About: Autolove

Joe Mavilia is a syndicated columnist with more than 35 years in the automotive industry. He is a member of the Motor Press Guild and Automotive Press Association. His reviews have been published in print media including the Los Angeles Times, The Golden Transcript - Colorado, La Feria News - Texas, The Pasadena Weekly - California, and others around the country, including www.theweekenddrive.com where he is the West Coast Editor. Reviews and Opinion Columns may also be seen in Sunnews.org and The Country Journal every week in the Antelope Valley, CA. I hope they are helpful

Recent Posts by Autolove

2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS (575)

No comments
2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS (575)

Overview:

Portland Oregon was the beginning point for the test drive to southern Oregon in a 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS 2-door sport coupe. I panicked because I realized I still had my travel bag with a huge golf bag and all the other stuff I picked up at Pinehurst, NC. Once I saw this small sports car I was certain I would have to strap the club bag to the top.

But when I opened the hatchback I was amazed and relieved all at the same time.

This Eclipse was a pleasant surprise of great new styling and more importantly everything fit comfortably. And if you can believe this, I could have had a friend join me for a twosome with equally large golf bag and luggage to boot. Wow. Thank you Mitsubishi.

It is about 5 hours from Portland to Medford and although I had hoped to hit the links the weather didn’t cooperate. The ride however did and that was a delightful drive.

General Info:

Parts – 47% US / Canadian, 35% Japan including engine and transmission.

Assembly – Normal, Illinois, USA

Class:  – Subcompact

Cars:  Eclipse, Endeavor, Galant, Lancer, Montero, Outlander and Raider.

Handling & Performance:

You gotta just love the excitement of driving a sports car. It is no surprise such cars are the choice of many men in their second midlife crisis. It truly makes you feel young again.

If 162 hp (up from 147 in ’05) horsepower isn’t enough for you the GT model sports a 3.8 liter 263 hp (up from 210 in ’05) V6 engine. However you’ll give up 5 mpg around town and for my money that is not a necessary tradeoff. I never wanted for power – ever, as the gearing is great for the 162 horsepower at my disposal.

Front wheel drive is a departure from the all wheel drive previous generation and with several hundred pounds added weight you’ll notice a slight change in steering characteristics. I didn’t find it a problem however and it shouldn’t deter you from considering this very capable sports car.

A four speed automatic is optional which isn’t recommended for the smaller engine. Traction control and Stability control is not available on the GS but I couldn’t get too excited about that for the price. For $4,000 more you can get the GT with Traction control standard with the 3.8 liter 263 hp engine.

Styling:

Perhaps this is the best-looking Eclipse ever – in my opinion. Its racy new design may remind you of the Lexus SC 430 as it does me. This new Eclipse is roomier and larger … but you may be disappointed with the marginal rear seat space. However that is true of the much more expensive ($65,000) Lexus SC430 as well.

Perhaps the most common complaint is the limited rear seat space. But in a pinch it is usable which can’t be said for “no, zip, nada, none” as in a two seater.

Fit and Finish:

Very good to outstanding.

Cost:

Great pricing in these days where the dollar seems to have lost its value. Before looking at the price I drove the car over 300 miles. After that familiarization I was impressed with how affordable it is.

Conveniences:

All the usual stuff – enough but not too much. And for the money you won’t do any better.

Consumer Recommendation:

Drive the Nissan 350Z and then the more affordable Eclipse before you make your decision on the sports car to own.

The Competition:

Mitsubishi Eclipse $19-24,000, Mazda RX8 $25-32,000, Toyota Celica $18-22,000, Scion tC $16,000, Ford Mustang $19-31,000, Acura RSX $20-24,000, Nissan 350Z $27-40,000.

Good News:

Decent fuel economy, well priced, fun to drive, good hatchback storage space closed off from the front that makes it a trunk with great access.

Bad News:

Very small rear seat area.

Standard Equipment:

2.4 liter 162 horsepower inline 4 cylinder engine with anti theft immobilizer, 5 speed manual transmission, dual front and side and curtain airbags, upper and lower child restraint anchor system, power assisted 4-wheel ABS disc brake system, power rack and pinion steering, 4-wheel independent suspension, front and rear stabilizer bars, air conditioning, power windows and door locks, AM/FM with CD player and six speakers and MP3 playback, cruise control, 6-way power driver seat with lumbar support, remote keyless entry, 50/50 split fold down rear seat and height adjustable steering column.

Gas Stats:

23 City and 30 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $19,399.

2005 Nissan Armada SE 4X4 SUV (574)

No comments
2005 Nissan Armada SE 4X4 SUV (574)

Overview:

This week I found myself in North Carolina to test-drive the Nissan Armada SE 4X4 SUV. Ok, so I would also be carrying 4 sets of golf clubs to Pinehurst – site of the 2005 US Open. And yes Richard, we had to play #2 even though it was yet another “Surcharge”. And no it wasn’t worth the extra $150 even if it didn’t add frustration to round of golf.

Its notoriety is simply due to the domed greens – yes the very ones that made John Daly walk off the course in ’98 or ’99. The course was not in very good condition and they should have paid me to play it. #4 on the other hand is a beautiful course and #7 was OK too. We got rained out of playing #8, but by then my body was sore and tired.  

Well aside from the difficult golf everyone seemed to enjoy the ride in this SUV. Charlotte airport is about 112 miles from Pinehurst so we had some time to pick on this Armada if we wanted to. The name is appropriate since if felt like you were aboard a Spanish warship from the fleet. This has got to be one of the most substantial feelings of all the competition. Everyone aboard liked the ride as much as me. Anchors a-weigh.

Public Service: Well, last week I said that when driving, keep your head down and follow through. Although it is good golf advice and I did a pretty good job of taking that advice the long straight drives didn’t reflect on my score all that much. I did much better driving the Armada no matter what Richard says.

Handling & Performance:

I felt dwarfed, as did “too tall” Norm. But in spite of its massive size and feel it was amazingly stable and off course you could see the road great. If you have to tote a lot of stuff and passengers this is the hot ticket. We carried 4 hombres with luggage and large golf bags in travel cases. That puppy was loaded down and handled like a champ. The 305 horsepower engine helped a lot in that department. But the 8 cylinders sucked up gas like it was cheap and plentiful. It gets no better than 18 mpg on the highway and that translates to piss poor performance from that point of view.

Styling:

The Armada has sharp angular design touches that you either like or hate. Me? Oh I like it. But then I like the look of a Mack Truck too. Yep, everything is very oversized on this Armada. After the overall look the first thing you notice is the huge door handles. If you like dainty look at the Lexus. I gotta believe this will be embraced more by men – just a guess.

Fit and Finish:

When components are so large you hardly notice how they all fit together. That’s a good thing. But I did look and all the lines are straight and true. But that didn’t surprise me – Japanese manufacturers are very particular about how their products are pieced together.

Cost:

Wow! Close to $40 grand. Well, everything else is big too, so why not the price. So brace yourself at the pump where the cost continues.

Conveniences:

The list of features is very complete and more than I need and in some cases more than I want. I subscribe to the KISS principle.

Consumer Recommendation:

If money for gas is no object and you need a lot of space to carry up to 8 and haul a few tons, and you like the macho bulky feeling this is a great choice. H2 would be a similar choice and the H3 is right in there too. I’m testing the H3 now and will let you know in the next few weeks.

The Competition:

Nissan Armada SE $34-42,000, Ford Expedition $33-45,000, Toyota Land Cruiser $56,000, Lincoln Navigator $49-55,000, Hummer H2 $53,000, GMC Yukon XL $38-43,000, GMC Yukon $35-40,000, Lexus LX 470 $66,995, Cadillac Escalade $54-70,000, GMC Yukon Denali $50-52,000, Chevrolet Suburban $37-43,000, Infiniti QX56 $50-53,000, Land Rover LR3 $38-53,000.

Good News:

Very roomy and comfortable, tow rating of up to 6,000 pounds and seats up to 8.

Bad News:

Gas guzzler with 28 gallon fuel tank to allow you to get from gas station to gas station,

Standard Equipment:

5.6 liter 305 hp V8 engine, 5-speed auto trans, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, all mode 4-wheel drive system, Oil pan skid plate, front and rear stabilizer bars, 18” alloy wheels, heated power mirrors, roof rack, running boards, liftgate with opening glass, seating for 8, AM/FM with 6-in dash CD audio system with 8 speakers, rear audio controls, steering wheel controls for audio and cruise control, climate control independent front and rear, power drivers 8-way seat with adjustable pedals, fold down passenger seat and fold flat 2nd and 3rd row seats, large lockable center console storage, 3 row overhead console with compass and temperature display, 6 overhead dome lights, 6 tie down anchor points, remote keyless entry system, power windows and locks, manual rear flip out quarter windows, extender visors, speed sensitive variable intermittent wipers front and rear, rear proximity sensors, supplemental roof mounted curtain airbags with side impact and rollover protection for all three rows, advanced air bag system, anchors and tethers for children and rear door locks, dynamic control system, tire pressure monitoring system and vehicle security and immobilizer systems.

Gas Stats:

13 City and 18 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $36,400.

2006 Chevrolet Impala LTZ 4-door Sedan (573)

No comments
2006 Chevrolet Impala LTZ 4-door Sedan (573)

Overview:
This week I test-drove the Chevrolet Impala LTZ sedan. It is especially nice to have the roominess of a full size sedan after driving a small sports car like the Mazda Miata MX-5 last week.

If I had wanted to play golf with a friend, my friend better have a big car because the Miata would not even carry ONE set of clubs. In the Impala I could easily stow my clubs in a travel bag. Few cars have trunks as long or deep as this Impala. I can’t imagine how I would have toted them to the airport – and Richard’s too. We’re not off to see the Wizard but the yellow brick road leads to Pinehurst, North Carolina. There I will test the Nissan Armada and be humbled by 4 golf courses where the Open is played earlier each year.  

Well, aside from being big enough to carry Richard’s and my clubs and other travel bags this is a great family car, company car or FBI fleet car. But it’s not boring and not all that plain as you’d expect for a stealth FBI car.

Public Service: When driving, keep your head down and follow through. Driving is much better that way. Trouble is I can’t walk and chew gum at the same time so how can I be expected to ever be a consistent golfer?

General Info:

Parts – n/a

Assembly – Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Class:  – Large

Cars:  Astro, Avalanche, Aveo, Blazer, Cavalier, Cobalt, Colorado, Corvette, Equinox, Express,   HHR, Impala, Malibu, Monte Carlo, Silverado, SSR, Suburban, Tahoe, Trail Blazer,          Uplander and Venture.

Handling & Performance:

Generally this LTZ is more powerful than any of the competition. And if you want even more, a V8 is available (since 2000 but not prior models back to 1996). There is plenty of power and the ride is silky smooth. There is a hint of road noise but I found the silence quite refreshing after driving small tinny cars. From starting to stopping you’ll feel in control and comfy-cozy. Acceleration is quick and smooth. Braking is also smooth and quiet too.

Something you begin to see, (as with this Impala), is Variable Valve Timing equipped engines on more and more American cars. Such technology has been available on many Japanese cars for quite some time but just being adopted by American carmakers.

Styling:

Ok, so it isn’t an FBI car and it does have nice lines. The interior is dressed up with some nice wood accents on the dash that gives a more elegant feeling than I expected. Impala was so popular in the decade of the 1960s it topped the sales charts in the first half of the 1960s with over three quarters of a million units sold each year. Sales in 1969 topped 800,000 units sold. Then the Japanese took a huge share of the market stealing the success of Impala and knocking it from sales leader with Toyota’s Camry. 2004 saw sales of Impala reach less than 300,000 units sold.

Fit and Finish:

Quite good.

Cost:

All of the competition is very close in pricing. You’ll have to make the distinction of what is the best car for the money on some basis other than cost. As for me I like to support cars made in the US and help the troubled GM and Ford companies who are losing money. I supported the Japanese in the 1960’s because American carmakers were getting too big for their own, and the consumers good. Unions were pushing wages through the roof and made American cars too expensive and unable to compete with foreign products. Simply put the industry shot themselves in the foot – both feet really.

Conveniences:

This is a roomy sedan – classified “Large” – it has the best front legroom of almost all the competition. In the large sedans I have been testing recently I’ve become accustomed to the great feature of sensors built into the bumpers for obstacle detection. It is not needed on small cars but on the larger ones it is nice to have to assist when backing up. Unfortunately rear sensors are NOT available on the Impala.

Consumer Recommendation:

Boy this is the toughest competition grouping I’ve seen in a long time. Generally I can find a couple of cars that stand out. But this is really close. I love ‘em all. Camry has been the leader for a long time with so many people and for good reason – the Japanese came to play. They are fiercely competitive and capable – no formidable adversaries.

The Competition:

Chevrolet Impala LTZ $21-27,000, Mercury Montego $24-29,000, Pontiac Grand Prix $23-29,000, Saturn L300 $21,000, Mitsubishi Galant $19-26,000, Dodge Charger $22-35,000, Hyundai Sonata $18-23,000, Buick LaCrosse $23-28,000, Ford Five Hundred $22-28,000, Toyota Camry $18-26,000, Mazda 6 $19-28,000, Honda Accord $18-29,000, Nissan Altima $18-30,000.

Good News:

Decent mileage for the power, it is quiet, it is smooth riding, it has a huge trunk and it has great styling.

Bad News:

No rear obstacle sensors available.

Standard Equipment:

3.9 liter variable valve timing V6 240 horsepower engine, 4-speed electronic transmission, (optional V8 is 303 horsepower), front wheel drive, 4-wheel independent suspension, stainless steel exhaust, OnStar service one year, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, traction control, tire pressure monitor, dual front and head curtain airbags, auto headlights, programmable auto door locks, theft deterrent system, child seat latch and door security systems, power heated mirrors, fog lights, rear spoiler, tilt steering wheel with wheel mounted cruise and audio controls, 8-way driver and 6-way passenger seats, remote vehicle starting system, XM Satellite radio, Bose audio system with CD and MP3 players and rear flip and fold flat seat.

Gas Stats:

19 City and 27 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $26,870.

2006 Mazda Miata MX-5 (572)

No comments
2006 Mazda Miata MX-5 (572)

Overview:

This week I tested the “pea popper” Mazda Miata MX-5 and as that description came to mind I considered that it really communicates something less than a serious sport car driving experience.

That is not entirely true and Merkel is quick to tell me how much better and capable this car is compared, for example, to the new Pontiac Solstice. I have driven both and I’m not buying it. Both are small cars and closely priced and in this class I might lean to the Solstice that is very well priced on its roll out as a new car for 2006.

What I think I miss in little cars in this price range is the weight that gives them the solid feeling that you get with a Cadillac XLR for example. Even the Porsche Boxster has that light feeling that can be a little unsettling in even a moderate wind.

At the end of the day however for the money this Miata and the Solstice are the closest in performance, feel and style. Both are very nice.

Public Service: I find most drivers are thoughtful and considerate drivers. But if you are one of those who seem oblivious to your surroundings let this be a reminder to be aware. Allow others to pass without getting angry. Mountain driving is a classic example of the need to be courteous. There is nothing to be ashamed of not being in the lead. And it is commendable when you pull over and let others pass – safely I might add. And what’s more, not only the other drivers will appreciate the courtesy, you too will enjoy the drive much more.

General Info:

Parts – Japan 95%

Assembly – Hiroshima, Japan

Class: Sport Car

Cars: Mazda 3, 5, 6, 6 Sport Wagon, Speed 6, MPV, MX-5, RX-8, Tribute and Truck.

Handling & Performance:

Although it is low to the ground I didn’t feel as “in control” as I did with the Nissan 350Z for example that I recently tested over the same road. Well, you get what you pay for and the “Z” is quite a bit more money and most of that is in the engine, drive train and suspension.

Styling:

Not much change has been made over the years. But if it ain’t broke why fix it. Indeed, why change a design that is so well received and popular?

Fit and Finish:

Quite good.

Cost:

Very good, but the new Pontiac Solstice should prove huge competition for this little sports car since it is priced even better. I believe the price will go up on the Solstice in the next model year.

Conveniences:

The list below describes a decent compliment of standard features. The manual operated soft top tucks away easily and still leaves room for a trunk. This is not true of most of the competition, and in particular with the Solstice. The top there folds into the trunk area, smaller already from a protruding fuel tank. With the top down you are left with a very teensy weensy area that may accommodate a regular set of golf clubs. In the Miata there is a distinct trunk with room for small bags but no golf clubs.

Consumer Recommendation:

You will surely want to look at the hot new Pontiac Solstice if in the market for this class car. I’m wondering which way you would sway. If you have time email me on your decision.

The Competition:

Mazda Miata MX-5 $20-27,000, Mercedes SLK $46-61,000, Honda S2000 $33,150, Volkswagen New Beetle $17-25,000, BMW Z4 $35-42,000, Nissan 350Z $27-37,000, Pontiac Solstice $19,420, Audi TT $34-44,000.

Good News:

Sport Car driving fun, small and powerful, provides a trunk even though it is a convertible.

Bad News:

So low to the ground it is uncomfortable to enter and exit, two seat limitation, not as solid sounding as I like, you’ll be looking up everyone’s tailpipe since about 50% of all vehicles on the road these days is a truck, SUV or Van.

Standard Equipment:

2.0 liter Inline 4-cylinder 170 horsepower engine, 6-speed manual transmission, rear wheel drive, 4-wheel ABS disc brakes, manual vinyl soft top, power mirrors, fog lights, air conditioning, leather tilt steering wheel, leather shift knob, AM/FM audio with CD player, front and rear stabilizer bars, front dbl wishbone suspension, rear multi-link suspension, glass rear window defogger, Aluminum hood, trunk and engine compartment framing, dual exhaust, steering wheel mounted cruise and audio controls, power windows and locks, dual front and side air bags and antitheft engine immobilizer.

Gas Stats:

24 City and 30 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $22,935.

2005 Ford Mustang GT Coupe (571)

No comments
2005 Ford Mustang GT Coupe (571)

Overview:
This week I needed a jump-start for a quiet heart. This 2005 Ford Mustang GT Coupe is just what the doctor ordered. You can just hear the doctor yelling, “Clear!” as the paddles are pressed to the chest of the heart attack patient in the ER, when all the patient really needed was to buy a car that gets the heart pumping every morning without caffeine.

Truly… you know down deep inside when you turn the ignition key you have a tiger by the tail. That’s one big pussycat. And you will enjoy your trip down memory lane back to the past while driving in the present and on into the future.

Last week I experienced the quiet performance of the Cadillac CTS. That was a ball to drive too. This Mustang is more of a braggart and makes a lot of noise but doesn’t perform any better. Sometimes it is the quiet ones that are the most exciting, not that either are homely. Know what I mean.

This is Hot, Sporty and Youthful and I like the robust exhaust sound reminiscent of the early Mustangs and most muscle cars of the 50s, 60s and 70s. Today there are only a few that come to mind – The Viper, Corvette and Mustang. Anyway this was a fun jumpstart every morning and the drive home from the office was somehow more alive and enjoyable.

General Info:

Parts – USA

Assembly – USA

Class:  Sub Compact

Cars:  Mustang, Crown Victoria, Escape (& Hybrid), E-series Van & Wagon, Excursion, Expedition, Explorer (& Sport Trac), F-150, 250 and 350 trucks, Five Hundred, Focus (& Wagon), Freestar, Freestyle, Fusion, GT, Ranger, Taurus and Thunderbird.

Handling & Performance:

The thought of the “Crest Test” was a little scary contemplating all the ups and downs and hairpin turns. I wondered how we would handle the curves together. Would it feel as confident as the 350Z or even the Cadillac CTS both of which were fantastic partners?

Styling:

Talk about growing old gracefully… this Mustang hasn’t aged a bit. In fact it is tighter and more stylish than it was in the 1950s. A few years ago I tested the Bullet version of this Mustang and even in this GT I envision Steve McQueen sitting behind the wheel. He added a bit of excitement and class in any situation. I guess you can tell I just love this Mustang, even though I’ve owned a few Camaro’s and never a Mustang. Perhaps it is the mystique of wanting what you’ve never had. And to go more easily back in time, Ford has used a lot of aluminum and chrome. Remember those days?

Fit and Finish:

As I said, this 2005 Mustang is tightly pieced together. Don’t you just love not having to deal with rattles and squeaks as you drive down the road in most of today’s cars? And it isn’t that the roads are better paved – it is the vast improvement of materials used to put the cars together.

Cost:

Cars, like most other things you buy today, are cheaper than they have ever been – relatively speaking. Consider a Ford Model T would have cost about $700 at the turn of the century. What’s the future value of $700 in today’s dollars? Huge. In no industry is the value improvement any more dramatic than in autos.

Conveniences:

Not an abundance of gadgets but I have to tell you I appreciated the simplicity. Quite frankly all the higher tech stuff only adds to the complexity of operation. And when I’m driving a performance car the simpler the better. Otherwise my kids are needed to help me understand how to operate what should be simple. Ok, one simple example that bugs the heck out of me is when they remove a simple knob for channel selection. I just don’t get it. What are they thinking when they design a radio with anything but a knob? Is it just me or do you feel the same way?

Consumer Recommendation:

I received one comment from a young man who said he didn’t like the red and black interior leather. I told Rickie I rather like it, but it’s an extra charge anyway so you don’t have to order it that way.

When you test-drive this car, listen and look for the ratchety sounds from the drive train. To me it seems too reminiscent of early cars. Yes, this car is tighter and quieter than older versions but there is a sense the mechanical end may still be a little loosy-goosy.

The Competition:

Mustang $19-31,000, Chrysler Crossfire $29-49,000, Pontiac GTO $32,000, Toyota Celica $18-22,000, Nissan 350Z $27-37,000, Volkswagen GTI $20-22,000, Mazda RX8 $25-32,000, Infiniti G35 $31-33,000, Hyundai Tiburon $16-20,000, 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse $19-24,000, 2006 Corvette $44-65,000, 2006 Acura RSX $20-24,000.

Good News:

Stylish, powerful, great sounding robust exhaust.

Bad News:

Not bad but a little noticeable tinny sound closing the doors – not as solid a sound as I’d like to see, the mechanical was a bit lose and obvious. That is something the Japanese have engineered out of their cars generally.

Standard Equipment:

4.6 liter 300 hp V8 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, fog lights, stainless steel dual exhaust, dual power mirrors, Shaker 500 audio system with CDX6 and MP3, air conditioning, leather seats with 6-way power driver seat, split fold rear seat, center console with armrest, cruise control, tilt wheel, power door locks and windows, 4-wheel power ABS disc brakes, traction control, power rack and pinion steering, dual front air bags and remote keyless entry.

Gas Stats:

17 City and 25 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $25,705.

2006 Cadillac CTS (570)

No comments
2006 Cadillac CTS (570)

Overview:

This week we’re looking at the very popular 2006 Cadillac CTS. And although GM is losing money they are still the worlds largest auto maker. And the experience can be seen in cars like this CTS.

They are doing some wonderful things and are still the leader in innovation – an expensive process. They are positioning themselves to launch at least 5 new models of fuel cell cars in about 5 years which is way ahead of the estimate just 2 years ago when I drove the High Wire hydrogen powered fuel cell car for the future. I suppose an “Anti Gravity Hover Car” like those in Star Wars will be on the scene sooner than many can imagine also. So, quietly GM is forging forward while companies like Toyota advertise they are “Moving Forward”.  

In the meantime cars like this CTS will have to do. And they do great. It is an all around great luxury car that still carries the image of the standard by which all other cars are judged. That image is likely the reason why this is the most sought after car in the Far East – Japan and China.

General Info:

Parts – USA

Assembly – Lansing, Michigan, USA

Class:  Mid-Size

Cars: CTS, DeVille, DTS, Escalade, SRX, STS, XLR.

Handling & Performance:

The Crest Test is my course of choice along with another secret course through the San Gabriel Mountains. These provide a great real world place to see how these cars perform and it is consistent across all brands. This CTS is among the best of the best. Previously I tested the Nissan 350Z and felt it is excellent on the two courses but for a large sedan this CTS will impress even the most performance conscious drivers.

Styling:

Speaking of Star Wars – Cadillac has crafted a design over the past several years that is truly modern and space age. Yes, they have broken through their own barriers. To me the Star Wars character I think of when looking at the Cadillac line is Darth Vadar, especially when it is painted Black.

Fit and Finish:

Outstanding. I especially like the real wood steering wheel / leather combo.

Cost:

You may appreciate, as I did, the options to enhance and upgrade from the standard fare. Included was a DVD navigation system with XM Satellite radio, which also provided the Nav system with Traffic information. It plasters markers on the map to show where traffic problems are. Cost of enhanced Nav audio etc. – a mere $3,000.

Conveniences:

You just gotta love XM radio. I particularly like the music by decade feature. Another is that the monitor displays the Title and Artist, which is very cool. It eliminates arguments about the recording. The other, soon to be broadly used, is the OnStar system. I find it very helpful. It gives a great peace of mind that there is someone to help from most any driving location you find yourself. I was recently in a remote desert location in Southern California and low on fuel. Yes, we were lost. We had taken the wrong turn and with good conversation, la-la land was right around the next mountain. OnStar to the rescue. They gave us “Playback” directions, advised where the closest gas station was and “is there anything else I can do for you today”?

Consumer Recommendation:

This is a car that suits very well the younger executive on the way up. And it is priced right for that ride. If you have the option available get Run Flat tires – do that. It’s not that you can’t change a tire it is a fact that tires only go flat when you can least afford them to. It is sure to happen when you are late for an appointment or the all to familiar – running late – trip to the airport.

The Competition:

Cadillac CTS $31-51,000, Saab 9-5 $36-40,000, Lexus IS 300 $30-31,000, Jaguar X-Type $30-31,000, Infiniti M $41-50,000, Mercedes Benz E-Class $50-82,000, BMW 3-Series $31-45,000, Chrysler 300 $24-40,000, Lincoln LS $39,285, Volvo S60 $30-38,000, Audi A4 $28-45,000, Acura TL $33-36,000.

Good News:

F a a a s t, fun, but elegant at the same time. Unexpected fuel economy for a performance luxury sedan.

Bad News:

I found none.

Standard Equipment:

3.6 liter V6 engine, 6-speed manual trans, 4-wheel abs disc brakes, 16” alloy wheels, all speed traction control, leather wrapped steering wheel with controls, leather seating, power driver seat, power windows, power heated mirrors, cruise control, computer info system, rear seat pass thru to trunk, audio system with CD and 7 speakers, XM satellite radio, dual front air bags with head curtain side bags, rear window defogger, fog lights, auto on / off headlights, rear child security locks, theft deterrent system, remote keyless entry, OnStar.

Gas Stats:

17 City and 26 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $33,160.

2005 Nissan 350Z (569)

No comments
2005 Nissan 350Z (569)

Overview:

This week I went to the GM roll out of their 2006 line of cars in this 2005 Nissan 350Z. How could it get any better you ask. Well, the Corvette Z06 is a good way to start, but you know what – this Z is really cool. I could own this car.

And if I were true to the profile of older men I would get it in the convertible version. So the wind could blow through what hair I have left. Ok, so I’m not balding, but it is thinner than ever.  

Yellllll-O ! Wow, a press car that draws attention more than RED. Mustard? Well I suppose so, but it is really a great color. This is NOT a boring color. And I don’t think I would tire of it.

A lot of cars look pretty and that’s as far as it goes. But Nissan is confident about its looks and has put a lot of emphasis on the mechanical. It doesn’t show but it gives depth and interest to the car. It keeps impressing you and before you know it you have been seduced and fall in love.

Editorial Comment: Lately there has been a lot of talk about the EPA fuel performance being wrong or over stated. I don’t buy that. From all the cars I test – up to 80 per year I have always found the stated MPG numbers to be fairly accurate.

On this 350Z I found the Highway miles to be better in reality. I got over 26 mpg on the freeway with no town driving and no traffic jams between LA and San Diego.

General Info:

Parts – Japan

Assembly – Japan

Class:  Sports Car

Cars:  350Z, Altima, Armada, Frontier, Maxima, Murano, Pathfinder, Quest, Sentra, Titan and          Xterra.

Handling & Performance:

wesome! How else can you put it? Riding on rails is the best parallel in how you feel when you pull “G’s” in the mountain turns. Exhillerating describes it. you’re going to love the way this handles. And it is f a a a s t! I appreciated the close ration gear shifting and in the mountains you appreciate more the power at your disposal so you don’t need to shift often. Literally the 287 horsepower allows you to stay in a long 4th gear and still pull the grades. Really a lot of fun.

Traction control and  Vehicle dynamic control is the kind of technology you want for a performance car. It keeps you out of trouble from the typical tendency to “Oversteer” in a sharp corner. Look at the features standard on this Z and you begin to appreciate the price tag. This car is not only great looking it is a sophisticated driver.

Styling:

Wonderful, in my humble opinion. There is a brace in the trunk that is functional and they have made it look pretty but I wish it weren’t needed because it really screws up the storage area. Nice touch with the cross drilled aluminum foot pedals and accents that finishes the sport performance look – but then they knew that.

Fit and Finish:

First cabin.

Cost:

Not bad. It may seem a little pricey for a two seater but take a look at the standard equipment list. That will quickly explain what the extra cost is for. Performance for when you drive on the edge. And on the roads today you are on the edge more often than you care to be.

Conveniences:

Enough.

Consumer Recommendation:

If a “TWO” seat car fits your passion and you travel light – under 25 or over 50 years old – this is a great sports car. I must admit if money were not an issue I would pop for a Cad XLR. Not as much trunk space but for those getaway weekends up the coast to Santa Barbara with your favorite friend who doesn’t play golf … well you know. But since I really don’t want to spend $70,000 for the Cad this stylish 350Z makes a lot of sense.

The Competition:

Nissan 350Z $27-37,000, Toyota Celica $18-22,000, BMW Z4 $35-42,000, Volkswagen GTI $20-22,000, Mazda RX-8 $25-32,000, Infiniti G35 $31-33,000, Porsche Boxster $44-53,000, Mitsubishi Eclipse $19-24,000, Ford Mustang $19-31,000, Chevrolet Corvette $44-65,000, Acura RSX $20-24,000, Audi TT $34-44,000.

Good News:

F a a a s t, fun, fancy, fairly good fuel economy.

Bad News:

A little pricey unless you are performance minded, although it is equipped with “Seal Tight” windows there was a little mis-fit and it whistled. I suspect that is just an adjustment issue.

Standard Equipment:

3.5 liter 387 hp V6 engine, continuously variable valve timing, Microfinished crankshaft and camshaft, direct ignition system, electronic drive by wire throttle, 6-speed close ration transmission, carbon fiber reinforced driveshaft, viscous limited slip differentaial, traction control, Vehicle dynamic Control, independent Aluminum multi link suspension, front and rear Stabilizer bars, rear integrated strut tower brace, 4-wheel power vented anti lock disc brake system with electronic brake force distribution, 18 inch aluminum alloy wheels, flush mounted Xenon headlights, rear window wiper, heated power mirrors, 8-way manual adjustable drivers seat, 4-way manual adjustable passenger seat, power windows and locks, climate control, audio system with CD player and 6-speakers, tilt steering , cruise control, trip computer tire pressure monitor system, cross drilled aluminum foot pedals, leather wrapped steering wheel and shift knob, aluminum interior accents, security system with immobilizer, remote keyless entry and dual air bags,

Gas Stats:

20 City and 26 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $31,790.

2005 Chrysler Town & Country Limited (568)

No comments
2005 Chrysler Town & Country Limited (568)

Overview:
This weeks test car is the 2005 Chrysler Town & Country Limited Minivan. Surely this tried and true mini van family vehicle has earned a place in the market. Practical buyers (women) will opt for this “real” Utility vehicle, while (I believe) Macho men buy the SUV myth it will help him win the war. What war you ask?  Funny, that’s the same question I ask all the time. Yes, I like driving SUV’s off road over the river and through the woods to grandma’s house. But that only works in storybooks. Few SUVs, if any, will ever get dirt under their nails.

So dads want the SUV and caring moms want Minivans like this Town and Country. It is, however, interesting to watch consumer demand cause the evolution of these two vehicles toward a “Crossover” combo of both SUV and Minivan. Carmakers are responding to Dads “want” and moms “need”.

Handling & Performance:

Quite good in the turns through the San Gabriel Mountains in what I call the “Crest Test”. The lower center of gravity helps it to handle better than the higher profile SUV.

Styling:

This is one class of car that is pretty homogeneous and you gotta believe this is the first attempt at cloning.

Fit and Finish:

Chrysler has come a long way baby and I’m happy to report this is a good representation of improvements made over the years to cars generally. But in a recent test of some new product, often flawed of course, some of the trim was so poorly designed and installed I expected it to fall off in my hand. That is not the case with the Town & Country.

Cost:

Here’s a very good reason why you’ll notice the high quality of presentation of this T&C. It is at the high end of the price tags of the competition.

Conveniences:

If it isn’t on this minivan they don’t make it… well almost. The gadgets are cool and most are very functional like the power sliding side doors.

Consumer Recommendation:

Do the family a favor and buy the Mini Van instead of the SUV unless you cave easily to peer pressure. I know, when the guys come over to watch the Super Bowl game you want to have a Macho Man’s SUV in the driveway. After all you may need to head outback to hunt a lion or tiger or bear… oh my! But if you listen to your wife you’ll buy the Mini Van and save on gas and the little people in your family will thank you for how easy it is to get in and out of. The rear seat video center will be the frosting on the cookies.

If you don’t have a family at home you may still remember how convenient the minivan was when you did tote the kids about. Today’s demographics tell us that older buyers are coming back to the minivan for the convenience they remember. Golf outings, picking up the grand children or getting your aging mom and dad to and fro will be convincing to older buyers.

The Competition:

Town & Country $21-36,000, Chevrolet Venture $28-37,000, Pontiac Montana $26-30,000, Kia Sedona $21-23,000, Mazda MPV $22-29,000.

Good News:

Comfortable, good handling, good fuel economy for a 7 seat vehicle, easy stow seats, power sliding doors that also work well manually and generally an overall positive influence and image from Daimler/ Mercedes Benz – good reason Chrysler is the only American manufacturer making money.

Bad News:

Clunky shifting (in the vehicle I tested, so see what you think when you test drive it).

Standard Equipment:

3.8 liter V6 207 hp engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, dual front and side curtain air bags, tire pressure monitor and warning signal, rear back up sensors, power liftgate, power sliding side doors, 4-wheel anti lock disc brakes, latch ready child seat anchor system, traction control, 2nd row bucket seats with rear 60/40 rear split folding bench seat, rear air conditioning and heating, 3-zone climate control with air filtration system, power adjustable pedals with memory settings, heated front bucket seats, power front seats, power windows and door locks, remote keyless entry with engine immobilizer, steering wheel mounted cruise control, tilt steering column, overhead console and storage bins, removable center front console, stereo with in-dash 6CD player with DVD feature, GPS Navigation, steering wheel mounted audio controls, memory system for radio, drivers seat and mirrors, vanity mirrors on sin visors, auto headlights, vehicle security system, sunscreen glass, folding heated power mirrors, fog lights and roof rack. If this isn’t enough there are some options the most useful of which is a rear seat Video system for the kids. Wow, that’s a mouthful!

Gas Stats:

18 City and 25 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $35,530.

 

Your comments are welcomed. My e-mail is joe@atthewheel.com

Copyright © 2005 – An Automotive Love Affair

2005 Mazda 3 Sedan 4-door (567)

No comments
2005 Mazda 3 Sedan 4-door (567)

Overview:

Here we are again with yet another of hundreds of models to choose from. The 2005 Mazda 3 4-Door Sedan made the week to the Pacific Northwest a cost comfortable trip. I put on about 700 miles and that translates to about 2 tanks of gas and I got about 30 MPG. Rack ‘em up guys.

At about $3.00 per gallon for regular it cost me about $80 for the week and all that driving. If that doesn’t make you want to dump that SUV that would empty your wallet of about $240 on the same trip, I don’t know what will. Literally you can watch the needle move on the gas gauge in those gas-guzzling hunks of steel and plastic.

Don’t get me wrong everyone who drives a fuel-efficient car appreciates your contribution to the huge windfall, gouging profits of the oil companies. I knew I should have taken that job with Occidental Petroleum out of college. I could have retired by now.

Driving Tip: Ever notice your turns are a little jerky driving the curves, most noticeable in mountain driving. The way to avoid that is to pick a point on the curve as far ahead as you can see and steer to that point as a reference. Conversely, the closer you are looking at the road the jerkier are your moves. Simple but effective to becoming a better driver.

General Info:

Parts – Japan 95%.

Assembly –Hiroshima Japan.

Class: – Compact

Cars: Mazda 3, 5, 6, 6 sport wagon, MPV, MX-5 Miata, RX-8, Tribute and Truck.

Handling & Performance:

Even more power than last year, this Mazda 3 is real peppy and precise in handling. You can’t help but appreciate the mechanics of this car.

Styling:

On the other hand a lot of folks will not be as impressed with the design. It reminds me of the Toyota Prius that has an even more redeeming quality … that would be 50 miles per gallon of gas that is fast approaching the cost of a small bottle of water.

Fit and Finish:

Quite good actually. Not enough to fall in love but it has a nice personality.

Cost:

“Now that’s what I’m talking about” as Richard always says. This is chump change to more of us car buyers.

Conveniences:

Just fine thanks. Can’t think of much else I would expect for the money, can you?

Consumer Recommendation:

This is a thoughtful and responsible purchase that will make a great family car for all the right reasons. It is surely one of the great buys for transportation that is fuel efficient, roomy inside and in the trunk. (Your mother-in-law can ride back there). This is simply a great family car for the times.

The Competition:

Mazda 3 $14-19,000, Suzuki Reno Mitsubishi Lancer $14-35,000, Nissan Sentra $13-18,000, Ford Focus $13-17,000, Toyota Corolla $14-18,000, Honda Civic $14-21,000, VW Golf $16-20,000, Hyundai Elantra $13-15,000, Dodge Neon $14-21,000, Subaru Impreza $18-32,000, Chevrolet Cavalier $10-18,000.

Good News:

Priced very well for the car, nice ride with excellent handling, zippy performance from a fuel efficient 4-cyl engine, comfy seats and yes mom it has a roomy trunk.

Bad News:

Higher road noise level than I like, no sun visor extension that really ticks me off and cruise control is a little jerky.

Standard Equipment:

2.3 liter 4-cylinder engine, 5-speen manual trans, front wheel drive, halogen headlights and fog lights, cloth seats, 60/40 split fold down rear seat, AM/FM with CD audio system, tilt and telescopic steering column with leather wrapped wheel and audio controls, cruise control, center armrest and storage, air conditioning, dual front air bags, front and rear stabilizer bars, power assist rack and pinion steering, 4-wheel disc brakes, power windows and locks, rear seat child safety seat anchors, anti theft immobilizer and remote keyless illuminated entry.

Gas Stats:

25 City and 32 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $16,615.

2005 Ford Freestyle SEL, FWD Crossover SUV (566)

No comments
2005 Ford Freestyle SEL, FWD Crossover SUV (566)

Overview:
This week I tested the new for 2005 Ford Freestyle SEL AWD SUV Crossover. Boy, that’s a mouthful. And just what I needed – another new model name to remember. What happened to the ‘Good old days’ when there were only a few brands and models?

This Freestyle is lower to the ground yet SUV’ish and a new breed that is a good evolutionary (natural selection) example of how cars get better because of what you and I vote for with our car purchasing dollars. Simply put only the fittest survive. If you ever thought buying or not buying makes a difference and you didn’t have that much of an impact on what is available for sale, forget it. Your vote “Does” matter.

Another example of this is that “Now” manufacturers are beginning to advise us they are building more Hybrids … because people want them now that gas prices are on the rise. Well dahhhhh! Are they brain dead or what? What it says is that until we actually put our money on fuel efficient Hybrids, car builders will continue to produce and sell big gas guzzling SUV’s. Make a difference – vote.

General Info:

Parts – n/a

Assembly –USA

Class:  – Special Purpose

Cars:  Crown Victoria, Escape, Escape Hybrid, E-series Van and wagon, Excursion, Expedition, Explorer and sport trac, F150, F250, F350, Focus and wagon, 500, Freestar, Freestyle, GT, Mustang, Ranger, Taurus and wagon and T-Bird.

Handling & Performance:

I was relatively impressed because the Freestyle was not too scary on the mountain curves! The Ford Five Hundred that I reviewed recently had AWD with a very similar power train and was very impressive in the mountains as well. This Freestyle is a FWD (front wheel drive) vehicle and for a higher profile vehicle it pulled the corners better than a rear wheel drive vehicle. All models (SE, SEL and Limited) are available in either front or “ALL” wheel drive configurations.

Styling:

This Freestyle is pretty simple in design. It has clean lines which are my preference but I gotta tell you I get excited as do many whom I’ve talked with about the bold lines of the new Cadillac’s and Chrysler products today. They are more interesting and memorable.

Fit and Finish:

Cars and trucks today are, for the most part, well engineered to fit together better than ever. This Ford is quite good amongst a sea of cars on the menu. I, for one, expect cars to be assembled with realistic tolerances so tight seams don’t have to be too close. Remember the German designed Lugar handgun used in WWII? They fit so well together, with very close tolerances, they would jam at the slightest hint of dirt. The American’s, on the other hand, built the 45 Cal handguns with much looser fitting parts and because of that it would function even in a mud puddle.

Cost:

A little on the high side. I expected it to be better-priced – meaning less money.

Conveniences:

Good.

Consumer Recommendation:

More and more people will make all car purchases in the future with fuel economy in mind. 20-27 mpg isn’t all that bad for an SUV, but it is a consideration not to be overlooked.

The Competition:

Ford Freestyle $25-30,000, Mitsubishi Endeavor $26-33,000, Nissan Murano $27-31,000, 2006 Buick Rendezvous $27-30,000, 2006 Toyota Highlander $25-32,000.

Good News:

Great cargo area with easy fold and hide away seats, decent fuel economy.

Bad News:

Pricey for the look and feel – but Ford devotees won’t care. Pricing of the model I drove was for a FWD and of course would have been more with AWD.

Standard Equipment:

3.0 liter V6 203 horsepower engine, front wheel drive, 17” bright aluminum wheels, roof rack, fog lights, keyless entry keypad (to punch in special code to open doors for the ladies who are notorious for losing their keys), auto headlight control, 6-passenger cloth bucket seating, AM/FM with in dash MP3 / CDX6 player, 6-way power driver’s seat with lumbar support, center console, leather wrapped steering wheel with audio controls, air conditioning, dash storage bin, map pockets on front seats, power windows and locks, power steering, cruise control, anti lock braking system, child latch safety system, anti theft system and remote keyless entry with remote perimeter lighting.

Gas Stats:

20 City and 27 Highway MPG

Pricing:

MSRP $26,345.

First656667686970717273Last

Recent Comments by Autolove

    No comments by Autolove yet.

English EN Spanish ES