago because they were simply too top heavy and the track was not wide enough. I never felt comfortable in that little SUV.

Some differentiation exists however in this new 2002 Trail Blazer. One that shines through is its rocket acceleration provided by a 270 horsepower six-cylinder engine. It is flat impressive for this class vehicle. Secondly, the new design sets that engine 6 inches lower that promises to add significantly to the stability of this model. Since I tested it on and off road I’m confident about its great ride characteristics. The only real negative that surfaced is that the power steering is a little light and loosey-goosey. I like to feel the road a bit more and if the power assist is too dominant you lose that feel.

Styling:

Grandfather Jeep will always be the standard by which I will compare all SUV’s. They really don’t get any better even considering Mercedes and Lexus who have tried to combine the design to be even more car like. At the same time Nissan Xterra figures the youth of the world will embrace the rugged off road and out of doors lifestyle. In any case, this Trail Blazer looks great and instills confidence in the overall package Chevrolet is delivering to us consumers. It’s classy while retaining its image as a capable off road contender.

Fit and Finish:

First cabin. You can’t really find fault with the attention to detail that gives the Trail Blazer that super solid feel. That wasn’t always the case with the early Blazers like the one I owned, while not a bucket of bolts it was unsophisticated and rather basic by comparison.

Conveniences:

Top of the heap.

Cost:

Ditto. You have to pay for all those goodies.

Recommendation:

If you’ve got the bucks and like GM and specifically Chevrolet, this is a very classy Sport Utility. All are priced very close and though I’ve driven them all, the menu is large and my appetite could be satisfied with any of them. Personal preference in styling and manufacturer will be your best guide. Some say “Buy American” and since the quality is real close now I would tend to support the US Economy and help us to reduce our balance of trade.

The Competition:

Dodge Durango $26,650-28,770, Ford Explorer $21,165-34,085, Honda Passport $23,000-30,500, Isuzu Rodeo $18,290-31,730, Jeep Grand Cherokee $27,300-35,095, Mitsubishi Montero Sport $22,747-32,777, Nissan Pathfinder $27,349-31,799, Toyota 4Runner $26,335-36,105.

Good News:

Nice styling, super performance, as good as they get.

Bad News:

Poor gas mileage, running boards that are pointless and the steering is a little loose feeling.

Standard Equipment:

4.2 liter 270 hp inline 6 cylinder engine, auto transmission, dual front and side airbags, ABS brakes, air-conditioning, power windows and door locks, tilt wheel, cruise control, power leather seats, radio with cassette and CD player, luggage rack,

Gas Stats:

Not published. My guess -“not good”

18 City and 22 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $33,730.

2001 Ford “Bullitt” Mustang GT Coupe (355)

No comments
2001 Ford “Bullitt” Mustang GT Coupe (355)

Overview:
This week’s car is the 2001 Ford Mustang special edition with a Bullitt badge. Ok, if you were going to the movies in the 1960’s and 70’s you’ll likely remember actor Steve McQueen, born 1930 and died 1980.

Some of his world famous movies include The Magnificent Seven (1960), The Great Escape (1963), Nevada Smith (1966), The Thomas Crown Affair (1968), Le Mans (1971), Papillon (1973). Another memorable movie, for me, was “Bullitt” (1968) and the exciting authentic celebrated car chase. McQueen was an expert automobile and motorcycle racer, and did his own stunt driving as he propelled a high-performance Mustang GT around and over San Francisco\’s fabled hills at speeds up to 115 miles an hour. As with so many fans of McQueen, he was a special kind of guy to me in the images he helped to create.

Ford did a good job of recreating the feeling, sights and sounds of those famous performance scenes in Bullitt. This car will grow on you, even if it comes in only one color, Pursuit Green, which is the color of the car in the movie.

Handling & Performance:

Fantastic. This car will take you back in time and the sound of the exhaust is priceless for those who love the era of the big block performance cars of the 1960’s. It is built to turn you every way but lose, and blow you away with impressive power and handling.

Styling:

If you love the Mustang you will quickly warm up to this classic nostalgic version.

Fit and Finish:

For those of you who have driven or ridden in the original 1967 GT you’ll especially appreciate today’s technology that has made this remake a solid and decided improvement over the older version.

Conveniences:

Relative to early Mustangs that were very basic, this model is far and away well equipped.

Cost:

The Bullitt Badge and touches make this model slightly more expensive than other Mustangs.

Consumer Recommendation:

If you are 50 or older and are into classic cars, grab one of these while the price is right. You can park it next to your Prowler and PT Cruiser that you paid twice the window sticker because you waited too long to decide. As a performance car, this Mustang compares closest to the Camaro, but of all the competition listed, I liked the Eclipse equally as much, but for different reasons. The Bullitt is unique and really sets itself apart from all the competition. Nice job Ford. I’m looking forward to reviewing the T-Bird, coming soon.

The Competition:

Acura Integra $19,400-24,450, Chevrolet Camaro $17,305-28,980, Honda Prelude $23,600-26,100, Mitsubishi Eclipse $17,987-25,407, Toyota Celica $16,985-21,455, Volkswagen GTI $19,275-22,900.

Good News:

Something different in today’s world, real fast, sounds hot and gets twice the mileage as the 1967 version.

Bad News:

You’ll catch yourself driving entirely too fast.

Standard Equipment:

4.6 liter V8 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, dual air bags, ABS, antitheft system, remote keyless entry, power rack and pinion steering, air conditioning, dual power mirrors, unique instrument cluster, split folding rear seat, power windows and door locks, tilt steering wheel, leather wrapped wheel.

Gas Stats:

18 City and 25 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $26,230

2001 Ford Focus Wagon (354)

No comments
2001 Ford Focus Wagon (354)

Overview:

This week’s car is the 2001 Ford Focus Wagon. I\’ve want to get into one since they came out, but you can only drive one car at a time. I thought the styling was interestingly different and rather futuristic. And the price was likely to be real af-Ford-able.

I gave it a good test to Tahoe, California for a week. There were just the two of us traveling, but once there we transported the grandkids, car seats and all. Boy, those things are a pain. A bungee cord and some duct tape would be easier to keep the little buggers quiet. Just kidding dear – I love ‘em.

Little 3-year-old Cierra fell down and scraped her knee and like a good boy scout I had a first aid kit in the spacious cargo area. The designers provided more than enough space for all the stuff women find a need to bring along. Not really true. I’m probably the worst offender, but worse yet, out of all the stuff I always forget something I just can\’t live without.

Anyway we got there no worse for wear and all in all it was a great car and I didn’t have to rob a bank to fuel its 130 horsepower 4-cylinder engine. As you’d expect, that 130 horses did strain a little on the mountain climbs, but no big deal. We got there in the same time that you’d make it in a Mercedes Benz or any other car that costs many times the price of this Ford Focus.

Handling & Performance:

Actually it handled pretty well in large part because it’s front wheel drive, but I don’t like to feel every pimple on the road, which you do in the Focus. Others have mentioned tire noise, which is another way of complaining about feeling the road. ”Well, duh Joe”, Ilona said, “this isn’t a luxury car”. I guess I forgot dear. Sorry.

Today’s cars often have long intervals between needed tune-ups, which is true of this Focus as well. But I doubt many people even know what points and condenser’s are. Nor would they ever consider changing spark plug wires. Well you still need to change the oil regularly, but lube joints are as foreign and remote to most drivers as Siberia, Russia.

Styling:

Different and rather unique. You can\’t miss it on the highway and like the old days, you get a car with some differentiation in appearance from other cars. When I first saw the Focus I thought of the radical styling of the Pontiac Aztek that still looks a little ugly to me. But I’m getting used to both of these futuristic body styles. Look for the Chevrolet Avalanche for another adventure in different design.

Fit and Finish:

Good for the money. It seems as though the shake; rattle and roll went out with the cars of the “good old days”. Plastic and other synthetic materials plus the experience of a hundred years of making these things, allow us to expect and receive the most solid, squeak free ride ever in auto history. Of course auto buyers weren’t as picky in the early days and a few squeaks were almost expected. After all, they traded in a horse and buggy or wagon to buy that new fangled contraption with all the horses under the bonnet (hood). Well, they wouldn’t complain back then, but I will in saying the hatches and doors sound a little “tinny”. On the positive side, however, they designed in lots of cubbyholes for storage and I appreciate that everything is laid out well.

Conveniences:

Not a lot, but enough. Reminds be of my favorite quote; “Enough is abundance to the wise”. So I’ll try to be a little wiser about my next car purchase and live with a few less gadgets, and use the money I save for a trip to Hawaii.

Cost:

Not too bad. Overall it is impressive that they can make a car with so much for so little money. Thanks to Ford the average car buyer has been buying affordable cars since the Model T and A at the turn of the 20th Century.

Consumer Recommendation:

Cars of this price range are Economy cars and they have their place in the lineup of what we have to choose from. Like I always say, the car you buy should fit your need. It truly is a good young family car, or those on a strict budget as evidenced by the fact that 50% of Focus sales have been to young drivers (35 and younger). I remember buying a Ford Fiesta back in the late 1970’s and this Focus reminds me of that car, albeit an upscale version. That was a great car and if daughter Jennifer hadn’t rolled it, it would still be running today.

The Competition:

Daewoo Nubira $11,699-15,199,Hyundai Elantra Wagon $12,499, Saturn SW $14,290, Subaru Impreza Wagon $17,495-23,495, Suzuki Esteem Wagon $13699-16,499.

Good News:

Affordable new car pricing, 100,000-mile tune up interval, good gas mileage.

Bad News:

Road noise, tinny sound from doors and especially the rear hatch.

Standard Equipment:

2.0 Liter 4-cylinder engine, auto transaxle front wheel drive, dual air bags, child safety door locks, remote keyless entry, theft system, power rack and pinion steering, power front discs and rear drum ABS braking system, independent suspension, rear window defroster with wiper / washer, luggage rack, dual power mirrors, air conditioning, stereo with CD player and power windows.

Gas Stats:

25 City and 31 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $17,795.

2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Convertible (352)

No comments
2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Convertible (352)

Overview:

This week we’re visiting friends in the 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Convertible. If you read my reviews often you know that I have a love for speed. Just ask anyone who drives with me.Fortunately each year I get to drive all new cars on a racetrack, so I don’t feel the need to do it on the highways. I try to drive according to the posted speed laws, just like you. Right?

Handling & Performance:

The high-line GT model has a 200-horsepower V6, and that’s the one I tested, with the manual trans. You’ll have to pay an extra $1,000 if you want an automatic. The GT has a stiffer suspension than other models and bigger tires for better handling.

If fuel economy is a consideration for you, the 4-cylinder model with the manual transmission provides a few more miles per gallon at 22 city and 30 highway.

Stopping distances are good in this GT because of 4-wheel disc brakes necessary for performance driving and more demanding braking conditions.

Styling:

They have provided adequate room for two 6-footers, but don’t try to put them in the rear seat. The doors are long and make it awkward to get in and out, especially in tight parking areas. Front seats are comfortable and supportive in the curves.

The trunk spoiler looks cool, but it blocks your rear view with the top up, because the back window is small. But the rear window is glass and I’d rather have it small and glass than large and plastic.

Fit and Finish:

Typical Japanese quality in this area of construction. I’m rarely disappointed in how well them put things together. They’ve learned well from their conquering hero’s, eh.

Conveniences:

You get what you pay for, and this Eclipse is competitive in what they give you.

Cost:

Not bad, unless you opt for the premium package that includes ABS brakes, upgraded Stereo with cassette and 4 disc in-dash CD changer, leather seats, power drivers seat and side air bags where you’ll add $2,370.

Recommendation:

If a sports car fits your need at this time in your life, this is the best of the bunch, in my humble opinion. Plus, it has unique styling that stands out from the crowd in this price range. I’d be interested in your opinion if you test-drive some of the competition.

The Competition:

Acura Integra $19,400-24,450, Audi TT $31,200-38,900, BMW Z3 $31,300-37,900, Chevrolet Camaro $17,305-28,980, Ford Mustang $17,095-32,605, Honda Prelude $23,600-26,100, Mazda MX-5 Miata $21,180-25,715, Mercury Cougar $16,700-22,050, Toyota Celica $16,985-21,455.

Good News:

Fast V6, state of art soft top, great ride and solid feel, handles like a sports car should, distinctive styling

Bad News:

Small trunk and opening, small rear seat.

Standard Equipment:

3.0 liter V6 engine, 5-speed manual trans, dual airbags, anti theft, power rack and pinion steering, 4-wheel sport tuned independent steering, power ventilated disc brakes, power soft top, air conditioning, power windows, locks and side mirrors, Infinity stereo with CD player, 10-way adjustable driver seat, adjusting steering column, keyless entry, cruise control, leather wrapped steering wheel, power antenna.

Gas Stats:

20 City and 27 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $25,407

2001 Saturn LW 200 Wagon (349)

No comments
2001 Saturn LW 200 Wagon (349)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the 2001 Saturn LW 200 Wagon. Just when you thought inflation was steeling you blind, up jumps competition. Ain’t it great? Consider that in 1967 I bought a new Chevy Malibu for a whopping $2,500. Relatively speaking, you get more for your money today in spite of inflation.

I’ve had several friends who’ve owned Saturn’s and it’s two thumbs up from one and all. This 2001 is a much-improved car from the first Saturn’s to hit the market in1991, in my opinion.

Handling & Performance:

This is an enjoyable car in which to zip around town. I understand the 4-cylinder model strains a bit, but the V6 I tested was spunky and it’s low profile gives it an almost sport car feel. Overall, it is very comfortable. The main structure is galvanized steel coated for long life and a warranty to go along with that. What gives Saturn the comfortable ride includes independent suspension, MacPherson struts in front, stabilizer bars, coil springs and gas shocks.

Styling:

Plain Jane, but clean lines none-the-less and a nice looking automobile.

Fit and Finish:

Perfectly fine. Not much to fault here. Saturn does a nice job and I believe that is a tribute to the unique organization of the company and it’s employee involvement. Saturn also boasts dent resistant doors and quarter panels that are covered with plastic. Friends tell me it actually works. I should have got a hammer to test the theory, but Saturn would take a dim view of that kind of testing.

Conveniences:

Not much. In fact there isn’t even a gear indicator. It has manual seats, and not a lot of storage compartments. It’s a pretty basic car.

Cost:

My first really nice car was a 1955 Ford ½ ton pickup truck and you couldn’t get any plainer than that. But it suited the need and was much better than the 1946 Chevy ½ ton pickup truck it replaced. In those days you might pay $1,500 for a near new car or truck. In any case, cost is more a function of how much your budget will allow. If this Saturn  fits your need, you’ll find prices have only risen with inflation over the years since its introduction in 1991 (the wagon was not included in the line that year). The price range was under $8,000 for the base model to under $12,000 for other models. At $20k this Saturn is well priced, in light of the fact it has improved in 10 years.

Recommendation:

When I had a couple of young kids, a larger wagon was a good idea but before we had children we opted for a small wagon from Datsun (later to become Nissan). This Saturn is much nicer than that vintage 1960’s plain import, and maintenance was a nightmare in those days for any foreign make. This, built in America, wagon is high quality and is great for a young couple about to start a family. It is affordable to buy and cost effective to operate. Later, when the family grows and a trip to the beach means surf riders, umbrellas, coolers etc., (boy I’m tired just thinking about it), a larger wagon or mini van is a better choice.

If price is even more important to you, take a look at Kia, Toyota – like the Corolla and Echo and Chevy Cavalier. See my web site “Price Range” for others by going to www.atthewheel.com

The competition:

Ford Taurus Wagon $20,480, Mercury Sable Wagon $21,285-22,985, Volkswagen Passat Wagon $22,250-29,010.

 Good News:

Priced well, easy to drive, unique low pressure buying experience, good gas performance for a powerful V6, adequate room in the cabin and cargo area and excellent for the young family.

Bad News:

You can usually spot a Saturn on the road but it’s still a plain Jane, not a lot of frills.

Standard Equipment:

3.0 liter 182 hp V6 engine, auto trans, dual air bags, child safety locks, air conditioning, power windows and door locks, tilt steering wheel, cruise control, radio with cassette and CD players.

Gas Stats:

20 City and 26 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $ 19,080-21,605

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com

Copyright © 2001 – An Automotive Love Affair

2001 Ford Escape XLT 4X2 (348)

No comments
2001 Ford Escape XLT 4X2 (348)

Overview:
This weeks test car is the 2001 Ford Escape. It was developed with Mazda who sells the Tribute based on the same platform and power trains. Both SUV’s roll off the same assembly plant in Missouri. Ford owns part of Mazda.

I always complain about how difficult it is to get in and out of the typical full size SUV, but that isn’t true of this Escape. I think you’re going to like this version as much as I did. It’s the best in a long time. Nice going Ford.

Handling & Performance:

The 70.1 inch wide beam makes for good handling characteristics. Put up the jib mate and head into the wind, we’re going places. And we’ll burn less gas than most SUV’s, primarily because it’s a two-wheel drive. Contrary to what you’d expect, a 4X4 won’t get better mileage while in two-wheel drive, compared to a true 2-wheel drive vehicle like this front-wheel-drive Escape. However, if you just have to have a 4X4, it is available with Ford\’s Control Trac II 4-wheel-drive system.

Styling:

If it walks like a duck and quacks like one it probably is a duck. This looks like most other SUV’s even if it is only a 2-wheel drive, and it will be an effective SUV 95% of the time. It has nice lines but I don’t care for the side step bars. I couldn’t find a use for them. In effect they are only facades to give it that macho off road look.

Fit and Finish:

This Escape is put together very well and I tend to like it over the quality of the other competitors.

Conveniences:

You can opt for a tow package that will tow up to 3,500 pounds, contrasted with the CR-V, for example, with a maximum towing capacity of 1,000 pounds, and the RAV4 up to 1,500 pounds.

Cost:

Well priced because you get an SUV, granted on a smaller scale, but with lots of standard equipment and your operating costs will be less if you opt for the 4X2 drive train.

Consumer Recommendation:

There have been several manufacturers’ recalls, which are not only embarrassing, consumers will surely question the quality of this new model. I wouldn’t worry too much about the recalls, however, because they are minor issues. I tested the Jeep Cherokee and while I liked it a lot I got a better feeling driving this Escape. For the dough and all things being equal, this is the best of the competition.

The Competition:

Chevrolet Tracker $15,435-21,430, Honda CR-V $18,750-22,800, Jeep Cherokee $17,910-23,480, Kia Sportage $14,645-19,345, Mazda Tribute $17,210-23,430, Mitsubishi Montero Sport $22,747-32,777, Nissan Xterra $17,999-25,099, Subaru Forester $20,295-22,895, Suzuki Grand Vitara $18,399-22,999, Toyota RAV4 $16,365-17,765.

Good News:

Well priced, car-like ride, comfortable and spacious, powerful 200 hp V6 or a more fuel efficient 130 hp 4 cylinder option, good handling and attractive styling.

Bad News:

Poorly placed ignition, early production Escapes had five safety-related recalls in five early months of sales, including wipers that could stop working, steering wheels could come loose, possible fuel line leakage and vehicle fires.

Standard Equipment:

Standard Equipment: 3.0 liter 200 hp V6 engine mated to a 4-speed auto trans front wheel drive (optionally a 4X4 is available and a 4-cylinder engine), power windows, door locks and mirrors, roof rack, rear window wiper/washer, cloth bucket front seats, 60/40 split rear seat, cruise control and tilt leather wrapped steering wheel, stereo with cassette and CD, air conditioning, remote keyless entry, 4-wheel ABS brakes, dual front and side air bags, power 6-way driver seat.

Gas Stats:

18 City and 24 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $23,305.

2001 Pontiac Montana Mini Van (347)

No comments
2001 Pontiac Montana Mini Van (347)

Overview:

This week I finally had the opportunity to test the 2001 Pontiac Montana Mini Van. Do you know the way to San Jose? How about Oregon? Well, that’s where I took this top of the line family van. It was really comfortable and as good as they get for a long trip. Up the central valley of California from Los Angeles to southern Oregon is about 700 miles, and not a sore tosch in the crowd.

The automatic doors made our many stops easier and the entertainment center was a lifesaver to occupy the two little ones. Which movie do you want? Mary Poppins was a hit. Timeless, isn’t it. Comfort also goes a long way to keep young passengers from saying, “are we there yet?” Simply put, I was impressed. Charlie, our Border Collie took the whole third row seats and didn’t make a whimper the whole trip. So although we could have seated 6 comfortably we toted five, including Charlie and the luggage fit in the remaining small cargo area.

In the central valley of California the temperatures can get downright uncomfortable but the air conditioning was fantastic. The rear air controls kept the kids and dog oblivious to the outside temps over 100 degrees.

If you’ve made the trip you already know you must cross two mountain ranges with climbs and decents that are long hard grades. The Grapevine, above LA, in California and the Siskious in southern Oregon. The climb from Redding, California begins with the breathtaking vistas of snow covered Mt. Shasta and Shasta Lake. What a beautiful country we live in.

The boots are real but cowboys don’t wear Levis. They wear Wranglers. If you know why, drop me a line and I’ll share your answer with the world. Go to Contact Us.

Handling & Performance:

The Montana I tested was equipped with the sport performance suspension and auto leveling plus traction control. It provides excellent handling with plenty of power from the V6, so I never felt the need for more. Passing those trucks was a breeze. Thanks Pontiac for a nice ride.

Styling:

I think they’ve been cloning these things since they stumbled onto the current body style that folks seem to like most. In a way, it is pretty plain but very functional like most of the competition. Before the mini van, “Really Plain” vans were made to function as a family transport vehicle. In the roaring ‘60’s the van got especially popular. The VW van became a symbol of Freedom, from free sex to ban the bomb free speech.

Fit and Finish:

Well done, Detroit. You’ve finally broken the Japanese code and continue to pump out near replicas of your Japanese counterparts that are often priced higher.

Conveniences:

Take a look at the equipment list and if it isn’t there, you don’t need it. Then take a trip with the kids or grandkids and you’ll dump that macho SUV and buy an ultra convenient mini van. And convenience is what really differentiates this class, from every other vehicle out there. It does it all and does it best.

Cost:

You’ll expect to pay as much as a 4X4 Sport Utility, but you’ll save on gas and for the most part accomplish the same thing as the utility vehicle.

Recommendation:

I wouldn’t suggest buying one without the auto doors on both sides. They are simply too convenient for the family who must move kids from place to place. You’re going to have to test ‘em all I’m afraid, unless you wouldn’t own anything but a Ford, then you’ll opt for the Windstar. If you like GM cars you’ll find this Pontiac equal to the challenge of Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Nissan, Honda and all the others. On the other hand, I really liked the Honda Odyssey.

The competition:

Chevrolet Venture $21,200-30,315, Chrysler Town & Country $24,430-37,510, Dodge Caravan $19,160-32,235, Ford Windstar $20,220-33,765, Honda Odyssey $23,900-26,400, Mazda MPV $20,675-26,280, Oldsmobile Silhouette $26,655-33,320, Toyota Sienna $23,905-28,436.

Good News:

Great family vehicle with lots of room, third row seats, good performance, entertainment center, comfortable, good alternative to the SUV.

Bad News:

Pricey since it’s at the upper end of the scale.

Standard Equipment:

3.4 liter 185 horsepower V6 engine, 4-speed automatic trans, 25 gallon gas tank, front and side air bags, 4-wheel anti lock brakes, daytime running lights, child security locks, rear wiper washer, theft deterrent system, battery run-down protection, luggage rack, dual sliding doors, tinted glass, power mirrors, power driver and passenger seats, power windows, 2nd row captains chairs, leather, tilt steering, cruise control, 6-disc in dash CD player, power rear quarter windows, keyless entry, OnStar communications system, front and rear air conditioning, leather wrapped steering wheel with radio controls, rear audio controls, traction and auto level control, rear parking sensors, entertainment center for audio and video and game input.

Gas Stats:

19 City and 26 Highway MPG.

Pricing:

MSRP $34,220.

First838485868788899091Last

Recent Comments by Autolove

    No comments by Autolove yet.

English EN Spanish ES